Aller au contenu

Photo

why raging because of endings


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
10 réponses à ce sujet

#1
xrudix

xrudix
  • Members
  • 246 messages
Hi,

I am really wondering why everyone is raging only about endings, actually they're way better than intro imho. There is no difference if you played pro cerberus or not in me2, you always start on earth with no explanation why? If you look close a lot of choices where not vital, you have the same outcome. Your thoughts?

:devil:

#2
G3rman

G3rman
  • Members
  • 2 382 messages
I'm wondering why you made your own thread what with the fifty others saying the same thing.

#3
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*

Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
  • Guests
Because the destination is a little more important.

#4
Guest_D-roy_*

Guest_D-roy_*
  • Guests
Please keep all discussion about the endiings in the thread made for it.
http://social.biowar...7/index/9512916

Also, please don't respond to spam threads, people. Thank you.

End of line.

Modifié par D-roy, 01 mars 2012 - 08:35 .


#5
What?

What?
  • Members
  • 583 messages
The fact they're contrived and utterly silly?

#6
G3rman

G3rman
  • Members
  • 2 382 messages

D-roy wrote...

Please keep all discussion about the endigns in the thread already made for it.
http://social.biowar...7/index/9512916

Also, please don't respond to spam threads, people. Thank you.

End of line.


BioWare impersonators are about as funny as ME3's endings being fake.

Its not funny because they aren't fake.

#7
xrudix

xrudix
  • Members
  • 246 messages

G3rman wrote...

I'm wondering why you made your own thread what with the fifty others saying the same thing.


Well I am wondering why nobody say that intro is bad, everyone is hyped only because of endings. What is a reason of that? Are there any pro cerberus players? 

PS. this thread is not about endings please read carefully.
:devil:

Modifié par xrudix, 01 mars 2012 - 08:40 .


#8
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*

Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
  • Guests

xrudix wrote...

Well I am wondering why nobody say that intro is bad, everyone is hyped only because of endings. What is a reason of that? Are there any pro cerberus players? 

PS. this thread is not about endings please ready carefully.


If you were here about two weeks ago, people WERE complaining a lot about the intro.

And we all knew about Cerberus long ago. There was complaining about that too.

You're just late to the party.

Modifié par EternalAmbiguity, 01 mars 2012 - 08:40 .


#9
G3rman

G3rman
  • Members
  • 2 382 messages

xrudix wrote...

G3rman wrote...

I'm wondering why you made your own thread what with the fifty others saying the same thing.


Well I am wondering why nobody say that intro is bad, everyone is hyped only because of endings. What is a reason of that? Are there any pro cerberus players? 

PS. this thread is not about endings please ready carefully.
:devil:


Then change the thread title, it says nothing about your main point.  If you look at it from how BioWare portrayed Cerberus in ME2 it was clear TIM was working with you for the sake of a common goal.  In ME3 he has no more use for you.

And whether you supported the Alliance or not, they take you into custody prior to ME3.

And the reason why your specific choice doesn't matter is because BW doesn't want to double their budget and write literally two different games; one supporting Cerberus and one supporting the galaxy at large.

#10
Guest_D-roy_*

Guest_D-roy_*
  • Guests
The intro is one of the worst experiences I've ever had.
I was hoping I could shoot the kid, but nooo! Paragons everywhere.
But we're way past that discussion.

End of line.

#11
MythicLegands

MythicLegands
  • Members
  • 221 messages
ME3, IT DOESN'T MATTER.....the game.