GodWood wrote...
vonSlash wrote...
There's a difference between a "childish wish fulfillment ****** fantasy" ending, a bittersweet ending, and a pointless ending. Pity that Bioware seems to like the third option most.
What's so pointless about them? The Reapers are stopped, the cylce of death has come to an end and the galaxy has been saved.
That has been the essential goal of the ME series.
Also it's not one ending, it's many endings. I know many like to perpetuate the idea that if Shepard dies in all of them then they're essentially all the same but this is completely false. Shepards choices and actions greatly shape the future state of the galaxy and just how many survive.
Yes, the Reapers are stopped. However, I'd hardly call the galaxy saved if galactic civilization falls apart regardless of Shepard's choices.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but how well you've gathered War Assets matters more about how many survive than which ending you choose.
Also, I don't care too much over whether Shepard lives or dies (in fact, I think the endings would all be better with Shepard dead than alive), but since galatic civilization is demolished regardless of what Shepard chooses (which would be the result even if Sheaprd had done nothing and let the Reapers win), then the endings are still, in a sense, pointless and choosing between them, although not totally meaningless, is no more significant than choosing what flavor of ice cream to buy - it matters, but only trivially.