231 réponses à ce sujet

[Baal Sagoth]

Volus Warlord wrote...

Polish reviewers? Lol....?

I would say they are more accurate and honest 'cause noone cares about them and no publisher or developer will try to make influence (sometimes called corruption) on them.

[withneelandi]

Call me crazy, but i'm guessing if you are one of the millions of Polish speaks in the world, you probably care quite a lot about Polish reviewers......

If they happen to be good Polish reviewers, their oppinion is as valid as the American, French or Argentinian reviewers.

[Spaghetti_Ninja]

What nonsense. ME2 got a 9.6, which sounds about right to me. No game is perfect, but some are close to perfect.

If ME3 is as good as ME2 it will get the recognition it deserves. So just wait and see.

[Il Divo]

Personally, I think all review scores should be cast into the fire. They tell me pretty much nothing about an experience, aside from how much someone might have enjoyed it, which is ten times more effective with actual words when they can clearly explain where the game has so obviously succeeded.

Modifié par Il Divo, 02 mars 2012 - 11:33 .

[MikeDraws567]

From what I hear, there are still problems with facial animations, mediocre level design and very low texture qualities. Also, I think a reviewer has to consider whether this game would still deserve the score they give it in five years time. Given that the texture quality is low NOW, I imagine it'll look worse in the future. 9 out of 10 is an incredibly high score, but personally I'd prefer to READ the (non-spoilery) review and not just skip to the score.

[CerberusSoldier]

At best from what I know I say it deserves no better than a 8.0 . but you will all soon learn why

[mopotter]

Cobra5 wrote...

You're sure a game you haven't played deserves a 10?

Yes.  I don't really pay attention to official game critics.  I''ll make my own decision after I play it and rate it myself on Amazon.    then critique it.  

[Phaedon]

Volus Warlord wrote...

Polish reviewers? Lol....?

Yeah, like from Poland. It's a country. And people live in it. And reviewers live in it.

You know, Poland.

Modifié par Phaedon, 02 mars 2012 - 11:55 .

[rammsoldat]

i know its a troll thread but personally ive not trusted reviews for a very long time. The fact that legitamate reviews were saying dragon age 2 was good does nothing to restore my faith.

[DarthCaine]

Don't worry, EA will make sure to pay up for 10/10s

[Finis Valorum]

If they don't fix the sickening FOV it should get a 0/10 for not being playable, otherwise I'd say a 6.5 maybe 7 seems to fit the PC version best.

[apoc_reg]

9 and 9.5 sucks and it deserves a 10.... ok.

You my friend are the definition of a fanboy, you havent even palyed it?!?!!!!

[Phaedon]

FitScotGaymer wrote...
A 9 out of 10 if it were an exam would be an A+. Are you telling us that you would be fuming at getting an A+ in an exam? That ud expect an A++ or an A+++? Are you serious right here?

School exams and video game online reviews have different rates of infaltion.

Also, please don't assume that the entirety of the planet employs or even approves of the horrid A,B,C rating system. Different educational systems have different infaltion and different conversion rates.

Anyway, I don't see why the OP is complaining. Online press has different inflation rates than print press. There haven't been any reviews accepted into Metacritic yet, so to complain about the score being too low doesn't make any sense to me. 

The OP's standards on gaming reviews seem to originate by metascores. A metascore  has yet to made.

[Severyx]

9.5? Pfft. Those reviewers must frequent these forums.

[Phaedon]

DarthCaine wrote...

Don't worry, EA will make sure to pay up for 10/10s

Lol, hello there, Zulu. Nice to see you reincarnated.

[AkiKishi]

I'm sticking with 8.5 unless something like a big techinical issue comes up.Every review is just an opinion that's why you need a lot of them before you can accurately judge a game.

[Sidney]

The problem with reviews now is that they've been inflated so much that the OP is right in a way, a 9/10 isn't stellar and god help us an 8.5/10 is almost surely a failure.

Yes, yes, the narrative of reviews matters but those numbers do too especially now with aggregators like Metacritic. For a lot of folks, the only reason to big into the narrative is if those scores are high enough to warrant your interest and at this point an "80" usually won't draw much attention.

[Phaedon]

Sidney wrote...

The problem with reviews now is that they've been inflated so much that the OP is right in a way, a 9/10 isn't stellar and god help us an 8.5/10 is almost surely a failure.

But how is that a problem? Metacritic not only recognizes the inflation and changes their standard depending on it, they even go as far as to differentiate the inflation and inflated average between movie reviewers and game reviewers.

http://www.metacriti...bout-metascores 

[Halo Quea]

You're likely to get a more accurate and honest account from one of the You Tube reviewers than the so called professional reviewers.

[Dionkey]

Not sure if OP is trolling or not, but in case you're not: you're an idiot. Seriously, no game deserves a 10 and IGN hands out 9s and 10s to games that don't deserve it. You should have to fight for every inch of that score, not just get it handed to your because the reviewer had fun with the game.

[AkiKishi]

Sidney wrote...

The problem with reviews now is that they've been inflated so much that the OP is right in a way, a 9/10 isn't stellar and god help us an 8.5/10 is almost surely a failure.

Yes, yes, the narrative of reviews matters but those numbers do too especially now with aggregators like Metacritic. For a lot of folks, the only reason to big into the narrative is if those scores are high enough to warrant your interest and at this point an "80" usually won't draw much attention.

Well if you want a compartive I gave DA2 a 4.

[Dionkey]

Phaedon wrote...

DarthCaine wrote...

Don't worry, EA will make sure to pay up for 10/10s

Lol, hello there, Zulu. Nice to see you reincarnated.

C'mon, it wouldn't be the first time EA or others have paid reviewers to bump their games up. DAII was evidence of that, and outside of EA, see the Kane & Lynch fiasco with Gamespot.

[bino1191]

10/10 ??? hahah ME3 max 8.5/10 !!

[Phaedon]

Dionkey wrote...
C'mon, it wouldn't be the first time EA or others have paid reviewers to bump their games up. DAII was evidence of that, and outside of EA, see the Kane & Lynch fiasco with Gamespot.

Is this a joke? Dragon Age 2's metascore is 5% above Metacritic average. Had we removed inflation, it'd score a 55% or so.

see the Kane & Lynch fiasco with Gamespot. 

Lol, people reading reviews from the same place that's selling the game.

Modifié par Phaedon, 02 mars 2012 - 12:19 .

[Dionkey]

[quote]Phaedon wrote...
Is this a joke? Dragon Age 2's metascore is 5% above Metacritic average. 
[/quote]
Yes, because the other, smaller reviewers exposed how bad it was. The IGN review, among others, praised the game for many aspects and completely butchered the actual quality of the game.
[quote]Phaedon wrote... 
see the Kane & Lynch fiasco with Gamespot. [/quote]
Lol, people reading reviews from the same place that's selling the game.
[/quote]I really hope that was you just making a joke and not you not knowing that Gamespot is entirely separate from GAMESTOP.