Ce sujet est fermé
Kyria Nyriese wrote...
xHezz90 wrote...
Hey all, I am only back for about an hour before I have to go out to that Shen Yun thing.
What's happening?
WB for about an hour
Just a discussion with someone who thought we were one of 'those' threads, and we discussed it and now he knows we aren't one of 'those' threads
Bionic Weapon wrote...
*slaps forehead*
Shepard DID say that to TIM didn't he/she? Now it's even worse.
Why didn't Shepard repeat that same logic to the catayst? Tell him that he or anyone lese in humaity or any species is not ready for that.
Even better why was Control an option at all? If these Reapers were his solution and this happened every 50,000, and Shepard did decide to use this option. He'd just send them back to Dark Space and cut them off. So therefore this solution would be rendered poitless if there wasn't a solution to use.
The catalyst gave power to a person who would not only NOT repeat this pattern but get rid it all together. The cycle is broken and his soultion is dead. If i were in control and knew Shepard, I'd do everything in my power to not even give him a hint of victory.
Ok sure the catalyst said no human made it that far, but it would make more sense if he said after that "and this is as close as you'll come" before trying to kill Shep.
To that I say "Catalyst what the hell are you doing"?
You had Shepard at your mercy and now you want to pass the throne to him/her? That's... well thats stupid.
I can associate poor project management and lack of allocated time with laziness. I'm not insintuating that they sat around on thier assses when they were supposed to be making the game. But rather that they spent much effort making decisions to see how they can cut that spent time working on the game. Not with one or two cuts, but with dozens upon dozens. That's why I use the term lazy. Especially regarding the ME2 squamates.Computim wrote...
FreedMason wrote...
g_bassi13 wrote...
Sorry, to reply to this so late, but this makes me lol. No, nothing had major reprucussions. At best they were completely minor, and at worst they meant completely nothing.
I am still upset that we could not have our "Suicide Mission" team from ME2 join us. I could accept if they just appeared for about five levels, and disappeared untill the endgame, however, to have them appear and disappear quickly was, dare I say, lazy. <_<
I'm kinda on the fence using the term lazy... most of the game developers work like 2 days of work for every 1 day I do haha.. when it gets down to crunch they do like 15-17 hour days and stuff...
I DO think it was a lousy business decision at best, poor project management at worst.
But they've heard our complaints, we're just sitting on the line hoping they fix it and we can all go home.. though I gotta admit I was hoping to at least fire ONE diseased husk over the wall... I mean why else do we have a medieval catapult on a 22nd century seige line?
Modifié par g_bassi13, 21 avril 2012 - 04:45 .
xHezz90 wrote...
Those threads? what's a those thread?
whatever I am sure we are not one lol
Kyria Nyriese wrote...
xHezz90 wrote...
Those threads? what's a those thread?
whatever I am sure we are not one lol
The ranting and raving and raging threads... you know those threads
Ihatebadgames wrote...
As far as making a replay to a specific post.If you are trying to avoid a step pyramid,you're lucky to post on the same page as fast as this thread expands.
Ihatebadgames wrote...
As far as making a replay to a specific post.If you are trying to avoid a step pyramid,you're lucky to post on the same page as fast as this thread expands.
Kyria Nyriese wrote...
Ihatebadgames wrote...
As far as making a replay to a specific post.If you are trying to avoid a step pyramid,you're lucky to post on the same page as fast as this thread expands.
Eh we just need to make sure we clean up our pyramids before the Egyptians get grumpy.
Goodwood wrote...
Ohai thar Nhari and Hezz! *bear hugs*
g_bassi13 wrote...
I can associate poor project management and lack of allocated time with laziness. I'm not insintuating that they sat around on thier assses when they were supposed to be making the game. But rather that they spent much effort making decisions to see how they can cut that spent time working on the game. Not with one or two cuts, but with dozens upon dozens. That's why I use the term lazy. Especially regarding the ME2 squamates.
sagevallant wrote...
I'm not sure I would call it laziness. The development schedules for ME3 and DA2 were pretty tight, really. Compared to the work going into the previous iterations, anyway. DA2 in particular suffered from it with the constantly repeating zones. Sure was considerate of all those quest targets to keep hiding in the same caves so we'd know where to find them.
sagevallant wrote...
I'm not sure I would call it laziness. The development schedules for ME3 and DA2 were pretty tight, really. Compared to the work going into the previous iterations, anyway. DA2 in particular suffered from it with the constantly repeating zones. Sure was considerate of all those quest targets to keep hiding in the same caves so we'd know where to find them.
My problem with DA 2 was not the story.Middle games/stories can have cliff hangers with slightly cloudy results.It was turning most of the monster silly looking.Goodwood wrote...
sagevallant wrote...
I'm not sure I would call it laziness. The development schedules for ME3 and DA2 were pretty tight, really. Compared to the work going into the previous iterations, anyway. DA2 in particular suffered from it with the constantly repeating zones. Sure was considerate of all those quest targets to keep hiding in the same caves so we'd know where to find them.
Yes, they were pretty tight. EA, it seems, are falling back into their old bad habits (or perhaps they never grew out of them?) that demanded at least one AAA game a year from their developers. That's what killed the Medal of Honor series (though the 2010 release was quite amazing in my mind and surpassed CoD:MW2 in terms of production value and quality). That said, I actually liked the ending to DA2 because it was true to the established storyline.
FreedMason wrote...
I would have waited untill 2015 to avoid this travisty of character assasination in the conclusion of ME3. Why did EA not delay the game? It is so infuriating why this company forced out an incomplete game just to make money. Why not throw out another First Person shooter, those are popular!
The issue isn't that the fans will wait as long as it takes, the issue is the people they are trying to grab for that game that aren't fans, and they lose interest really quickly. That's the problem I think right now, is the immediate gratification crowd out there. We as the fans of Mass Effect and Bioware are more than happy to wait however long it takes to make the game as good as it can be. However, they were trying to pull in the shooter crowd, which unfortunately appears to have a lot of those immediate gratification folks.xHezz90 wrote...
I would have waited however long it took them to get it right, and I think that's what these developers and what not seem to forget. The fans/customers will wait longer if it is going to be done right, I would want a chef in a restaurant to take longer making my meal instead of serving me half-cooked food.FreedMason wrote...
I would have waited untill 2015 to avoid this travisty of character assasination in the conclusion of ME3. Why did EA not delay the game? It is so infuriating why this company forced out an incomplete game just to make money. Why not throw out another First Person shooter, those are popular!
Goodwood wrote...
Yes, they were pretty tight. EA, it seems, are falling back into their old bad habits (or perhaps they never grew out of them?) that demanded at least one AAA game a year from their developers. That's what killed the Medal of Honor series (though the 2010 release was quite amazing in my mind and surpassed CoD:MW2 in terms of production value and quality). That said, I actually liked the ending to DA2 because it was true to the established storyline.
) but it was all right. A bit shallow for companion discussions.
xHezz90 wrote...
FreedMason wrote...
I would have waited untill 2015 to avoid this travisty of character assasination in the conclusion of ME3. Why did EA not delay the game? It is so infuriating why this company forced out an incomplete game just to make money. Why not throw out another First Person shooter, those are popular!
I would have waited however long it took them to get it right, and I think that's what these developers and what not seem to forget. The fans/customers will wait longer if it is going to be done right, I would want a chef in a restaurant to take longer making my meal instead of serving me half-cooked food.
However, some of the things the community makes are amazing, like those outstanding Shields comic shorts, and the YouTube analysis videos, etcetera.
Darth Suetam wrote...
Good night, everyone.
Hold the line!
*hugs back* Hey Hez~!xHezz90 wrote...
Goodwood wrote...
Ohai thar Nhari and Hezz! *bear hugs*
*hugs* wait...Nhari is here? where? *looks around*
*hugs to wherever Nhari is*
Darth Suetam wrote...
Good night, everyone.
Hold the line!
Retour en haut
