Aller au contenu

Photo

So we can't get the ending we want after all?


101103 réponses à ce sujet

#76
CerberusSoldier

CerberusSoldier
  • Members
  • 1 540 messages

Aurora313 wrote...

I gotta say, letting the Reapers win at this point? Not a bad idea.

   


I wish we could I would chose that any day .

#77
GreenSoda

GreenSoda
  • Members
  • 1 214 messages
Ehh this might actually work. *If* BW does it right...not like in, let's say, F3 where Fawkes "doesn't want to cheat you out of your destiny". But you effing immune Fawkes....ahrrg.

Stories can be that much greater without the standard Hollywood happily ever after ending...or not. Let's just wait and see. At this point the cutting of the trial at the beginning bothers me a lot more.

#78
ddv.rsa

ddv.rsa
  • Members
  • 880 messages

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

You not liking it only reinforces the notion of the ending being quite acceptable after all. ^_^


How are these endings a good thing? Tell us.

#79
Creyes one

Creyes one
  • Members
  • 32 messages
Guys dont you get it....the crew that gets stranded on that planet is not a random plantet....its planet were dragon age is set in,...they are the original founders of that land, they have no tech and no contact with anything so they have to adapt to the environment..

#80
VelvetStraitjacket

VelvetStraitjacket
  • Members
  • 1 110 messages
I really think we should all try to attract Bioware's attention and try to change something. I mean, do we really want Shepard's story to end like this? I sure as hell don't. It just feels so cheap.

#81
turian councilor Knockout

turian councilor Knockout
  • Members
  • 1 127 messages
What did people expect no casualties, everyone should die that's the way of war and since they already portrayed the reapers as nearly unbeatable it just make sense that everything is as much f*cked up as possible, take your pick or not.

#82
NovemEnuma

NovemEnuma
  • Members
  • 110 messages

PsychoHitsPeach wrote...

I really think we should all try to attract Bioware's attention and try to change something. I mean, do we really want Shepard's story to end like this? I sure as hell don't. It just feels so cheap.


The game comes out in 1 week. lol

#83
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

turian councilor Knockout wrote...

What did people expect no casualties, everyone should die that's the way of war and since they already portrayed the reapers as nearly unbeatable it just make sense that everything is as much f*cked up as possible, take your pick or not.

I don't mind about civilization being destroyed. It makes sense that we should pay a tragic price to defeat the Reapers.

Its the lack of closure for the characters that irks me. The characters are one of the main draws of the game, and stranding them so they can make a colony is just terrible.

#84
Giga Drill BREAKER

Giga Drill BREAKER
  • Members
  • 7 005 messages
my only problem is that bioware is almost forcing us to mp, i don't want to play mp to get the best ending, I have no problem with mp in general but don't force those who don't want to play it, to play it so they can get the best ending

#85
Aurora313

Aurora313
  • Members
  • 4 616 messages
I at least wanted an ending with Shepard and the LI, sure, he might be dying in her/his arms. But I'd take it at this point!

#86
Capeo

Capeo
  • Members
  • 1 712 messages
Novem, help me out here.

I thought, from reading the script, the merge ending left the galaxy intact. Is that not the case? The endings in the script were very ambiguous. Does you have a link to a better description of them? Feel free to PM or explain if so.

#87
NovemEnuma

NovemEnuma
  • Members
  • 110 messages

Candidate 88766 wrote...

turian councilor Knockout wrote...

What did people expect no casualties, everyone should die that's the way of war and since they already portrayed the reapers as nearly unbeatable it just make sense that everything is as much f*cked up as possible, take your pick or not.

I don't mind about civilization being destroyed. It makes sense that we should pay a tragic price to defeat the Reapers.

Its the lack of closure for the characters that irks me. The characters are one of the main draws of the game, and stranding them so they can make a colony is just terrible.


Mass Effect 4: You travel to said colony and hear the legend of Commander Shepard, from a Matriarch Liara.

#88
turian councilor Knockout

turian councilor Knockout
  • Members
  • 1 127 messages

Candidate 88766 wrote...

turian councilor Knockout wrote...

What did people expect no casualties, everyone should die that's the way of war and since they already portrayed the reapers as nearly unbeatable it just make sense that everything is as much f*cked up as possible, take your pick or not.

I don't mind about civilization being destroyed. It makes sense that we should pay a tragic price to defeat the Reapers.

Its the lack of closure for the characters that irks me. The characters are one of the main draws of the game, and stranding them so they can make a colony is just terrible.

True but i hope Bioware knows better :huh:

#89
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

Capeo wrote...

Novem, help me out here.

I thought, from reading the script, the merge ending left the galaxy intact. Is that not the case? The endings in the script were very ambiguous. Does you have a link to a better description of them? Feel free to PM or explain if so.

All the endings require vast amounts of energy to be spent all across the galaxy. The Relays are the ony things capable, and it seems they are lost in every ending.

#90
Milan92

Milan92
  • Members
  • 11 998 messages
We still don't know for sure if these are really the endings. I really prefer to wait till I finnish the game myself....but I'm worried.

Modifié par Milan92, 28 février 2012 - 01:58 .


#91
xtorma

xtorma
  • Members
  • 5 714 messages
Yea, ill just wait until the game drops to 9.99 and get it. It's kind of funny , we have all this love interest stuff people decry is great because it gives everyone who plays a choice, yet those people who have striven for 2 games to try and make sure shepard has a decent shot at a life, don't get the same consideration.

#92
Nathan Redgrave

Nathan Redgrave
  • Members
  • 2 062 messages
Y'know, an unhappy ending doesn't exactly equate to a poorly-written one, guys. In fact, given the bloody scale of the Reaper threat, one would think that a totally happy ending would be the type more likely to fall under the umbrella of "bad writing."

But you know, I was under the impression that taking control of the Reapers with the Crucible spared the Mass Relays. What's up with that?

EDIT: If someone could PM me with the specific details of the endings, that'd be great.

Modifié par Nathan Redgrave, 28 février 2012 - 01:59 .


#93
VelvetStraitjacket

VelvetStraitjacket
  • Members
  • 1 110 messages

NovemEnuma wrote...

PsychoHitsPeach wrote...

I really think we should all try to attract Bioware's attention and try to change something. I mean, do we really want Shepard's story to end like this? I sure as hell don't. It just feels so cheap.


The game comes out in 1 week. lol


I didn't mean before it comes out :P Like a patch or even a free DLC, but to be honest, at this point I would even pay for a proper happy ending.
Trying would be better than just sobbing/raging in the background.

#94
Kaiser Shepard

Kaiser Shepard
  • Members
  • 7 890 messages

ddv.rsa wrote...

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

You not liking it only reinforces the notion of the ending being quite acceptable after all. ^_^


How are these endings a good thing? Tell us.

Firstly because they are actually an incline when it comes to writing.

Secondly, all the Biodrones disliking it only serves to reinforce that notion; think of it as an argumentum ad populum, but in reverse.

And last of all, I can't help but enjoy the unfolding events on BSN.

#95
Eldan Varen

Eldan Varen
  • Members
  • 61 messages
Of course there should be sacrifices - and there will be! Just look at the devastated planets and the gathered forces. Hundreds of millions have to pay with their lives for this "victory". However, the Normandy getting lost on some remote planet for no particular reason feels more like a contrived device to "spite" Shepard - so that he has to pay a personal price. It's just cheap and very unsatisfying.

#96
Mathias

Mathias
  • Members
  • 4 305 messages
Yeah i'm not pleased by the turn out of these events at all. Bioware has been lying to us this whole time about certain things via tweets and what not. Off the top of my head, someone once asked Casey on Twitter if they can marry their LI, and Casey tweeted "We got you covered."

Oh....sure you do.

#97
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

turian councilor Knockout wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

turian councilor Knockout wrote...

What did people expect no casualties, everyone should die that's the way of war and since they already portrayed the reapers as nearly unbeatable it just make sense that everything is as much f*cked up as possible, take your pick or not.

I don't mind about civilization being destroyed. It makes sense that we should pay a tragic price to defeat the Reapers.

Its the lack of closure for the characters that irks me. The characters are one of the main draws of the game, and stranding them so they can make a colony is just terrible.

True but i hope Bioware knows better :huh:

It would seem not.

From everything I've read, ME3 looks great and I'll have a blast getting to the end. I don't even mind the endings - it makes sense that civilization almost dies to defeat the reapers. I like the idea that we were essentially doomed from the start, but are fighting to give future civilizations a chance. There will be some bumps along the way no doubt, but I reckon I'll thoroughly enjoy the journey to the end of ME3, just like I enjoyed the journey to get to ME3. 

Its such a pity that what is essentially the last scene of this amazing trilogy will be such a let down. Stranding the characters to make a new colony is a poor send off for them and isn't actually feasible.

#98
4ut0b4hn5child27

4ut0b4hn5child27
  • Members
  • 3 502 messages
seriously guys, why you want to have a happy end for Massive invasion of Unknown force that ONLY one person know how to handle and every galaxy around not well prepared?

i think anyone stop thinking of happy ending in this Series.

Remember the ME2 when the council just Ignore and saying 'Sovereign is just GETH SHIP' or the VI that Shepard saw RUN out of Energy', And also Quarian-Geth Dumb Conflict because of 'some Quarian Admiral' selfishnesh?

i already thought that ME 3 will not having Happy ending

With or without having good ending, I STILL LOVE THIS SERIES.

Modifié par 4ut0b4hn5child27, 28 février 2012 - 02:05 .


#99
SonofOrion

SonofOrion
  • Members
  • 25 messages
I'm okay with the relays getting shut down. I'm not okay with our crew getting shafted.

#100
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

ddv.rsa wrote...

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

You not liking it only reinforces the notion of the ending being quite acceptable after all. ^_^


How are these endings a good thing? Tell us.

Firstly because they are actually an incline when it comes to writing.

Secondly, all the Biodrones disliking it only serves to reinforce that notion; think of it as an argumentum ad populum, but in reverse.

And last of all, I can't help but enjoy the unfolding events on BSN.

I'm probably one of the people you'd consider to be a biodrone, and I actually quite like these endings. I applaud the fact that Bioware had the guts to make the Reaper war as harsh and as devastating as they built it up to be.

Its such a shame that their send off for the characters - one of the main reasons people play ME3 - is handled so poorly.