Aesieru wrote...
The lack of personal sacrifice.
I think we all knew that Shephard had to die if he was taking on the most deadly thing, he sacrifices himself for the greater good, one way or the other.
Except . . .
He can live.
Aesieru wrote...
The lack of personal sacrifice.
I think we all knew that Shephard had to die if he was taking on the most deadly thing, he sacrifices himself for the greater good, one way or the other.
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
Did I not JUSt say " I DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THE RELAYS EITHER...." ..." I AM ALL FOR SAVING THEM IF POSSIBLE..."
I am not saying it is not possible. That is why there are multiple endings.
and the whole thread is a complaint that the 'multiple' endings are really pretty much the same. Red green or blue explosions. all relays gone, etc. because instead of letting us fight like the first two games seemed to indicate,they gave us the super space gun instead.
AND strand the ship without me.
AND joker lives and I die dammit! That SOB got me killed twice!
Jokes on Joker. If Mass Effect 2 is any indication, EDI isn't very good at checking for viruses /wink /wink, /nudge /nudge.RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
Did I not JUSt say " I DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THE RELAYS EITHER...." ..." I AM ALL FOR SAVING THEM IF POSSIBLE..."
I am not saying it is not possible. That is why there are multiple endings.
and the whole thread is a complaint that the 'multiple' endings are really pretty much the same. Red green or blue explosions. all relays gone, etc. because instead of letting us fight like the first two games seemed to indicate,they gave us the super space gun instead.
AND strand the ship without me.
AND joker lives and I die dammit! That SOB got me killed twice!
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
Did I not JUSt say " I DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THE RELAYS EITHER...." ..." I AM ALL FOR SAVING THEM IF POSSIBLE..."
I am not saying it is not possible. That is why there are multiple endings.
and the whole thread is a complaint that the 'multiple' endings are really pretty much the same. Red green or blue explosions. all relays gone, etc. because instead of letting us fight like the first two games seemed to indicate,they gave us the super space gun instead.
AND strand the ship without me.
AND joker lives and I die dammit! That SOB got me killed twice!
I believe there are 2 endings where they blow up, and 3? that don't.
Aesieru wrote...
Kanmuru wrote...
GDK wrote...
Kanmuru wrote...
GDK wrote...
See, TOTALLY get that. So I understand where BW got the idea... but if the Reapers are GONE at the end... why would their old trap matter?
Symbolism. The reapers "gave" us the technology if were gonna be free from their genocide we must make our own path. I understand you would prefer a pragmatic choice but the symbolic aproach makes sense from a literary point of view.
Think of it as a "coming of age" for the galaxy, you have to leave your parents house to make a future of your own (although these "parents" are genocidal aliens i this case)
I understand that. But it still seems to favor overly-symbolistic writing instead of... well, common sense.
oh well lol thats a problem for much of ME series then.(seriously, destroying the reaper base is a stuuuuupid decision, i cant imagine how anyone inteligent person in real life would make that choice, they should just give us an option to give the base to the aliance/consil).
I guess our main diference is how we choose to see the game, i prefer a poetic/literary aproach and you focus on maximun immersion and having things make as much sense as possible(like i said a clash of worldviews)
Destroying the collector base that requires lives to harvest to use most of their technology and is an abomination of genetic engineering? Yes we should keep that...
That's like coming upon Sith Artifacts and saying OH THESE ARE POWERFUL, let's keep them.
Zulmoka531 wrote...
Jokes on Joker. If Mass Effect 2 is any indication, EDI isn't very good at checking for viruses /wink /wink, /nudge /nudge.RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
Did I not JUSt say " I DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THE RELAYS EITHER...." ..." I AM ALL FOR SAVING THEM IF POSSIBLE..."
I am not saying it is not possible. That is why there are multiple endings.
and the whole thread is a complaint that the 'multiple' endings are really pretty much the same. Red green or blue explosions. all relays gone, etc. because instead of letting us fight like the first two games seemed to indicate,they gave us the super space gun instead.
AND strand the ship without me.
AND joker lives and I die dammit! That SOB got me killed twice!
RazorrX wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
The lack of personal sacrifice.
I think we all knew that Shephard had to die if he was taking on the most deadly thing, he sacrifices himself for the greater good, one way or the other.
Except . . .
He can live.
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
Did I not JUSt say " I DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THE RELAYS EITHER...." ..." I AM ALL FOR SAVING THEM IF POSSIBLE..."
I am not saying it is not possible. That is why there are multiple endings.
and the whole thread is a complaint that the 'multiple' endings are really pretty much the same. Red green or blue explosions. all relays gone, etc. because instead of letting us fight like the first two games seemed to indicate,they gave us the super space gun instead.
AND strand the ship without me.
AND joker lives and I die dammit! That SOB got me killed twice!
I believe there are 2 endings where they blow up, and 3? that don't.
In every ending they blow up. Just different colors.
Modifié par Aesieru, 03 mars 2012 - 05:35 .
Erode_The_Soul wrote...
I sincerely cannot believe that Bioware has done what they have to the Normandy and crew (provided what has been leaked is true and the only options). Losing Shepard was something I was bracing myself for, but I refuse to accept the loss of the Normandy. This is a dealbreaker for me, regardless of context.
And to not even have one ending where Shep and crew can remain together is unsettling.
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
Did I not JUSt say " I DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THE RELAYS EITHER...." ..." I AM ALL FOR SAVING THEM IF POSSIBLE..."
I am not saying it is not possible. That is why there are multiple endings.
and the whole thread is a complaint that the 'multiple' endings are really pretty much the same. Red green or blue explosions. all relays gone, etc. because instead of letting us fight like the first two games seemed to indicate,they gave us the super space gun instead.
AND strand the ship without me.
AND joker lives and I die dammit! That SOB got me killed twice!
Kyria Nyriese wrote...
Bioware took the series, where you were fighting to preserve all the races of the galaxy and turned the finale into, eh the Reapers aren't the bad guys, they are keeping us from annihilating ourselves - which was something I was afraid Bioware was going to do after ME2. Then instead of a straight up fight, which again the entire series led up to, we get a magic gun from the protheans that allow us to:
a) Destroy the Reapers and all their tech - leaving Shepard either dead or alive and the Normandy stranded on a backwater planet with little hope of retreival.Control the Reapers - in which Shepard becomes the new Guardian, and is forever trapped within the Citadel and the cycle continues in 50,000 years. The Normandy is stranded on a distant world and the Relays are destroyed.
c) Merge - we all get turned into cyborgs and Shepard becomes goo on the floor of the Citadel, the Relays are destroyed and the Normandy is stranded on the bloody world in the middle of no where.
Do you see the trend here. No matter what we do, no matter how we choose to go, all roads lead to the same place. The Relays destroyed, Galactic Civilization set back hundreds if not thousands of years, Shepard most likely dead or might as well be dead, and the Normandy stuck on some backwater planet in the middle of no where.
Now Shepard can die, I'm cool with that, kind of expected that. The Normandy can be destroyed, kinda expected that as well. However, I expected us to save Galactic Civilization, not pretty much force everyone to start all over again.
I also expected there to be the possibility that the Reapers would win, and the cycle would continue. Which at this point I would be happier with than the choices I currently have.
Kanmuru wrote...
RazorrX wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
The lack of personal sacrifice.
I think we all knew that Shephard had to die if he was taking on the most deadly thing, he sacrifices himself for the greater good, one way or the other.
Except . . .
He can live.
Emotional sacrifice. Bioware knows we love the normandy crew thats why they did it. They wouldnt have done it otherwise...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
Did I not JUSt say " I DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THE RELAYS EITHER...." ..." I AM ALL FOR SAVING THEM IF POSSIBLE..."
I am not saying it is not possible. That is why there are multiple endings.
and the whole thread is a complaint that the 'multiple' endings are really pretty much the same. Red green or blue explosions. all relays gone, etc. because instead of letting us fight like the first two games seemed to indicate,they gave us the super space gun instead.
AND strand the ship without me.
AND joker lives and I die dammit! That SOB got me killed twice!
I believe there are 2 endings where they blow up, and 3? that don't.
In every ending they blow up. Just different colors.
Then everyone dies. Arrival proved an exploding relay destroyes a solar system, equivalent ot a super nova. People, please don't contradict yourselves.
SomethingSome wrote...
HiddenKING wrote...
SomethingSome wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
If you would try to understand the plot rather than your major love for the characters, you would then realize that the ending is very good.
Even what happens to the Normandy?
Sincerally that's what really bothers me, it actually makes my stomach curl.
I think that if Bioware wanted to move away from the Normandy and it's crew. To close the chapter on them too, they could have done somethin better than "lol crash" I would much prefer if they died in battle, at least that way their sacrifice would mean somethin. But then again people would complain about them dyin. It's not a perfect endin for your team, but one can hope things turnout well for them.
That's the thing. It very probably doesn't.
The colony is not viable, not unless they're planning on forcing/pressuring/asking every single woman on the ship to get pregnant repeatedly for as long as they're fertile and even then (if you can get past what feels like rape to me) they'd need to be extremely lucky for the results of those pregnancies to have the right genetic makeup to keep the genepool.
And even that's practically impossible to do without a large enough number of people, far larger than the number of crew member on the Normandy, unless for some reason a ship that can be maned in combat situation by 12 people + 1 AI is crewed by around 100 people.
So unless they're rescued or there's already colonys on that planet... Things don't look good to me.
*Edit for grammar, stupid 5am.
Then why does their epilogue seem to be portrayed in a hopeful light? This isn't even a case of drama for drama's sake, it really just feels like BioWare didn't even fact-check their writting.Kanmuru wrote...
RazorrX wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
The lack of personal sacrifice.
I think we all knew that Shephard had to die if he was taking on the most deadly thing, he sacrifices himself for the greater good, one way or the other.
Except . . .
He can live.
Emotional sacrifice. Bioware knows we love the normandy crew thats why they did it. They wouldnt have done it otherwise...
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
RazorrX wrote...
Bomb In My Pants wrote...
Did I not JUSt say " I DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THE RELAYS EITHER...." ..." I AM ALL FOR SAVING THEM IF POSSIBLE..."
I am not saying it is not possible. That is why there are multiple endings.
and the whole thread is a complaint that the 'multiple' endings are really pretty much the same. Red green or blue explosions. all relays gone, etc. because instead of letting us fight like the first two games seemed to indicate,they gave us the super space gun instead.
AND strand the ship without me.
AND joker lives and I die dammit! That SOB got me killed twice!
I believe there are 2 endings where they blow up, and 3? that don't.
In every ending they blow up. Just different colors.
Then everyone dies. Arrival proved an exploding relay destroyes a solar system, equivalent ot a super nova. People, please don't contradict yourselves.
There is video footage of each choice - each one has a different color explosion through the relay network. Each one.
SO I guess they decided to Retcon what an exploding mass effect relay does.
Aesieru wrote...
Kyria Nyriese wrote...
Bioware took the series, where you were fighting to preserve all the races of the galaxy and turned the finale into, eh the Reapers aren't the bad guys, they are keeping us from annihilating ourselves - which was something I was afraid Bioware was going to do after ME2. Then instead of a straight up fight, which again the entire series led up to, we get a magic gun from the protheans that allow us to:
a) Destroy the Reapers and all their tech - leaving Shepard either dead or alive and the Normandy stranded on a backwater planet with little hope of retreival.Control the Reapers - in which Shepard becomes the new Guardian, and is forever trapped within the Citadel and the cycle continues in 50,000 years. The Normandy is stranded on a distant world and the Relays are destroyed.
c) Merge - we all get turned into cyborgs and Shepard becomes goo on the floor of the Citadel, the Relays are destroyed and the Normandy is stranded on the bloody world in the middle of no where.
Do you see the trend here. No matter what we do, no matter how we choose to go, all roads lead to the same place. The Relays destroyed, Galactic Civilization set back hundreds if not thousands of years, Shepard most likely dead or might as well be dead, and the Normandy stuck on some backwater planet in the middle of no where.
Now Shepard can die, I'm cool with that, kind of expected that. The Normandy can be destroyed, kinda expected that as well. However, I expected us to save Galactic Civilization, not pretty much force everyone to start all over again.
I also expected there to be the possibility that the Reapers would win, and the cycle would continue. Which at this point I would be happier with than the choices I currently have.
You do not understand the key plot of ME3 because you havent' played it.
The Technology Singularity is the key.
Yes. Ten thousand times yes. In fact, I'm tempted to steal and burn two copies to double my lack of buying it.Even if the ending does suck for you, does that mean the rest of it sucks?
I'm not trying to be mean and I merely want to ask:Bomb In My Pants wrote...
OMG, people, just play the game. Even if the ending does suck for you, does that mean the rest of it sucks?
Let go of your capitalistic ideals and give BioWare the benefit of the doubt.....please.