101103 réponses à ce sujet

[CerberusSoldier]

misoretu9 wrote...

CerberusSoldier wrote...

mawdudi wrote...

What's this talk about "no loose ends" in all ME3 endings...in the best paragon ending they show Shep surviving...but nothing about what happens to him next, are we supposed to assume he spends forever alone ?

Also what's the interesting scene after credits ?

  


there is some end scene after the credits. That many of us are not sure what it means . but from what I hear . Is it some old guy talking about creating a colony on some planet . now the only way that can happen is if something bad happens to the SR 2 .

So if my LI will be that lesbian crew member Samantha, does that mean forced impregnation? Wow, not only a let down, but utterly misogynistic!

   


No but it does mean you won't be seeing her ever again as far as Shepard goes . because if the end scene that appears after the credits is right then Shepard gets separted from the SR 2 and something bad happens to it

[DifferentD17]

Tazzmission wrote...

i have a thought on why this may be the way it is and im not saying its bad either but its a shot


the multiple endings couldve been cut do to the multiplayer. now before people go crazy on my statement think of it like this.....

better the endings than the story right?

and its just a thought but also a possibility

Don't say that! Unless you ready your flame shield.
I personally don't care about Multiplayer so that would be horrible.

[Tazzmission]

DifferentD17 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i have a thought on why this may be the way it is and im not saying its bad either but its a shot


the multiple endings couldve been cut do to the multiplayer. now before people go crazy on my statement think of it like this.....

better the endings than the story right?

and its just a thought but also a possibility

Don't say that! Unless you ready your flame shield.
I personally don't care about Multiplayer so that would be horrible.

at first i didnt want mp but honestly i like it.

now bare in mind before you say it no i am not a typical shooter fanboy like the cod nutjobs.

but on a possitive note at least the gameplay for sp is still intact wich imo is more important to me than how the ending go's

and honestly yes i admit they may not be the best but there a hell of alot better than dead space '2s ending even though the game kicked major butt

[GhostlyMaiden]

Has only read this post to keep spoilers to a minimum.

DaftArbiter wrote...

Current information states that regardless of which ending you choose, regardless of whether or not Shep lives or dies, the Normandy crew gets stranded on some random world without tech, Shepard will never see them again, and the galaxy by and large is completely boned for the next 200k years or so without any kind of good spacefaring tech.

So... Xenosaga? In Xenosaga, to stop the gnosis they had to collapse their entire UMN network (which works similar to mass relays, but with more benefits), thus forcing them to rely on older technologies to get by. Kind of hard to be disappointed when this is the ending I was expecting since ME1. I'm impressed BW had the balls to go through with it, rather than pull out some end-all MacGuffin to give the "happily ever after" vibe. I only wanted to get an idea of what at least one ending was though, so back to blacking out for me. Only one week to go. Only one week to go. Only one week to go.   

[Sporothrix]

CerberusSoldier wrote...

misoretu9 wrote...

CerberusSoldier wrote...

mawdudi wrote...

What's this talk about "no loose ends" in all ME3 endings...in the best paragon ending they show Shep surviving...but nothing about what happens to him next, are we supposed to assume he spends forever alone ?

Also what's the interesting scene after credits ?

  


there is some end scene after the credits. That many of us are not sure what it means . but from what I hear . Is it some old guy talking about creating a colony on some planet . now the only way that can happen is if something bad happens to the SR 2 .

So if my LI will be that lesbian crew member Samantha, does that mean forced impregnation? Wow, not only a let down, but utterly misogynistic!

   


No but it does mean you won't be seeing her ever again as far as Shepard goes . because if the end scene that appears after the credits is right then Shepard gets separted from the SR 2 and something bad happens to it

Sorry, I haven't read everything about it, but doesn't it suggest that Normandy crew created a colony (which would much likely means a misogynistic cliche I mentioned above)?

[incinerator950]

Oh look Commander, another dangerous cliche aboard. Thanks, why can't you collect Commemorative plates or something?

Modifié par incinerator950, 29 février 2012 - 10:52 .

[casedawgz]

misoretu9 wrote...

CerberusSoldier wrote...

misoretu9 wrote...

CerberusSoldier wrote...

mawdudi wrote...

What's this talk about "no loose ends" in all ME3 endings...in the best paragon ending they show Shep surviving...but nothing about what happens to him next, are we supposed to assume he spends forever alone ?

Also what's the interesting scene after credits ?

  


there is some end scene after the credits. That many of us are not sure what it means . but from what I hear . Is it some old guy talking about creating a colony on some planet . now the only way that can happen is if something bad happens to the SR 2 .

So if my LI will be that lesbian crew member Samantha, does that mean forced impregnation? Wow, not only a let down, but utterly misogynistic!

   


No but it does mean you won't be seeing her ever again as far as Shepard goes . because if the end scene that appears after the credits is right then Shepard gets separted from the SR 2 and something bad happens to it

Sorry, I haven't read everything about it, but doesn't it suggest that Normandy crew created a colony (which would much likely means a misogynistic cliche I mentioned above)?

I'm pretty sure that Traynor isn't the only lady on the Normandy. There's Ashley, Allers, and Random Crewmen 4-9

[Juniper Mucius]

Tazzmission wrote...

DifferentD17 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i have a thought on why this may be the way it is and im not saying its bad either but its a shot


the multiple endings couldve been cut do to the multiplayer. now before people go crazy on my statement think of it like this.....

better the endings than the story right?

and its just a thought but also a possibility

Don't say that! Unless you ready your flame shield.
I personally don't care about Multiplayer so that would be horrible.

at first i didnt want mp but honestly i like it.

now bare in mind before you say it no i am not a typical shooter fanboy like the cod nutjobs.

but on a possitive note at least the gameplay for sp is still intact wich imo is more important to me than how the ending go's

and honestly yes i admit they may not be the best but there a hell of alot better than dead space '2s ending even though the game kicked major butt

I just wish I could do multiplayer on my own (with my crew).  Lower the difficulty for "singleplayer", you know?  I love more tatical battles, and the Mass Effect games don't have enough of those for me.  I'd love to just have a "wave mode" for fun in Mass Effect 2.  Me and my squad.  I turn off squad power use and take complete and utter control over my squad's ability use.  I don't even mind husks anymore.  Not since I figured out how to kill them.

The tatical gameplay of Mass Effect 2 (and probably 3) is perfect in my opinion.  I love going through a firefight without enemies even hitting me.  Not because it's easy, but because I'm quick to react, and use powers in a combination that keeps enemies down and out while I gun them down.  I'm a Sentinel, so I'm using Throw Field, while my Soldier character (mainly Grunt or Zaeed) is using Concussive Blast.  I then have Miranda/Samara/Jack/Thane kick ass with biotics, combining them with mine, and utterly decimating the field.

But I want to do this stuff *infinitely*.  Why does a wave mode not exist?  #lame

[Tazzmission]

The Free Jaffa wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

DifferentD17 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i have a thought on why this may be the way it is and im not saying its bad either but its a shot


the multiple endings couldve been cut do to the multiplayer. now before people go crazy on my statement think of it like this.....

better the endings than the story right?

and its just a thought but also a possibility

Don't say that! Unless you ready your flame shield.
I personally don't care about Multiplayer so that would be horrible.

at first i didnt want mp but honestly i like it.

now bare in mind before you say it no i am not a typical shooter fanboy like the cod nutjobs.

but on a possitive note at least the gameplay for sp is still intact wich imo is more important to me than how the ending go's

and honestly yes i admit they may not be the best but there a hell of alot better than dead space '2s ending even though the game kicked major butt

I just wish I could do multiplayer on my own (with my crew).  Lower the difficulty for "singleplayer", you know?  I love more tatical battles, and the Mass Effect games don't have enough of those for me.  I'd love to just have a "wave mode" for fun in Mass Effect 2.  Me and my squad.  I turn off squad power use and take complete and utter control over my squad's ability use.  I don't even mind husks anymore.  Not since I figured out how to kill them.

The tatical gameplay of Mass Effect 2 (and probably 3) is perfect in my opinion.  I love going through a firefight without enemies even hitting me.  Not because it's easy, but because I'm quick to react, and use powers in a combination that keeps enemies down and out while I gun them down.  I'm a Sentinel, so I'm using Throw Field, while my Soldier character (mainly Grunt or Zaeed) is using Concussive Blast.  I then have Miranda/Samara/Jack/Thane kick ass with biotics, combining them with mine, and utterly decimating the field.

But I want to do this stuff *infinitely*.  Why does a wave mode not exist?  #lame

you got husks on the mp demo?

also my level 20 asari will turn a wave of enemies into a slaughterhouse i just hit stasis and let multiple troops walk right into it and drop them from a distance with the avenger rifle.

[Juniper Mucius]

Tazzmission wrote...

The Free Jaffa wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

DifferentD17 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i have a thought on why this may be the way it is and im not saying its bad either but its a shot


the multiple endings couldve been cut do to the multiplayer. now before people go crazy on my statement think of it like this.....

better the endings than the story right?

and its just a thought but also a possibility

Don't say that! Unless you ready your flame shield.
I personally don't care about Multiplayer so that would be horrible.

at first i didnt want mp but honestly i like it.

now bare in mind before you say it no i am not a typical shooter fanboy like the cod nutjobs.

but on a possitive note at least the gameplay for sp is still intact wich imo is more important to me than how the ending go's

and honestly yes i admit they may not be the best but there a hell of alot better than dead space '2s ending even though the game kicked major butt

I just wish I could do multiplayer on my own (with my crew).  Lower the difficulty for "singleplayer", you know?  I love more tatical battles, and the Mass Effect games don't have enough of those for me.  I'd love to just have a "wave mode" for fun in Mass Effect 2.  Me and my squad.  I turn off squad power use and take complete and utter control over my squad's ability use.  I don't even mind husks anymore.  Not since I figured out how to kill them.

The tatical gameplay of Mass Effect 2 (and probably 3) is perfect in my opinion.  I love going through a firefight without enemies even hitting me.  Not because it's easy, but because I'm quick to react, and use powers in a combination that keeps enemies down and out while I gun them down.  I'm a Sentinel, so I'm using Throw Field, while my Soldier character (mainly Grunt or Zaeed) is using Concussive Blast.  I then have Miranda/Samara/Jack/Thane kick ass with biotics, combining them with mine, and utterly decimating the field.

But I want to do this stuff *infinitely*.  Why does a wave mode not exist?  #lame

you got husks on the mp demo?

also my level 20 asari will turn a wave of enemies into a slaughterhouse i just hit stasis and let multiple troops walk right into it and drop them from a distance with the avenger rifle.

No, no.  Sorry.  Husks were my most hated thing.  To me, they took a lot of the tactics out of the game.  I hate enemies that just run into cover flailing.  I like more strategic and tatical gameplay, and husks took that away from me.  But now I've learned how to adjust, and I don't even mind them.  I still don't prefer them, because they're just plain annoying, but I don't mind their existence anymore.

[Calliope]

First off, just so we are clear, I fall into the category of one of those people who wants a reasonably happy ending option for Shepard and If there isn't one, I will very likely make sure he dies in the blast since a slow death is not my idea of a good ending.

However, do we really know that this is what occurs in the ending (s) where Shepard survives?

I am seeing a lot of specualtion mixed in with a leak of some endings, all of which range from bittersweet to downright ugly. Add to that some mention of of a cutscene that occurs after the credits that nobody seems to know much about.

Like many leaks that occur in this industry, the endings listed earlier in this thread don't tell us everything. We have limited context for these endings.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think that any of the the endings are going to be sweetness and light, but really, what do we really know about the possible endings of Shepard and the crew of the Normandy?

In the "best" (paragon/reapers destroyed/Shepard presumably stranded, but alive) possible ending the Normandy goes through a wormhole and there are survivors.
Do we know how many survive? No.
Do we know where they end up? No.
Do we know that they are the only ones on the planet? No.

As for Shepard, do we know with absolute certainty that he is trapped on the citadel? As Cerberus Soldier points out, we have no idea at this point what ultimately happens to Shepard.
If he survives, does he have have a plan to get off the Citadel? Is he rescued? Does he, in fact die a horrible and slow death? Or maybe something else happens entirely.

Does the cutscene after the credits give us the closure that we want for Shepard and the Normandy?

We really don't know. I think it may be a little early to start canceling preorders over this, I am just saying.....

[TekFanX]

Short question: Does the space-edition contain the Day-1-DLC?
The one with the prothean?
You know, the guys who knew enough of the relais to build a miniature-version of their own?
Of course, wisdom is lost in war(I guess quite a bit more if your race goes extinct, except for you).
Don't know, but I smell something...or want to...don't know.

How much of the dlc is mentioned in the leaked script/ the prima-guide?

Modifié par TekFanX, 29 février 2012 - 11:19 .

[Degenerate Rakia Time]

i vaguely remember Bioware saying that since this is the end of the trilogy they can go crazy with the endings but from what i'm seeing so far the only thing going crazy is stupidity, we're just being fed the same **** with a slightly different flavor

[incinerator950]

Rakia Time wrote...

i vaguely remember Bioware saying that since this is the end of the trilogy they can go crazy with the endings but from what i'm seeing so far the only thing going crazy is stupidity, we're just being fed the same **** with a slightly different flavor

That doesn't seem plausible, they've been doing it for all of their games for ten ****ing years, oh no!

[Lux]

I hope this is not true.

Trying out bad/sad, neutral and good/uplifting playthroughs is entertaining. Nothing to look for but disappointing endings would be one big slap in the face and a pretty lousy way to end the series.

[DifferentD17]

Rakia Time wrote...

i vaguely remember Bioware saying that since this is the end of the trilogy they can go crazy with the endings but from what i'm seeing so far the only thing going crazy is stupidity, we're just being fed the same **** with a slightly different flavor

If only they made more endings like Paragon , Neutral, and Renegade. If they haven't of course.

[HiroVoid]

TekFanX wrote...

Short question: Does the space-edition contain the Day-1-DLC?
The one with the prothean?
You know, the guys who knew enough of the relais to build a miniature-version of their own?
Of course, wisdom is lost in war(I guess quite a bit more if your race goes extinct, except for you).
Don't know, but I smell something...or want to...don't know.

How much of the dlc is mentioned in the leaked script/ the prima-guide?

Prothy's a soldier.  He knows as much about bulding relays as much as the average joe knows about building a rocket.

[Pazzuzu]

I wanted a Return of the Jedi like ending. The Volus would stand in for the ewoks and Kaiden's ghost instead of Anakin.

[jeinasindorei]

So according to these endings, it doesn't look like BioWare is planning to release DLC that can be done post game.

[TheodoricFriede]

I have never felt more disappointed, more insulted, more betrayed, in my entire life.

I feel as though ive wasted 5 years of my life with this damnable series only to get one big F-you at the end.

Thank you for nothing Bioware.

[Dilos01]

I went to bed, leaving this topic at 50; I wake up finding it almost reaching 90!? 

wowzars!!  I'm betting this'll hit 100 by the end of the day!

[KreagonPL]

@jeinasindorei

O belive me they will.
After installing DLC it will "load " you back before last mission (like in Dragon age origin )

[noxpanda]

Wow 40 pages overnight!

[turian councilor Knockout]

So the good people of BSN haven't given up yet, wonder if it time to troll this thread again 

Modifié par turian councilor Knockout, 29 février 2012 - 11:58 .