231 réponses à ce sujet

[Aimi]

didymos1120 wrote...

And if they don't give out a 10/10? What will you be saying then?

"ME3 sucked so much that they couldn't even successfully bribe IGN by giving one of their employees a speaking role in the game lololol"?

[Cody211282]

AxisEvolve wrote...

>2012

>Still using Hipster as a derogatory term.

That's because they are still around

[bboynexus]

Oh, yes, because a 9 or 9.5 absolutely must mean the game is ****.

Modifié par bboynexus, 02 mars 2012 - 05:23 .

[Cody211282]

daqs wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

And if they don't give out a 10/10? What will you be saying then?

"ME3 sucked so much that they couldn't even successfully bribe IGN by giving one of their employees a speaking role in the game lololol"?

Ya IGN is going to be way to biased to reveiw this game fairly.

[Hunter of Legends]

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...

Hunter of Legends wrote...

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...

CombustiblePanda wrote...

I don't trust game reviews, I prefer to have my own opinion on a game. Although I think Mass Effect 3 is going to be a good game, I want to get a chance to play it before making a final verdict.
( For instance, Modern Warfare 3 is a very good example of why you shouldn't trust "professional" reviews)

Yes it was not a bad game I give it 8/10.

ME3 storywise: 5
ME3 gameplaywise: 9

9+5 = 14
14/2 = 7

YOu mean MW3?

Yes, each game should be scored with its own genre merits.

If you gave MW3 an 8/10 I see no reason ME3 shouldn't get a 10/10.

MW3 was horrible.

[Dave Exclamation Mark Yognaut]

daqs wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

And if they don't give out a 10/10? What will you be saying then?

"ME3 sucked so much that they couldn't even successfully bribe IGN by giving one of their employees a speaking role in the game lololol"?

[AxisEvolve]

Cody211282 wrote...

AxisEvolve wrote...

>2012

>Still using Hipster as a derogatory term.

That's because they are still around

They will always be around and people will always find something to label someone a "hipster" for. Trying to be cool? Hipster. Not trying to be cool? Hipster.

Most people have grown up from using that phrase.



Back to on topic: Yeah reviews. Mass Effect 3. Journalists.. Cool.

[Nathan Redgrave]

OmegaSpartan91 wrote...

 I hope at least IGN gives a deserving 10/10 in a while. It seems reviews are kicking in and some Polish reviewers are giving 9's and 9.5's to this game.

THAT sucks. I'm sure, even without playing it, that it deserves a perfect score.

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume this is tongue-in-cheek.

[didymos1120]

Cody211282 wrote...

daqs wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

And if they don't give out a 10/10? What will you be saying then?

"ME3 sucked so much that they couldn't even successfully bribe IGN by giving one of their employees a speaking role in the game lololol"?

Ya IGN is going to be way to biased to reveiw this game fairly.

Who the hell cares anyway?  It's IGN ferchrissakes.

[Cody211282]

didymos1120 wrote...

Cody211282 wrote...

daqs wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

And if they don't give out a 10/10? What will you be saying then?

"ME3 sucked so much that they couldn't even successfully bribe IGN by giving one of their employees a speaking role in the game lololol"?

Ya IGN is going to be way to biased to reveiw this game fairly.

Who the hell cares anyway?  It's IGN ferchrissakes.

True. The only thing to worry about is that they get put up on metacritic, but I usualy only check out the user reviews anyway.

[Cody211282]

AxisEvolve wrote...

Cody211282 wrote...

AxisEvolve wrote...

>2012

>Still using Hipster as a derogatory term.

That's because they are still around

They will always be around and people will always find something to label someone a "hipster" for. Trying to be cool? Hipster. Not trying to be cool? Hipster.

Most people have grown up from using that phrase.



Back to on topic: Yeah reviews. Mass Effect 3. Journalists.. Cool.

Eh its still a fitting lable for people who are snobby and spend a ton of money to look poor and are pretentious as hell.

[AxisEvolve]

Cody211282 wrote...
Eh its still a fitting lable for people who are snobby and spend a ton of money to look poor and are pretentious as hell.

Fair enough.. I've never heard it justified in that way. I always thought it's the one's applying labels that seem snobby, but I get where you're coming from.

[future_usmc]

I probably won't be giving it a perfect score either. I already know the combat rolling in this game already dropped at least 1.5 on my personal rating system. The last game I rated perfect scores were Kingdom Hearts 1 and 2. I love those game religiously and don't care what anyone else says about them.

[CROAT_56]

I gave the demo a 8.5 and said the game would most likely be a 9.5 but i doubt it will hit 10

[mogonk]

Cobra5 wrote...

You're sure a game you haven't played deserves a 10?

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the reason for Bioware's decline.

[Zombie Darwin]

OmegaSpartan91 wrote...

 I hope at least IGN gives a deserving 10/10 in a while. It seems reviews are kicking in and some Polish reviewers are giving 9's and 9.5's to this game.

THAT sucks. I'm sure, even without playing it, that it deserves a perfect score.

Not that I care, I already have my CE preordered. But I want more people to know how great this game is so we can get more sagas with this quality from BioWare.

No game deserves a 10/10. ME3 will probably get a 9-9.5 on most review sites the same way ME2 did.

[CenturyCrow]

hex23 wrote...

Will you morons stop saying "HURR DURR NO GAME IS PERFECT THEREFORE IT DOESN'T DESERVE PERFECT SCORES".

Perfect score =/= perfection. It means it's considered the best on whatever scale/measurement/grading system they're using.

There is no perfect scale to measure a game. Even if there was some official 'standard' to grade games, it's all opinions. Some opinions are worth more than others. Some opinions will be worth less; for example your opinion that we're morons is meaningless. Anybody who has already pre-ordered the game, isn't likely to change their mind based on any review; they've already placed a bet and laid their money down. A bad review won't get anyone a refund.

There will be lots of reviews of this game. Some of them will be honest criticisms and tell us the flaws and some won't. I'm looking for reviews that see things different than I do, that find both good and bad. Eventually, I'll compare my opinion against others.

[Kaiser Arian XVII]

Hunter of Legends wrote...

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...

Hunter of Legends wrote...

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...

CombustiblePanda wrote...

I don't trust game reviews, I prefer to have my own opinion on a game. Although I think Mass Effect 3 is going to be a good game, I want to get a chance to play it before making a final verdict.
( For instance, Modern Warfare 3 is a very good example of why you shouldn't trust "professional" reviews)

Yes it was not a bad game I give it 8/10.

ME3 storywise: 5
ME3 gameplaywise: 9

9+5 = 14
14/2 = 7

YOu mean MW3?

Yes, each game should be scored with its own genre merits.

If you gave MW3 an 8/10 I see no reason ME3 shouldn't get a 10/10.

MW3 was horrible.

If I want to enjoy shooting I play COD and similar games. If I want to enjoy Roleplaying I play Bioware, Bethesda etc. games.
You don't have proper judgement.

[Luigitornado]

Why do you people care if IGN reviews the game "fairly?"

If you really need a number to tell you if ME3 is worth a purchase, then look at multiple reviews. Why even bother coming to this forum if you are unsure if you want ME3? Go spend your time elsewhere.

[didymos1120]

mogonk wrote...

Cobra5 wrote...

You're sure a game you haven't played deserves a 10?

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the reason for Bioware's decline.

Oh, please.  People like the OP are hardly a Bioware-exclusive phenomenon.

[Hunter of Legends]

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...

Hunter of Legends wrote...

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...

Hunter of Legends wrote...

Jedi Sentinel Arian wrote...

CombustiblePanda wrote...

I don't trust game reviews, I prefer to have my own opinion on a game. Although I think Mass Effect 3 is going to be a good game, I want to get a chance to play it before making a final verdict.
( For instance, Modern Warfare 3 is a very good example of why you shouldn't trust "professional" reviews)

Yes it was not a bad game I give it 8/10.

ME3 storywise: 5
ME3 gameplaywise: 9

9+5 = 14
14/2 = 7

YOu mean MW3?

Yes, each game should be scored with its own genre merits.

If you gave MW3 an 8/10 I see no reason ME3 shouldn't get a 10/10.

MW3 was horrible.

If I want to enjoy shooting I play COD and similar games. If I want to enjoy Roleplaying I play Bioware, Bethesda etc. games.
You don't have proper judgement.

There are far better shooters out there.

MW3 is not one of them.

[tetrisblock4x1]

weirdopo wrote...

Just to let you know, OP, 9 or 9.5/10 are still great scores.

A game like Mass Effect needs serious flaws to be less than 9.0/10... lesser advertised games on the other hand don't get it so good.

And games should be rated according to other games, not some arbitrary definition of perfection. Doom in 1993 probably got 10/10 from everyone because it was just the best FPS of it's time by a large margin.

[Funkcase]

Because the games not a 10 the reviewer is a hipster? *Sigh* People really chuck around labels too much.