Aller au contenu

Photo

NERF TEH PISTOLZ!!!!


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
221 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Kakaw

Kakaw
  • Members
  • 299 messages

lightsnow13 wrote...

darkblade wrote...

Remember how pistols where in ME1?

Yea, they shoulda stayed like that.


They pretty much are.

Pistols in Me1 = OP

Pistols in Me3 = OP


that lazer gun dlc from ME2 was a ma zing.

#102
AreleX

AreleX
  • Members
  • 2 292 messages
hmwp/master marksman all over again

#103
Jdepp

Jdepp
  • Members
  • 2 messages
As someone who mains an Asari Adept who has only a pistol to shoot with, I say bully to this topic.

Every other gun has an advantage over the sidearm; be it from power-per-shot like the shotgun and sniper, or the rapid-fire and high capacity for guns like rifles and SMGs. the pistol is, at best, smack average when it comes to balance. The only thing it has going for it is the weight, which allows those who rely on the CD bonus to tote -only the pistol-.

I can't tell you how many times I've died from an enemy getting close, eating the whole pistol clip, then refusing to die from a frantic Throw or Warp. Or how many times I've debated swapping it out for a light SMG. But that's half the stratagem in building your character kit. Even equipped with just a pistol, a sheet majority of my kills are Biotic.

#104
UK Wildcat

UK Wildcat
  • Members
  • 723 messages
Gotta see all of the other guns to debate whether nerfing is justified. The only thing you can do is draw comparisons in the demo, not ask for retail balancing based on the demo.

#105
Ghost-621

Ghost-621
  • Members
  • 1 057 messages

Haseeo wrote...

you nerf one gun then someone complains about nerfing another and it just goes on and on and on.


Then you have Battlefield 3. Where everything is nerfed except the FAMAS.

#106
Reaver102

Reaver102
  • Members
  • 292 messages
This post is to premature, you're basing your opinions off a demo that has half the unlocks of the real game. For example the smg only has heatsink modifiers in the demo, we don't have any of the damage boosting or other mods which could help balance them out. Pistols are very nice and I always take one in my kit but they are not the end all be all weapons this forum makes them out to be.

#107
HYENA-21

HYENA-21
  • Members
  • 30 messages
Phalanx and Widow are always in my equipment

#108
Natureguy85

Natureguy85
  • Members
  • 3 287 messages
I think there is something wrong with my soldier carrying a carnifex instead of a mattock. But the pistol is just better.

#109
Neverwinter_Knight77

Neverwinter_Knight77
  • Members
  • 2 844 messages
They don't need to nerf pistols.  They need to make the shotguns more powerful.  For example, a Claymore with a high caliber barrel should be able to one-shot something.

#110
Dasher1010

Dasher1010
  • Members
  • 3 655 messages
I'd just buff ARs since the Tempest is a better gun than the Avenger. Pistols don't really need a nerf since they're meant to be good all around with no real weaknesses.

#111
Label07

Label07
  • Members
  • 17 messages

N7 Spectre525 wrote...

Pistols are fine as they are. What is this fascination with nerfing everything in games anymore? P


I agree with OP.  My Phalanx X does loads more damage (close or far) than my Katana X when hitting an enemy point blank, in regards to time frame of shots fired and damage done.

Buff the shotguns, as of now they feel REALLY weak compared to other options the player has.

#112
Elecbender

Elecbender
  • Members
  • 2 427 messages

Neverwinter_Knight77 wrote...

They don't need to nerf pistols.  They need to make the shotguns more powerful.  For example, a Claymore with a high caliber barrel should be able to one-shot something.


It does except an Atlas.  In the right circumstance of course.

Modifié par Elecbender, 04 mars 2012 - 06:35 .


#113
goofyomnivore

goofyomnivore
  • Members
  • 3 762 messages
I don't see the problem with a gold pistol being better than a regular other gun. The Claymore and Rev need a slight buff (maybe make them lighter?).

The Phalanx isn't better than a shotgun up close unless your a Vanguard but that class doesn't really doesn't need a shotgun anymore. Shotgun proc the ammo powers(cryo) so much better than the pistols in cqc. The Phalanx isn't better than the Mattock either at least on PC where the ROF of it is skewed due to mouse clicking. The Mantis sucks. Phalanx owns it.

Modifié par strive, 04 mars 2012 - 06:56 .


#114
Butthead11

Butthead11
  • Members
  • 540 messages
It's easy to tell who in here has unlocked the carnifax and who hasn't

I would like pistols to be nerfed, but if they aren't i still own with the vindicator.

#115
darkblade

darkblade
  • Members
  • 1 194 messages

Cosmo G. Spacely wrote...

Mango370 wrote...

This might sound stupid, but what does nerf mean? :pinched: does it mean something like, make them weaker?


COD term that means we like to complain.

but seriously, you got it right,

nerf = make weaker

buff = strengthen


Why does everyone think CoD = Bad bad bulls***? its ridiciulous, it more annoying then all the nerf threads on this forum that people complain about on this site....this place is pants on head backwards.

#116
TehJumpingJawa

TehJumpingJawa
  • Members
  • 95 messages
The term nerf comes from the "Nerf" brand (in particular their air powered guns that shoot foam bullets).
It's got nothing to do with COD.

#117
Poison_Berrie

Poison_Berrie
  • Members
  • 2 205 messages

Dasher1010 wrote...

I'd just buff ARs since the Tempest is a better gun than the Avenger. Pistols don't really need a nerf since they're meant to be good all around with no real weaknesses.

I've run with a Tempest, but with the recoil that thing is all over the place. The Avenger with a scope has better spread than the Mattock and even without it has a lot less recoil than the Tempest.

#118
Troller79

Troller79
  • Members
  • 148 messages
why the **** do you ppl wanna nerf the weapons in a non pvp game

#119
TexasToast712

TexasToast712
  • Members
  • 4 384 messages
Why would somebody bump this stupid thread?

(Yea, yea, I know, I'm bumping it by telling people not to bump it.)

#120
TehJumpingJawa

TehJumpingJawa
  • Members
  • 95 messages
[quote]Father Alvito wrote...

[quote]Cloaking_Thane wrote...


For Mooks, who cares?[/quote]

Specifically, anything shielded (other than an Atlas) that has been hit with a maxed Energy Drain can immediately be dropped with a Mantis X headshot assuming you built properly.  There is a tangible difference with Atlas kills, but if the Atlas causes a legitimate, immediate problem it should eat a missile anyway.[/quote][/quote]

Mantis X: Energy Drain + headshot = dead
Widow X: Energy Drain + shot = dead

That in my book makes the Widow far superior, and certainly worth the weight hit for a class like the infiltrator.

#121
Neverwinter_Knight77

Neverwinter_Knight77
  • Members
  • 2 844 messages

Troller79 wrote...

why the **** do you ppl wanna nerf the weapons in a non pvp game


You bring up a good point, now that I think about it.

#122
Legato 0021

Legato 0021
  • Members
  • 342 messages
Guys!
Guys!
Guys.....

I have an idea.
Why don't we just nerf....... EVERYTHING!
That EVERYONE! Complains about. (:
So we can all have the same **** co-op experience.

Seriously guys, everything is quite fine how it is now. Everyone uses weapons pretty diveresly, so is there really ANY reason you should be crying about how strong a weapon is? It is within reason and they honestly do not need to be toned down.

And besides.... it is a co-op game, having someone run around with a pistol really doesn't affect your experience since money and experience is shared anyway. Image IPB

#123
Sabbatine

Sabbatine
  • Members
  • 1 694 messages

Sr.Prize wrote...

Whether you nerf the damage or make them heavier; the pistols need to have some kind of disadvantage. As of right now, they're the perfect weapon.


Only someone with a total lack of imagination could come to this conclusion.  I only use pistols on my adept, every other class I play seems to benefit more from another weapon type.

#124
TehJumpingJawa

TehJumpingJawa
  • Members
  • 95 messages

Troller79 wrote...

why the **** do you ppl wanna nerf the weapons in a non pvp game


For the same reason the game's MP has 7 races, 6 classes, dozens of skills, dozens of weapons, dozens of mods, atleast 6 maps, 3 enemy races, 4 difficulty levels, random spawns & random objectives.

Diversity.

If a given weapon is in every way inferior to another weapon, it either shouldn't be in the game (as it's pointless) or it needs rebalancing (as it diminishes gameplay diversity).
Equally, if any given weapon is superior to most other weapons in almost every way, it too needs rebalancing (as it diminishes gameplay diversity).

#125
D.Kain

D.Kain
  • Members
  • 4 244 messages

Legato 0021 wrote...

Guys!
Guys!
Guys.....

I have an idea.
Why don't we just nerf....... EVERYTHING!
That EVERYONE! Complains about. (:
So we can all have the same **** co-op experience.

Seriously guys, everything is quite fine how it is now. Everyone uses weapons pretty diveresly, so is there really ANY reason you should be crying about how strong a weapon is? It is within reason and they honestly do not need to be toned down.

And besides.... it is a co-op game, having someone run around with a pistol really doesn't affect your experience since money and experience is shared anyway. Image IPB


No, everything is not fine. Other weapons suck compared to pistols. What we need to do is not nurf stuff, but buff up the stuff that sucks to the level of cool stuff.