I have survivied. Hahaha
But anyways, did they say anything else about the Organic vs Synthetic stuff? (Still can't believe they're saying that's the main theme)
TamiBx wrote...
Good morning, everyone~!
I have survivied. Hahaha![]()
But anyways, did they say anything else about the Organic vs Synthetic stuff? (Still can't believe they're saying that's the main theme)
lolTamiBx wrote...
Good morning, everyone~!
I have survivied. Hahaha![]()
But anyways, did they say anything else about the Organic vs Synthetic stuff? (Still can't believe they're saying that's the main theme)
Major Swift wrote...
lolTamiBx wrote...
Good morning, everyone~!
I have survivied. Hahaha![]()
But anyways, did they say anything else about the Organic vs Synthetic stuff? (Still can't believe they're saying that's the main theme)welcome back! and no, just what was said last night
It came up, but not in the context that the Starkid, Bioware, and Gamble mention it has. Using the geth as a frame of reference, you see that the first conflict with the quarains was out of self defense. The second (That of ME1) was due to reaper's influence itself. As was the third... And after all that it still ended in peace. Like I said earlier, what the hell are they on about with these statements?Major Swift wrote...
* uses one of these on thread http://www.blogcdn.c...ection-time.jpg lol*
@chmarr, well struggle of organics and synthetics was apparently a major theme throughout the games so it doesn't surprise me (though i still can't see this theme being so big)
DistantUtopia wrote...
The more that I think about it, the more I realize no one is really getting the ending we want
If EA really wants to continue the ME franchise as a number of us speculate, then there HAS to be a default ending; one which will happen no matter what.
*cue blowing up Relays, Shepard dead, etc.*
No matter what we do in ME3, there will always be that one little thing which happens, regardless if Starchild is there or not. And that suddenly depresses the hell out of me...
Major Swift wrote...
exactly, i never really went "oh so organics vs sythetics, this is the main theme" playing any of the games, never even crossed my mind to be honest, like ive said before overcoming impossible odds by working together/similar things to this is what i perceived as a/the major themegorgoth wrote...
Major Swift wrote...
* uses one of these on thread http://www.blogcdn.c...ection-time.jpg lol*
@chmarr, well struggle of organics and synthetics was apparently a major theme throughout the games so it doesn't surprise me (though i still can't see this theme being so big)
When the main enemy is a giant robot squid it will always be a theme. But the reapers never come off as struggling against organics. What they’re doing is coming off more like a child doing its chores; they never once think they won’t win easily. This is where the idea of the main theme being organics vs. synthetics falls flat. The organic vs. synthetics theme seems to be a byproduct of the main story line not the reason for it.
and that is the truth, synthesis would not solve thisSiegdrifa wrote...
*snip*
Giving the same kind of DNA don't offer peace, because conflict doesn't come from DNA, it come from motive, intrest, perspective, motivation.
*snip*
which ones are gone if you can remember? I'll have to look again, and yeah i know it was just that he said "throughout ME" sure it was there in the background but it wasn't that big to justify synthesis off ofLaterali wrote...
He never implied that the struggle of synthetics and organics was the main theme, just that it was a theme. It is. I don't have a problem with him saying it was a theme, it was a pretty major subplot. What I had a problem with is his justification for synthesis being the best choice and the obvious contradictions with Shepard's personality up until that point.
It seems he did some more house cleaning on his twitter page and removed the really bad posts.
chmarr wrote...
DistantUtopia wrote...
The more that I think about it, the more I realize no one is really getting the ending we want
If EA really wants to continue the ME franchise as a number of us speculate, then there HAS to be a default ending; one which will happen no matter what.
*cue blowing up Relays, Shepard dead, etc.*
No matter what we do in ME3, there will always be that one little thing which happens, regardless if Starchild is there or not. And that suddenly depresses the hell out of me...
what you dont relise is that is the mass effect franchise was built around shepard, killing him kills the franchise.
ME cannot go on without shepard being invol;ved at some point or the player is shepard.
shepard is like the unoffical mascot of bioware now.
shepard is not dead, THAT much has been hinted at in ALL the tweets from gamble, jessica etc etc etc.
BUT with me i take the tweets with a pack of salt, everything said then and now all contradict each other so misinformation is at hand as well
Modifié par GroverA125, 26 avril 2012 - 02:47 .
Major Swift wrote...
lmao!!!! some bs happening somewhere:lol:
Laterali wrote...
He never implied that the struggle of synthetics and organics was the main theme, just that it was a theme. It is. I don't have a problem with him saying it was a theme, it was a pretty major subplot. What I had a problem with is his justification for synthesis being the best choice and the obvious contradictions with Shepard's personality up until that point.
It seems he did some more house cleaning on his twitter page and removed the really bad posts.
oh yeah your right thats the one, and yeah it does go against everything so how can that even remotely be "good"/something to work towards/a reward?Laterali wrote...
He deleted the post saying;
"There would be no concept of machine or organic. There would just be life."
That to me was his worst justification. ME lore gushed on the diversity of the galaxy, that all the races could come together on the Citadel, and even though they were different, still have peace. It's a pretty big deal if you have Javik, it's the theme of like 80-90% of the dialogue with him.
Then to say, well everyone in the galaxy wouldn't even know any better if I turned them all against their will, it's probably ok. If they don't know to fight back or complain, it's for the best.
Changing everyone in the galaxy into the hybrid race, goes against everything stated in ME1-ME3.
Siegdrifa wrote...
Laterali wrote...
He never implied that the struggle of synthetics and organics was the main theme, just that it was a theme. It is. I don't have a problem with him saying it was a theme, it was a pretty major subplot. What I had a problem with is his justification for synthesis being the best choice and the obvious contradictions with Shepard's personality up until that point.
It seems he did some more house cleaning on his twitter page and removed the really bad posts.
No, he said syntheic vs organic is THE theme of mass effect.
It is what the fuss is all about since millions of years in the ME lore, it's the very reason the cycle existe.
i always consider the geth as people just like anyone else, i don't care if they are technically synthetic, thats not the way i see them as/judge them as, even with synthesis new conflicts will arise, it doesn't matter if everyone has the same DNA when it comes to differing viewpoints and suchRichard 060 wrote...
IMO, trying to skew the theme of 'everyone putting aside their differences to stand united against the Reapers - Geth included*' into some sweepingly generalised 'organics vs those pesky synthetics that will INEVITABLY destroy us' just seems like someone on the writing team trying too hard to Miss The Point...
*for all practical purposes, the Geth are just another race, regardless of being organic or synthetic. Just because they're not organic, doesn't automatically mean that they're a greater threat to the galaxy than any other faction. One could easily argue that the Krogan have posed the greater ongoing threat historically, yet we're given the choice to actually save them by curing the genophage, rather than just wiping them out. The Geth, on the other hand, have shown restraint, moderation, and a genuine desire to avoid both general hostilities and the risk of destroying themselves and/or their creators, yet we're supposed to just go along with the Catalyst's supposition that they, as synthetics, are ultimately a ticking time bomb that will doom us organics if not eliminated. It's nonsensical.
*snip*
Modifié par Major Swift, 26 avril 2012 - 03:02 .
Phoenix NL wrote...
I apologize if this has been posted already but this article here is the exact reason I have been worried and voicing my concerns about the On/Off campaign:
http://www.bigshinyr.../archives/39905