Ksandor wrote...
Eat rotten fish and fully experience it before judging it. I get the idea. You can't judge serial killers before you kill somebody. You cannot judge drug addiction before you use drugs. You can't sue a dirty cop before you become a cop. You can't criticize a game before playing. But you are encouraged to pre-order it. Yep. Definetly get it. With that logic nobody can criticise anbody. Because nobody can be at everybody's shoes and nobody can experience everything, we are not omniscient. So go there, buy it!
Your expertise at spouting inapplicable allegories into digital format is inspiring. However, neither are analogical to experiencing a story. I could go through your post and individually sift through each and every example to explain why, but doing so would be semantics, and I am convinced that you know better and are simply being obtuse because that is what cynics do when they are at a logical end. Your entire post was, sadly, a waste of your time and only did you a personal disservice.
Naturally, if you come across rotten fish you wouldn't eat it. So I suggest the same for you: if you really think the game is that bad, do yourself a favor and avoid it. Play Angry Birds instead.
@KMYash: I am not attacking everyone, per se. Only those that seem to think that they have the definitive understanding of ME3 based on some bits of data taken out of their original context. I do know that there are plenty of reasonable people in this forum, but this thread is more of a question. A challenge, if you will, to those who flipped to the end of the book and read a paragraph or two of the last five pages. I think it would be good for those who are so angry to stop, examine their mentality, and wonder if it is really reasonable. Skepticism is a good quality to have.
Modifié par FlyingWalrus, 03 mars 2012 - 04:25 .