182 réponses à ce sujet

[jmood88]

Cody211282 wrote...

jmood88 wrote...

Cody211282 wrote...

Cazlee wrote...

I saw the M/M scene. They lean close together, but we don't see them kiss. That was as intimate as it got.

Really? That doesn't seem fair, hell even in ME2 we got to see Miranda in a bra.

There's plenty of free porn on the internet if you are that concerned about seeing nudity.

I think you missed the point. I was saying that gays cant see a kiss but the rest of us can see a chick with her top off as she procedes to give us a rather bad friction burn. How is that fair?

How is it not fair? I don't see what any of this has to do with being fair or unfair.

[jmood88]

Slidell505 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

Slidell505 wrote...

As far as DA2 and ME2. Bioware pushes the limits once again.

well its better like this because if they were to go full frontal it would get a adult rating most likely wich is rare in the gaming buisness.

i agree that yes fox blew me1 way out of proportion but i dont need need pixel nudity to enjoy a game let alone a film.

basicly what im saying is if its in great if not no big deal

Was I asking for full frontal? No. Bioware doesn't do anything though, they do fully clothed kissing. It's an M rated game with PG "sex" scenes. Plenty of games have done more, and done it better.

Again, the only people calling them "sex scenes" are people on forums. The developers never promised sex scenes, nor do they refer to them as that. If you're disappointed, then that is your own fault for expecting something that was never hinted at or promised.

[Abirn]

Zkyire wrote...

Show a child getting into a shuttle, only for it to be destroyed seconds later? Perfectly acceptable.

Shooting a fuel tank which then explodes causing a Krogan to be set on fire and burn to death, screaming? Perfectly acceptable.

Show an autistic man being strung up to some machine by his own brother, while he's screaming for help (in tears)? Perfectly fine.

Show Kelly being liquified before your own eyes? Perfectly acceptable.

Showing two adults having consensual sex? Sorry guys, that would be disgusting, so we'll have them make out (briefly) in their underwear.

There are a lot of Americans that agree it's absurd.  But our  redneck mouthbreathers down south have to take the fun out of EVERYTHING.

[MACharlie1]

Abirn wrote...

Zkyire wrote...

Show a child getting into a shuttle, only for it to be destroyed seconds later? Perfectly acceptable.

Shooting a fuel tank which then explodes causing a Krogan to be set on fire and burn to death, screaming? Perfectly acceptable.

Show an autistic man being strung up to some machine by his own brother, while he's screaming for help (in tears)? Perfectly fine.

Show Kelly being liquified before your own eyes? Perfectly acceptable.

Showing two adults having consensual sex? Sorry guys, that would be disgusting, so we'll have them make out (briefly) in their underwear.

There are a lot of Americans that agree it's absurd.  But our  redneck mouthbreathers down south have to take the fun out of EVERYTHING.

I have to disagree with this. You are forgetting the northern suburban, VOCAL mohters and fathers who like to take the fun out of everything. 

"MY CHILD SAW A BOOOOB!!! SCARRED FOR LIFE!" 

[Cody211282]

jmood88 wrote...

Cody211282 wrote...

jmood88 wrote...

Cody211282 wrote...

Cazlee wrote...

I saw the M/M scene. They lean close together, but we don't see them kiss. That was as intimate as it got.

Really? That doesn't seem fair, hell even in ME2 we got to see Miranda in a bra.

There's plenty of free porn on the internet if you are that concerned about seeing nudity.

I think you missed the point. I was saying that gays cant see a kiss but the rest of us can see a chick with her top off as she procedes to give us a rather bad friction burn. How is that fair?

How is it not fair? I don't see what any of this has to do with being fair or unfair.

Well if the romance scenes are there for eye candy and not emotional conection then it should be the same level all around. If the m/m options all fall into the "gaurus headbump" type of scene and the streight falls into "maranda topless" ones then it seems like the m/m ones were tonned down as to not offend people who wouldn't have gone down that path anyway.

[Abirn]

MACharlie1 wrote...

Abirn wrote...

Zkyire wrote...

Show a child getting into a shuttle, only for it to be destroyed seconds later? Perfectly acceptable.

Shooting a fuel tank which then explodes causing a Krogan to be set on fire and burn to death, screaming? Perfectly acceptable.

Show an autistic man being strung up to some machine by his own brother, while he's screaming for help (in tears)? Perfectly fine.

Show Kelly being liquified before your own eyes? Perfectly acceptable.

Showing two adults having consensual sex? Sorry guys, that would be disgusting, so we'll have them make out (briefly) in their underwear.

There are a lot of Americans that agree it's absurd.  But our  redneck mouthbreathers down south have to take the fun out of EVERYTHING.

I have to disagree with this. You are forgetting the northern suburban, VOCAL mohters and fathers who like to take the fun out of everything. 

"MY CHILD SAW A BOOOOB!!! SCARRED FOR LIFE!" 

Oh god I forgot the soccer moms.   I HATE soccer moms.  

[Stokie Stallion]

cant beat seeing liaras, ashley or femsheps bum me1 did it right

[TheKillerAngel]

Han Shot First wrote...

rob593 wrote...


How can you say they add nothing to the story when during the scene the elves (and dwarves) tell the story of the Elf and the Human who fell in love. highlighting the unlikely relationship between a witcher and a sorceress?

furthermore, shortly after the scene while in the same setting you and Triss discuss what can, if you so choose be a pivotal moment in both Geralt and Triss' lives. (Wether to leave everything you are doing behind and leave toghever)

Perhaps if you read more into the scene direction and understood the purpose behind what you are doing there and why, it would open your eyes.
It's not like its one of the most important scenes for character developement or anything. :S

The scene with Triss in the pond started off good, minus Geralt's lecherous grunting in lieu of actual dialogue, and Triss' moaning while she is undressing. It would have been a good scene overall though had they just cut it at the moment that they both are kissing nude in the water. Instead it later cuts back to Geralt plowing her from behind, as if we already didn't get the point that they were going to screw.

All of the Witcher's sex scenes at some point go over the top. They're all a little tasteless, which I'm cool with, I just think the Witcher 2 is a poor example of a direction ME3 should have gone in with the romance scenes.

To me whether or not nudity is gratuitous depends on whether it is part of the story or character development, and feels natural in the scene, or if it just there to titilate the viewer. The intent of the filmmakers (or game designers, in this case) is what is important, and the Witcher often crosses over into the latter.

You captured my sentiments EXACTLY.

[Matt VT Schlo]

Kilshrek wrote...

Why is it called a sex scene when there is no sex? Really.

Cause Canadians are even more uptight about body parts than Americans! 

Off to watch Porn and feel better about myself

[tw3301]

i heard the M/M is something like this youtu.be/JagzGOr5AhI 

Modifié par tw3301, 01 mars 2012 - 06:30 .

[CitizenSnips]

Dry humping scene.

It's like sex for middle schoolers.

[OneDrunkMonk]

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

Dry humping scene.

It's like sex for middle schoolers.

This.

Also I expect the dialog to be somethging like this:

"Look, can we make this quick? EDI tells me that 6732 human lives are being lost to the Reapers every minute and I'd really like to get off before more than 35,000 die."

[Volus Warlord]

Zkyire wrote...

Volus Warlord wrote...

Go watch porn..

Go watch an action movie. =P

Action is one of the reasons I play the game. I look at the cover and I see guns. Guns = action. Yes, there is some obligatory hot chick and an alien freak here or there, but I'll take 20 hours of action over 2 minutes of pixelated romance.

[Zkyire]

TheKillerAngel wrote...

Han Shot First wrote...

rob593 wrote...


How can you say they add nothing to the story when during the scene the elves (and dwarves) tell the story of the Elf and the Human who fell in love. highlighting the unlikely relationship between a witcher and a sorceress?

furthermore, shortly after the scene while in the same setting you and Triss discuss what can, if you so choose be a pivotal moment in both Geralt and Triss' lives. (Wether to leave everything you are doing behind and leave toghever)

Perhaps if you read more into the scene direction and understood the purpose behind what you are doing there and why, it would open your eyes.
It's not like its one of the most important scenes for character developement or anything. :S

The scene with Triss in the pond started off good, minus Geralt's lecherous grunting in lieu of actual dialogue, and Triss' moaning while she is undressing. It would have been a good scene overall though had they just cut it at the moment that they both are kissing nude in the water. Instead it later cuts back to Geralt plowing her from behind, as if we already didn't get the point that they were going to screw.

All of the Witcher's sex scenes at some point go over the top. They're all a little tasteless, which I'm cool with, I just think the Witcher 2 is a poor example of a direction ME3 should have gone in with the romance scenes.

To me whether or not nudity is gratuitous depends on whether it is part of the story or character development, and feels natural in the scene, or if it just there to titilate the viewer. The intent of the filmmakers (or game designers, in this case) is what is important, and the Witcher often crosses over into the latter.

You captured my sentiments EXACTLY.

Everytime we have a cutscene where Shepard is about to shoot someone; it should fade to black before anything actually happens because we already got the jist of what's going on.

[Volus Warlord]

Zkyire wrote...

Everytime we have a cutscene where Shepard is about to shoot someone; it should fade to black before anything actually happens because we already got the jist of what's going on.

But the blood is what makes it gratifying. Lol.

[chester013]

The sheer hilarity of fox news' reaction to ME1 (omg it's porn! Somebody think of the children) is worth putting a graphic* sex scene in.

*showing a part of the body not normally covered by a thick Argyle sweater or workman's overalls

"Somebody think of the children!" is a trademark of Fox news and it's subsidiaries, this does not affect your rights to uninformed moral outrage.

[Mr_Dots]

To be fair, it must be really odd animating a sex scene. Even so, as someone who had to endure the Indigo Prophecy/Fahrenheit Simon Says sex scene, I can't say much is lost. If anything, the level of nudity on offer isn't as important as the impact it has on the player. If you only view a sex scene as the level of nudity on offer, then it has lost any emotional meaning.

Of course, it could be possible that bioware don't actually care that much about the sex scenes, but I'm just going to assume that the level of nudity isn't as important as the players reaction to the scene.

Modifié par Mr_Dots, 01 mars 2012 - 07:03 .

[DextroDNA]

Anyone get me a link for this leaked scene?
(if it's a gay one, don't bother. If lesbian, go ahead)

Modifié par RussianZombeh, 01 mars 2012 - 07:11 .

[XDMMX]

Zkyire wrote...

Show a child getting into a shuttle, only for it to be destroyed seconds later? Perfectly acceptable.

Shooting a fuel tank which then explodes causing a Krogan to be set on fire and burn to death, screaming? Perfectly acceptable.

Show an autistic man being strung up to some machine by his own brother, while he's screaming for help (in tears)? Perfectly fine.

Show Kelly being liquified before your own eyes? Perfectly acceptable.

Showing two adults having consensual sex? Sorry guys, that would be disgusting, so we'll have them make out (briefly) in their underwear.

Thats because Conservative religious zealots control everything in America, there usually ok with showing scenes with torture and murder, but it's an unforgivable sin to ever show any kind of nudity, not surprisingly, Conservatives are perfectly fine with supporting the torture of POW's as long as you label them "terrorist".

Modifié par XDMMX, 01 mars 2012 - 07:26 .

[CitizenSnips]

XDMMX wrote...

Zkyire wrote...

Show a child getting into a shuttle, only for it to be destroyed seconds later? Perfectly acceptable.

Shooting a fuel tank which then explodes causing a Krogan to be set on fire and burn to death, screaming? Perfectly acceptable.

Show an autistic man being strung up to some machine by his own brother, while he's screaming for help (in tears)? Perfectly fine.

Show Kelly being liquified before your own eyes? Perfectly acceptable.

Showing two adults having consensual sex? Sorry guys, that would be disgusting, so we'll have them make out (briefly) in their underwear.

Thats because Conservative religious zealots control everything in America, there usually ok with showing scenes with torture and murder, but it's an unforgivable sin to ever show any kind of nudity, on the other hand, Conservatives are perfectly fine with supporting the torture of POW's as long as you label them "terrorist".

Nipples are the devil's eyeballs.

[ODST 3]

Damn, I was hoping FemShep would show her ass again.

[philippe willaume]

Well sex scene should be designed to add something to the story.
If you take Spartacus gods of the arena, the epitomy of gratuitous violence and sex (which is fine by me),
You do have at least two sex scene that are capital to the story. Ie Lucretia + Crixus and Mellita + Ganiccus.

As for being ultra graphic, so there is no need for the ME1 elevator music and someone with German accent and a mullet, in a blue overall telling Sheppard that he/she came to fix the washing machine.
Nor do we need the confession of a <insert a profession that you can find in London and makes you see people a lot> /carry on Emmanuel approach

It really can be done in sensible way; IE without being hard core hentai or silly pre-Maggie well to be pseudo rowdiness.

Phil

PS and once and a while some kind affection demonstration after the deed is done would be nice.

[ODST 3]

XDMMX wrote...
Thats because Conservative religious zealots control everything in America, there usually ok with showing scenes with torture and murder, but it's an unforgivable sin to ever show any kind of nudity, not surprisingly, Conservatives are perfectly fine with supporting the torture of POW's as long as you label them "terrorist".

You overestimate the power of these so-called puritans. Bioware may not have had the courage to put ****** in this game but there are plenty out there for you to see.

[husky husk]

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

XDMMX wrote...

Zkyire wrote...

Show a child getting into a shuttle, only for it to be destroyed seconds later? Perfectly acceptable.

Shooting a fuel tank which then explodes causing a Krogan to be set on fire and burn to death, screaming? Perfectly acceptable.

Show an autistic man being strung up to some machine by his own brother, while he's screaming for help (in tears)? Perfectly fine.

Show Kelly being liquified before your own eyes? Perfectly acceptable.

Showing two adults having consensual sex? Sorry guys, that would be disgusting, so we'll have them make out (briefly) in their underwear.

Thats because Conservative religious zealots control everything in America, there usually ok with showing scenes with torture and murder, but it's an unforgivable sin to ever show any kind of nudity, on the other hand, Conservatives are perfectly fine with supporting the torture of POW's as long as you label them "terrorist".

Nipples are the devil's eyeballs.

 

[sorentoft]

For once I was hoping on a full-fledged por- ahem. Good graces there is no loving in this game.