Tup3xi wrote...
Hardly. I would call those more like "romance scenes".Swehall wrote...
Tup3xi wrote...
"Sex scenes" hardly... which is fine in my books. I don't want a porn simulator. Keep it classy if you must have romances.
Sex scenes, hardly or hardly sex scenes?If you want to watch polygon boobies be my guest. Whatever floats your boat. It doesn't add anything and probably just makes it awkward. I don't have to see everything. Use your imagination and figure it out yourself what they may or may not do.Random citizen wrote...
Tup3xi wrote...
"Sex scenes" hardly... which is fine in my books. I don't want a porn simulator. Keep it classy if you must have romances.
Yeah, its funny how many people thinks (elements of )Erotica = Porn.<_<
If we disregard what my own sexual preferences may or may not be, all art is about representing something in one way or another. Heavily mediated art, like paintings, polygons or even photography and video is something else then direct experience, but it is not supposed to, and can not be that anyway. Its not its purpose.
The purpose is to stimulate the imagination by offering enough to build a mental scenario around.
How do you mean it just makes it awkward? Like, you are not used to immerse in such things? have been told it is evil, dirty or silly? Do you think they cant do it in a way that is serious enough? Or is it awkward because you play games along with people that are not suited to share that little moment with.
Modifié par Random citizen, 29 février 2012 - 05:10 .





Retour en haut






