Aller au contenu

Photo

Dark Energy - Do we ever learn more about it? Mentioned in ME2.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
81 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Tom Lehrer

Tom Lehrer
  • Members
  • 1 589 messages

jellobell wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

It's more so that galactic extinction in a permanent basis with the removal of all resources on planets doesn't happen.

Which is stupid. There are 200-400 billion stars in the Milky Way. There are in turn hundreds of billions of Galaxies in the Universe, with more being created all the time as it expands. There is no way that organics would be able to use up a all of these resources before the heat death of the Universe. It's a non-issue.


Sorry but that is wrong. There are many many galaxies but new ones are NOT being made all the time. One of the basic laws of the universe is that new matter and energy cannot be made. It is possiable to ture matter into energy and in theory energy into matter. As the universe expandes the energy and mater in it get pulled apart and according to at least on theory it will cause all matter to rip itself apart at some point.

What is causing the universe to expand though? Dark energy.

#77
blooregard

blooregard
  • Members
  • 1 151 messages
wouldn't the "Dark energy" story have been a western version of gurren lagann?

#78
Allworkandlowpay

Allworkandlowpay
  • Members
  • 94 messages
I still don't see how the dark energy ending was foreshadowed more than the dangerous of the singularity. The only reference to dark energy at all was the issue with haelstrom, where we had countless subtext to rogue A.I, past and present, as well as the scorched planets and depleted resources from a war with a race of sentient machines. The same machines who were a major threat to the galaxy in ME1.

#79
corporal doody

corporal doody
  • Members
  • 6 037 messages

Unit-Alpha wrote...

This was supposed to be how to get a decent ending.

They cut it.



maybe taken out so it can rehashed and tweaked? dlc type material?

#80
Tom Lehrer

Tom Lehrer
  • Members
  • 1 589 messages

blooregard wrote...

wouldn't the "Dark energy" story have been a western version of gurren lagann?


Whats gurren lagann?

Dark energy is a force in the universe that is cauaing it expand dispite the pull of gravity.

#81
Allworkandlowpay

Allworkandlowpay
  • Members
  • 94 messages

Tom Lehrer wrote...

blooregard wrote...

wouldn't the "Dark energy" story have been a western version of gurren lagann?


Whats gurren lagann?

Dark energy is a force in the universe that is cauaing it expand dispite the pull of gravity.


Or, if you are critical of the current view of relativity, is astro-physicists' "fudge factor."

Modifié par Allworkandlowpay, 05 mars 2012 - 05:46 .


#82
The Apostate

The Apostate
  • Members
  • 25 messages
I think the dark energy story would have fitted a little bit more than the technological singularity as the motivation for the Reapers. However, why can't we have both to explain the Reaper's motivation? I see no contradiction if the Reapers have both (if you can find one, please let me know). I just find it difficult to believe that Bioware would just drop the dark energy plot as a red herring without any resolution whatsoever. If they do, then the video game critics have no idea what the phrase "no loose ends" means (the sad thing is, they probably don't).