654 réponses à ce sujet

[AlphaJarmel]

Are people really going into denial?

[gxtimer]

I thought the cover art only had male shep?

ie http://www.psuni.com...s/ME3_cover.jpg

[CptBomBom00]

but why he didn't support it with pictures?

[CptBomBom00]

gxtimer wrote...

I thought the cover art only had male shep?

ie http://www.psuni.com...s/ME3_cover.jpg

its two sided cover.

[AlphaJarmel]

gxtimer wrote...

I thought the cover art only had male shep?

ie http://www.psuni.com...s/ME3_cover.jpg

Covers are reversible.

[Dunmer of Redoran]

gxtimer wrote...

I thought the cover art only had male shep?

ie http://www.psuni.com...s/ME3_cover.jpg

Femshep/Manshep covers are reversible.

[Ianamus]

As much as I don't want these rumours to be true, I think we'll have to accept the fact that we're getting Mass Depression 3.

[Elegana]

DaftArbiter wrote...

RiouHotaru wrote...

DaftArbiter wrote...

Tancho wrote...

Who is the second source?

Xoisite. He posted evidence to back up all that he said:

Again, posting pictures to prove physical ownership isn't pictures proving his statements are factual.

His statements coincide with booted developer, SA guy, and leaked scripts. A quadrangle of spoilage.

Anyone could do that. I could easily make a false account, photoshop a picture, and say "Hey, I got a space edition too!" and people will start asking questions. I could easily answer the same exact things that the booted dev, SA guy, leaked scripts, and other Space Edition and I can easily claim "NDA" if I want to or say half of the answer and half "NDA". It's not that hard to copy the same answers of others.

Modifié par Elegana, 28 février 2012 - 11:44 .

[Garrus30]

gxtimer wrote...

I thought the cover art only had male shep?

ie http://www.psuni.com...s/ME3_cover.jpg

it has both cover, you can switch them

[TRISTAN WERBE]

FemShep sucks

[AlphaJarmel]

Elegana wrote...

Anyone could do that. I could easily make a false account, photoshop a picture, and say "Hey, I got a space edition too!" and people will start asking questions. I could easily answer the same exact things that the booted dev, SA guy, leaked scripts, and other Space Edition and I can easily came "NDA" if I want to or say half of the answer and half "NDA". It's not that hard to copy the same answers of others.

The SA guy confirmed it.  So unless the spacer copy is the same as the SA guy, which implies the SA guy somehow got his hands on a space copy, two separate people are confirming details that match with an already known document.

[Dunmer of Redoran]

Elegana wrote...

DaftArbiter wrote...

RiouHotaru wrote...

DaftArbiter wrote...

Tancho wrote...

Who is the second source?

Xoisite. He posted evidence to back up all that he said:

Again, posting pictures to prove physical ownership isn't pictures proving his statements are factual.

His statements coincide with booted developer, SA guy, and leaked scripts. A quadrangle of spoilage.

Anyone could do that. I could easily make a false account, photoshop a picture, and say "Hey, I got a space edition too!" and people will start asking questions. I could easily answer the same exact things that the booted dev, SA guy, leaked scripts, and other Space Edition and I can easily claim "NDA" if I want to or say half of the answer and half "NDA". It's not that hard to copy the same answers of others.

Examine the picture closely. If that is a photoshop, the shading, lighting, blurring, etc. all suggests an extremely professional photoshop.

[Tancho]

Alright, last question: who says the normandy gets stranded no matter what and where is that located. I have scoured every leaked script I can find, something awful, pastebin, etc. I've seen nothing to state specifically that it happens. Have all three sources confirmed this? Where?

[AlphaJarmel]

He has a legit copy. This is beyond question now. New video from IGN confirms a very specific detail mainly Liara being in Miranda's room that wasn't known till now. He could be lying specifically about the ending but that's highly unlikely.

Tancho wrote...

Alright, last question: who says the normandy gets stranded no matter what and where is that located. I have scoured every leaked script I can find, something awful, pastebin, etc. I've seen nothing to state specifically that it happens. Have all three sources confirmed this? Where?

 

Both SA and Spacer confirmed it.  

Modifié par AlphaJarmel, 28 février 2012 - 11:49 .

[Tancho]

Also, to the photoshop. I was on reddit the other day and a guy trolled his brother like this. I believe he was a graphic designer, too, so it was nbd to do it. It looked legit.

[draken-heart]

if he is Legit, then why do we need to play, when we already know how it will end.

• ME series: Shepard's story.
• DA-O: Tale of the wardens and their journey to end the 4th blight.
• DA2 : Hawke's journey from rags to riches (viscount/runaway Champion)

See the pattern, every game had choices that led to the hero being with their LI at the end. IF the option is not in ME3, then there is no reason to get the game as we already know the ending, Shepard dies alone no matter what, and galactic civilization as we know it is destroyed, repers win even if they don't win.

[Elegana]

AlphaJarmel wrote...

Elegana wrote...

Anyone could do that. I could easily make a false account, photoshop a picture, and say "Hey, I got a space edition too!" and people will start asking questions. I could easily answer the same exact things that the booted dev, SA guy, leaked scripts, and other Space Edition and I can easily came "NDA" if I want to or say half of the answer and half "NDA". It's not that hard to copy the same answers of others.

The SA guy confirmed it.  So unless the spacer copy is the same as the SA guy, which implies the SA guy somehow got his hands on a space copy, two separate people are confirming details that match with an already known document.

How did he confirm it? Just by saying "Confirmed"? 

[Tancho]

AlphaJarmel wrote...

He has a legit copy. This is beyond question now. New video from IGN confirms a very specific detail mainly Liara being in Miranda's room that wasn't known till now. He could be lying specifically about the ending but that's highly unlikely.

Tancho wrote...

Alright, last question: who says the normandy gets stranded no matter what and where is that located. I have scoured every leaked script I can find, something awful, pastebin, etc. I've seen nothing to state specifically that it happens. Have all three sources confirmed this? Where?

 

Both SA and Spacer confirmed it.  

Dude, where? Again, words. Please link it.

[CptBomBom00]

I really would like to see some good evidence that supports the ending, and I just watched IGN video about Normandy, I think it doesn't actually contain any spoilers.

[AlphaJarmel]

Elegana wrote...

AlphaJarmel wrote...

Elegana wrote...

Anyone could do that. I could easily make a false account, photoshop a picture, and say "Hey, I got a space edition too!" and people will start asking questions. I could easily answer the same exact things that the booted dev, SA guy, leaked scripts, and other Space Edition and I can easily came "NDA" if I want to or say half of the answer and half "NDA". It's not that hard to copy the same answers of others.

The SA guy confirmed it.  So unless the spacer copy is the same as the SA guy, which implies the SA guy somehow got his hands on a space copy, two separate people are confirming details that match with an already known document.

How did he confirm it? Just by saying "Confirmed"? 

Well he leaked the document that reiterates the Spacer's version.  He then confirmed the Normady crashlanding.

http://forums.someth...5#post401047249 

Tancho wrote...

Dude, where? Again, words. Please link it.

 

Spacer stated in that ridiculously long thead that Liara is in Miranda's room.

Modifié par AlphaJarmel, 29 février 2012 - 12:00 .

[Ricvenart]

I hope the info is wrong, but I won't hold my breath for a number of reasons.
1. Several Sources all claiming the same thing including one which is months old and everything else he said has mostly been confirmed in one way or another (many officially).
2. Downer endings are hugely in Vogue right now and have been for a while. Even with BW being some of the better game writers out there I don't think they are above that trend.
3. They kind of make sense, overall, not with any less forced situations then we've already seen anyway.
4. If this information was false, moderators and staff of Bioware would have already stepped in to say so with a vague comment not saying what is true and what isn't. And even the TC and many others found posting it may be subject to bans and suspension. But they can't ban people for trolling with the truth, imagine the backlash if they did? (See: Klace, less then 24 hours after a claim Chris himself stepped in to make a comment and ban him)

Origin, the mass of free DLC downloads, Day 1 DLC I understood and was partly behind them for it, not a fan of these things but it's better then some alternitives and no missions or story related things have been part of it. Even MP I didn't like the idea, thought it'd be poorly done but didn't begrudge them for it and was pleasantly proved wrong anyway, the demo alone has been a barrel of fun. But if this turns out to be true, if there are 7 non-choices for endings then I doubt I could keep calling myself a BW fan.

[Tancho]

AlphaJarmel wrote...

Elegana wrote...

AlphaJarmel wrote...

Elegana wrote...

Anyone could do that. I could easily make a false account, photoshop a picture, and say "Hey, I got a space edition too!" and people will start asking questions. I could easily answer the same exact things that the booted dev, SA guy, leaked scripts, and other Space Edition and I can easily came "NDA" if I want to or say half of the answer and half "NDA". It's not that hard to copy the same answers of others.

The SA guy confirmed it.  So unless the spacer copy is the same as the SA guy, which implies the SA guy somehow got his hands on a space copy, two separate people are confirming details that match with an already known document.

How did he confirm it? Just by saying "Confirmed"? 

Well he leaked the document that reiterates the Spacer's version.  He then confirmed the Normady crashlanding.

http://forums.someth...5#post401047249 

Tancho wrote...


Dude, where? Again, words. Please link it.

 

Spacer stated in that ridiculously long thead that Liara is in Miranda's room.

Thank you for the link, but I've already seen it. Can you link to the document? Again, I still haven't seen anything for the normandy crash landing.

[Elegana]

AlphaJarmel wrote...

Elegana wrote...

AlphaJarmel wrote...

Elegana wrote...

Anyone could do that. I could easily make a false account, photoshop a picture, and say "Hey, I got a space edition too!" and people will start asking questions. I could easily answer the same exact things that the booted dev, SA guy, leaked scripts, and other Space Edition and I can easily came "NDA" if I want to or say half of the answer and half "NDA". It's not that hard to copy the same answers of others.

The SA guy confirmed it.  So unless the spacer copy is the same as the SA guy, which implies the SA guy somehow got his hands on a space copy, two separate people are confirming details that match with an already known document.

How did he confirm it? Just by saying "Confirmed"? 

Well he leaked the document that reiterates the Spacer's version.  He then confirmed the Normady crashlanding.

That's it? 

First off, with the endings and flashbacks, the SA guy first says "Hackett" appears instead of Anderson. BUT the Spacer says "Anderson" appears instead of Hackett. SA guy then says "Yes. I was mistaken. It was Anderson". That's fishy.

And as for the confirmation, he said "Confirmed" didn't he? So Spacer guy says "Normandy crash lands on a moon" and then he says "Confirmed"? That's like you saying "Shepard gets a sex change" and someone who can claim to have the space edition or to be a booted dev or fired QA tester can simply say "He's right". I'm sorry, but that is not evidence. 

[AlphaJarmel]

Elegana wrote...

That's it? 

First off, with the endings and flashbacks, the SA guy first says "Hackett" appears instead of Anderson. BUT the Spacer says "Anderson" appears instead of Hackett. SA guy then says "Yes. I was mistaken. It was Anderson". That's fishy.

And as for the confirmation, he said "Confirmed" didn't he? So Spacer guy says "Normandy crash lands on a moon" and then he says "Confirmed"? That's like you saying "Shepard gets a sex change" and someone who can claim to have the space edition or to be a booted dev or fired QA tester can simply say "He's right". I'm sorry, but that is not evidence. 

http://forums.someth...5#post401047249 

States Normandy crashlands.  Defers on everything else since it's been awhile.  I would pretty much say that's confirming. He also agreed with Spacer that Merge ending isn't best ending which was thought to be the case up until yesterday.

Tancho wrote...

Thank you for the link, but I've already seen it. Can you link to the document? Again, I still haven't seen anything for the normandy crash landing.

 

http://social.biowar...scussion/19566/ 

This is the thread where Spacer talks about Normandy crashing.  Going through that thread is going to be a nightmare.

http://pastebin.ca/2122325 

Here's the document the SA guy leaked.

Modifié par AlphaJarmel, 29 février 2012 - 12:08 .

[Elegana]

Ricvenart wrote...

I hope the info is wrong, but I won't hold my breath for a number of reasons.
1. Several Sources all claiming the same thing including one which is months old and everything else he said has mostly been confirmed in one way or another (many officially).
2. Downer endings are hugely in Vogue right now and have been for a while. Even with BW being some of the better game writers out there I don't think they are above that trend.
3. They kind of make sense, overall, not with any less forced situations then we've already seen anyway.
4. If this information was false, moderators and staff of Bioware would have already stepped in to say so with a vague comment not saying what is true and what isn't. And even the TC and many others found posting it may be subject to bans and suspension. But they can't ban people for trolling with the truth, imagine the backlash if they did? (See: Klace, less then 24 hours after a claim Chris himself stepped in to make a comment and ban him)

Origin, the mass of free DLC downloads, Day 1 DLC I understood and was partly behind them for it, not a fan of these things but it's better then some alternitives and no missions or story related things have been part of it. Even MP I didn't like the idea, thought it'd be poorly done but didn't begrudge them for it and was pleasantly proved wrong anyway, the demo alone has been a barrel of fun. But if this turns out to be true, if there are 7 non-choices for endings then I doubt I could keep calling myself a BW fan.

1) These sources could easily be in contact with each other, agreeing to tell fans what happens. Those pastebins? He could have easily written them himself.
2) Again, someone could easily write them and say "These are the endings".
3) Elaborate.
4) Or they're not going to bother it while everyone's flipping tables. Right now, there's people who believe the false info and there's people who don't believe it. Maybe they're tired of telling us "This, this, and this is false". Chris Priestly had already said "You rather believe someone who claims to have all the answers over a Dev"? He's discounted the SA guy quite a few times if I recall. But it can be argued that Chris was wrong about a few things concerning ME2.