You're lucky, I don't get to visit real world, only university. Full of unseen academicals, especially if you need to speak to a professor face-to-faceDJBare wrote...
I'm still around and lurking, but I definitely need variety, been editing some videos for my iPad video wallpaper, found a real nice one called rain on glass, the iPad becomes a window you view the rain through,Goodwood wrote...
The thread has fallen asleep!
Oh yeah, I also like to get out and see the real world occasionally, not as interesting as this forum, but the air, that fresh air!
So we can't get the ending we want after all?
#93801
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 01:08
#93802
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 01:15
#93803
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 01:57
KevShep wrote...
Aviditie wrote...
Also, I think flying by the seat of their pants story-telling wise kind of caught up with them. Like with the ending, and the expanation of the reapers. I'd seriously rather have known next to nothing about them than meet reaper child. And the final battle should have been in harbinger. Just... Period. He was your nemesis for the whole second game!!!
Your talking as if you know what BioWare has been up to. You dont know yet...this all looks as if it was planned.
For all we know EA may have not backed down from there dead line DEMAND from bioware. Bioware notices that inorder to make the absolutely best ending possible they would need more time. Bioware gets creative by giving us an ending on time that is to make us speculate what has just happend. This gives Bioware more months to finish a free DLC that may have been planning since October or November. It fits perfectly because it alows Bioware to use indoctrination (something that Shepard has not faced yet) as the ending to MAKE US BELIEVE THAT WE ARE NOT INDOCTRINATED when we are infact indoctrinated by Bioware's artistic intergity while having OUR shepard indoctrinated by the reapers. To indoctrinate YOUR shepard the writers have to also indoctrinate YOU the player with shepard or it does not work!...Period!
The anti-I.T. people have been indoctrinated by artistic intergity. They claim its just bad writing AND CANT FIGURE OUT WHY BIOWARE IS SUPPORTING ARTISTIC INTEGRITY....Sound like they dont see the creativeness from Bioware after all.
*grins* welcome to my theory - I'm not completely mad
#93804
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 01:59
*goes back to watching Cosmos*
#93805
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:16
WHAT THE.... What are they smoking?toffeetrooper wrote...
speculation on a massive scale!
wow i mean really WOW
#93806
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:19
I nearly said something about that during the last conversation, but decided against it at the time.Goodwood wrote...
To the IT people: There is an enormous difference between a testable hypothesis and wild speculation. I suggest you look up the scientific method.
*goes back to watching Cosmos*
But yes, the problem with all the evidence of IT is the fact the evidence is circumstancial.
If evidence, taken away from the argument/conclusion, does not lead a person oblivious to the conclusion to the same conclusion, it's pretty much worthless. IT kind of worked the wrong way around, hypothesis not stemming purely from the observations.
Not to be mean, but that's how it works with science (insert Spoony cameo), and as we proved, I'm a scientist at heart. Even if I do study linguistics, literature and culture. <_<
#93807
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:22
That's the point I was getting at, Atrocity. Personally, the whole hullabaloo surrounding the indoctrination theory is wearing a bit thin.
#93808
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:23
Disreagard.... please and thank you~!
Modifié par Nharia1, 03 mai 2012 - 02:24 .
#93809
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:25
Nharia1 wrote...
Like the fact that the Earth can somehow gain two moons, from one of two sources.... either one of Jupiter's Moons, or one of Mar's...Goodwood wrote...
To the IT people: There is an enormous difference between a testable hypothesis and wild speculation. I suggest you look up the scientific method.
*goes back to watching Cosmos*How we could possibly survive that I've no idea, cause wouldn't anything coming at us at high speeds just crash into us, not get caught within our gravitational pull... right?
It is possible, though highly improbable, that a celestial object coming at Earth at just the right angle, with just the right relative velocity, could be captured in orbit. However, in all likelyhood, that orbit would be unstable and the object would inevitably plunge into our atmosphere and impact the surface, possibly cracking our planet open.
Death and destruction would abound.
#93810
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:27
Nharia1 wrote...
WHAT THE.... What are they smoking?toffeetrooper wrote...
speculation on a massive scale!
wow i mean really WOWSeriously, it's impossible for us to gain another moon.... physicis and all that rot....
you forgot
the op claims it is sattire later on in the thread, if that is the case the op should have thought of a better title.
Modifié par toffeetrooper, 03 mai 2012 - 02:29 .
#93811
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:36
Even if we got a second moon just hanging there, instead of it plungin into us, wouldn't the mass of it **** us up anyhow? Tidal waves? And if the moon affects oceans, chances are it will then also affect wheather drastically, so more problems for all those sorry sods who survived reapers.Goodwood wrote...
Nharia1 wrote...
Like the fact that the Earth can somehow gain two moons, from one of two sources.... either one of Jupiter's Moons, or one of Mar's...Goodwood wrote...
To the IT people: There is an enormous difference between a testable hypothesis and wild speculation. I suggest you look up the scientific method.
*goes back to watching Cosmos*How we could possibly survive that I've no idea, cause wouldn't anything coming at us at high speeds just crash into us, not get caught within our gravitational pull... right?
It is possible, though highly improbable, that a celestial object coming at Earth at just the right angle, with just the right relative velocity, could be captured in orbit. However, in all likelyhood, that orbit would be unstable and the object would inevitably plunge into our atmosphere and impact the surface, possibly cracking our planet open.
Death and destruction would abound.
#93812
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:39
I'm starting to seriously question what this person is smoking... and where I can get some of it(joking). Example:Goodwood wrote...
Nharia1 wrote...
Like the fact that the Earth can somehow gain two moons, from one of two sources.... either one of Jupiter's Moons, or one of Mar's...How we could possibly survive that I've no idea, cause wouldn't anything coming at us at high speeds just crash into us, not get caught within our gravitational pull... right?
It is possible, though highly improbable, that a celestial object coming at Earth at just the right angle, with just the right relative velocity, could be captured in orbit. However, in all likelyhood, that orbit would be unstable and the object would inevitably plunge into our atmosphere and impact the surface, possibly cracking our planet open.
Death and destruction would abound.
It very close..Iucounou wrote...
Nicelillitheris wrote...
Mars
was mostly destroyed, and with the gravitational well gone, its moon
Deimos was hurtled along toward Earth. It ultimately became stuck in
Earth's gravity well, becoming Earth's second moon
try OP, but Deimos has a mean radius of about 6km and is essentially a
captured asteroid. There's no way it would be able to show as a disc of
the size it appears in the end scene of ME3.
What the heck...
#93813
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:45
Agreed, though I would hesitate to call it "wild" speculation since the series itself pretty much has indoctrination as a major theme with the destruction of the Reapers being the main theme.Goodwood wrote...
To the IT people: There is an enormous difference between a testable hypothesis andwildspeculation. I suggest you look up the scientific method.
*goes back to watching Cosmos*
#93814
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 02:47
She is smoking something... or doing something.... And no one's going to believe her when she claims its all a satire, she's waaaaaaaaayyyyyy to serious when she's defending her points... anyone who made that as a satire wouldn't try that hard to defend their posts.... they'd just claim satire from the get go... not on the last page of the thread....toffeetrooper wrote...
you forgotNharia1 wrote...
WHAT THE.... What are they smoking?Seriously, it's impossible for us to gain another moon.... physicis and all that rot....
the op claims it is sattire later on in the thread, if that is the case the op should have thought of a better title.
#93815
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:02
Nharia1 wrote...
She is smoking something... or doing something.... And no one's going to believe her when she claims its all a satire, she's waaaaaaaaayyyyyy to serious when she's defending her points... anyone who made that as a satire wouldn't try that hard to defend their posts.... they'd just claim satire from the get go... not on the last page of the thread....I should know, having done a couple of such pieces elsewhere...
i agree, was just pointing out her claims wich incidently came after some negative "feedback".
#93816
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:03
Wasn't most of the feedback?toffeetrooper wrote...
Nharia1 wrote...
She is smoking something... or doing something.... And no one's going to believe her when she claims its all a satire, she's waaaaaaaaayyyyyy to serious when she's defending her points... anyone who made that as a satire wouldn't try that hard to defend their posts.... they'd just claim satire from the get go... not on the last page of the thread....I should know, having done a couple of such pieces elsewhere...
i agree, was just pointing out her claims wich incidently came after some negative "feedback".
#93817
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:03
DJBare wrote...
Agreed, though I would hesitate to call it "wild" speculation since the series itself pretty much has indoctrination as a major theme with the destruction of the Reapers being the main theme.Goodwood wrote...
To the IT people: There is an enormous difference between a testable hypothesis andwildspeculation. I suggest you look up the scientific method.
*goes back to watching Cosmos*
It's still speculation, and based not on observations but on inferred circumstances, which are derived from a major theme of the series up to that point. It's a synanym to the "god of the gaps" argument, a fallacy wherein we fill the holes in the story with bits of information derived from what has come before. I forget the technical term.
#93818
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:06
Nharia1 wrote...
Wasn't most of the feedback?toffeetrooper wrote...
Nharia1 wrote...
She is smoking something... or doing something.... And no one's going to believe her when she claims its all a satire, she's waaaaaaaaayyyyyy to serious when she's defending her points... anyone who made that as a satire wouldn't try that hard to defend their posts.... they'd just claim satire from the get go... not on the last page of the thread....I should know, having done a couple of such pieces elsewhere...
i agree, was just pointing out her claims wich incidently came after some negative "feedback".
so true, as for what she's smoking i think it might be space
#93819
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:07
MrFob wrote...
Haha, count me in on that one. I just got my second play through to the point where I am supposed to attack TIM's base last Sunday just around 5pm (which was the time to start the turnMEoff period in my time zone). Haven't been able to touch it since then. Instead I went to gog.com and now I am replaying "Lands of Lore: Guardians of Destiny" because I can't bear to touch ME3.
I still have that game, but I haven't been able to get it loaded on my new systems since. Last time was on Win98.
#93820
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:09
The Crucible was really Shepard's sled from when he was a kid.
Anderson rides a Thannix missle into star kid blowing up the Citadel
And the camera pans out to reveal the Star Gazer is inside a snowglobe....
#93821
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:13
#93822
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:13
Waiting for a PLANE home from my holiday in egypt .
Any news since last week weddesday ?
#93823
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:16
firstarioch wrote...
Hello boys and girls !!!
Waiting for a PLANE home from my holiday in egypt .
Any news since last week weddesday ?
Pharoh misses you already. Other than that, nothing noteworthy. Sorry.
#93824
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:16
firstarioch wrote...
Hello boys and girls !!!
Waiting for a PLANE home from my holiday in egypt .
Any news since last week weddesday ?
I would not say so really, just tweets about working hard on EC and Bio Evil Chris on his exciting stay at home holiday... what a lifestyle the gaming industry boasts
#93825
Posté 03 mai 2012 - 03:18
firstarioch wrote...
Hello boys and girls !!!
Waiting for a PLANE home from my holiday in egypt .
Any news since last week weddesday ?
not much, but we just had some crazy space magic speculation ?
give it a read it will help pass the time.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




