Aller au contenu

Photo

I feel Merge/Synergy is the only real option.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
317 réponses à ce sujet

#151
Aesieru

Aesieru
  • Members
  • 4 201 messages

Bentebent wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

Why are you acting like a juvenile with your juvenile comments? Seriously what intellectual capacity does the statement "herpa derp" infer other than that you are an idiot?

If you have a means of beyond FTL already and it works, you will see no reason to go past it and you fall into that trap.


But they don't have the means to go beyond the relays so your point is moot.


I didn't say beyond the relays, I said beyond FTL (which is not the relays).

#152
Aesieru

Aesieru
  • Members
  • 4 201 messages

Bentebent wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

Why are you acting like a juvenile with your juvenile comments? Seriously what intellectual capacity does the statement "herpa derp" infer other than that you are an idiot?

If you have a means of beyond FTL already and it works, you will see no reason to go past it and you fall into that trap.


But they don't have the means to go beyond the relays so your point is moot.


FTL is not the relays, that's BEYOND FTL.

#153
Bentebent

Bentebent
  • Members
  • 69 messages

Aesieru wrote...

FTL is not the relays, that's BEYOND FTL.


Ok? The argument was about rebuilding the relays, which you said would be "imprisonment" due to causing the galaxy not to research new technolgy (no "need"). But as I just said, the need to go beyond the relays is there.

You. are. wrong.

#154
Nathan Redgrave

Nathan Redgrave
  • Members
  • 2 062 messages
FTL stands for "faster than light" and any ship with an eezo drive can pull it off. Mass Relays create "corridors" of almost mass-free space, essentially raising the speed of light to the point where going from one end of the galaxy to the other takes practically no time at all. FTL, on the other hand, would still take months or years to achieve the same, depending on exactly how much faster than light you're going.

#155
AkiKishi

AkiKishi
  • Members
  • 10 898 messages

Eclipse_9990 wrote...

Imperium Alpha wrote...

The relationship is symbiotic, organic and machine intertwined, a union of flesh and steel, the strengths of both, the weaknesses of neither! I am a vision of the future Shepard, the evolution of all organic life!


Saren was right. (again he was right about everyone you know and love dying too) :lol:


Image IPB


If only we had listened we never would have had to see that T-800.

Modifié par BobSmith101, 03 mars 2012 - 06:31 .


#156
Nathan Redgrave

Nathan Redgrave
  • Members
  • 2 062 messages

Bentebent wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

FTL is not the relays, that's BEYOND FTL.


Ok? The argument was about rebuilding the relays, which you said would be "imprisonment" due to causing the galaxy not to research new technolgy (no "need"). But as I just said, the need to go beyond the relays is there.

You. are. wrong.


I would argue that what kept galactic civilization from progressing wasn't the relays, but their dependence on the already-existing Relays. The Protheans and that one asari barmistress had the right idea; try to make your own Mass Relays. Once you get to the point where you can replicate the technology yourselves, you can then move beyond them and advance to a new level.

#157
Eclipse_9990

Eclipse_9990
  • Members
  • 3 116 messages

BobSmith101 wrote...

Eclipse_9990 wrote...

Imperium Alpha wrote...

The relationship is symbiotic, organic and machine intertwined, a union of flesh and steel, the strengths of both, the weaknesses of neither! I am a vision of the future Shepard, the evolution of all organic life!


Saren was right. (again he was right about everyone you know and love dying too) :lol:


[Snip]


If only we had listed we never would have had to see that T-800.


We didn't listen! 

Modifié par Eclipse_9990, 03 mars 2012 - 06:35 .


#158
Bentebent

Bentebent
  • Members
  • 69 messages

Nathan Redgrave wrote...


I would argue that what kept galactic civilization from progressing wasn't the relays, but their dependence on the already-existing Relays. The Protheans and that one asari barmistress had the right idea; try to make your own Mass Relays. Once you get to the point where you can replicate the technology yourselves, you can then move beyond them and advance to a new level.


Of course, that was after all pretty much the idea  since presumably a single cycle is too short to be able to replicate a relay (well, except for the Protehans). Your examples just shows that there have been attempts to understand and replicate technology even though there apparently is no "need" for it.

#159
Aesieru

Aesieru
  • Members
  • 4 201 messages
arguing in this thread and most other threads in here is just a waste of my time, literally I see time moving by me.

#160
royard

royard
  • Members
  • 339 messages

Aesieru wrote...

Bentebent wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

Unless a reason to try exists, you will not go outside the current means. History has proven this time and again.


Indeed, never ever has there been anyone thinking outside of the box.

Ever.


Unless a REASON TO exists, no there has never been such a thing.

Go open up a history book.


Right, because Shepard, who has more military might than ALL the races combined in control ending, cannot force everyone to develop new tech. 

#161
Bentebent

Bentebent
  • Members
  • 69 messages

Aesieru wrote...

arguing in this thread and most other threads in here is just a waste of my time, literally I see time moving by me.


Weak.

Also, has there been any info on why the Reapers just don't shut down the relay network as was intended in ME1? Shouldn't be anything stopping them, considering they can just teleport the Citadel to Sol, with magic.

#162
AkiKishi

AkiKishi
  • Members
  • 10 898 messages

royard wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

Bentebent wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

Unless a reason to try exists, you will not go outside the current means. History has proven this time and again.


Indeed, never ever has there been anyone thinking outside of the box.

Ever.


Unless a REASON TO exists, no there has never been such a thing.

Go open up a history book.


Right, because Shepard, who has more military might than ALL the races combined in control ending, cannot force everyone to develop new tech. 



That's so FFX Shepard will just become the new "Sin".

#163
Aesieru

Aesieru
  • Members
  • 4 201 messages

Bentebent wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

arguing in this thread and most other threads in here is just a waste of my time, literally I see time moving by me.


Weak.

Also, has there been any info on why the Reapers just don't shut down the relay network as was intended in ME1? Shouldn't be anything stopping them, considering they can just teleport the Citadel to Sol, with magic.


You are assuming far too much without context, it wasn't magic, maybe it traveled through the damn relay for all you know.

--- He doesn't actually control it!

Modifié par Aesieru, 03 mars 2012 - 06:49 .


#164
Eclipse_9990

Eclipse_9990
  • Members
  • 3 116 messages

BobSmith101 wrote...

royard wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

Bentebent wrote...

Aesieru wrote...

Unless a reason to try exists, you will not go outside the current means. History has proven this time and again.


Indeed, never ever has there been anyone thinking outside of the box.

Ever.


Unless a REASON TO exists, no there has never been such a thing.

Go open up a history book.


Right, because Shepard, who has more military might than ALL the races combined in control ending, cannot force everyone to develop new tech. 



That's so FFX Shepard will just become the new "Sin".


Haha! Holy **** you're right! First DeusEX:HR, and now Final Fantasy X!? God damn Bioware! :lol:

#165
royard

royard
  • Members
  • 339 messages

BobSmith101 wrote...

royard wrote...

Right, because Shepard, who has more military might than ALL the races combined in control ending, cannot force everyone to develop new tech. 



That's so FFX Shepard will just become the new "Sin".


Because using military THREAT to force people to do things they kinda don't want to never happens in real life? 

[EDIT]

Oh, my bad, I didn't get your reference. 

Modifié par royard, 03 mars 2012 - 06:52 .


#166
Zyrious

Zyrious
  • Members
  • 358 messages
I wish people would stop acting like "Destroy" Renders space travel non-existent. It doesn't. FTL still exists, space ships still exist, only all AI (including the reapers and relays as a result of the process) is destroyed. That's it. Earth will maintain contact with it's colonies. It takes 27 years with FTL to cross the galaxy, which is 100,000 lightyears in diameter. Most of Earth's colonies are much closer than that, and in the meantime those colonies can main tain trade with nearby worlds.

Destroy removes the relays, yes, but the main theme of Mass Effect has also been that reliance on the relays is what has been the downfall of every prior civilization. Now civilizations must adapt and "Find another way". They will survive. And in Destroy, they will find a way to survive WITHOUT having a MASSIVE change FORCED upon them. I am honestly surprised at how many people would willingly justify forcing Synergy on TRILLIONS, when billions have died in many wars to maintain ones own individuality, individual cultures and religions and ideologies, and many trillions more would rather die than suffer such a fate. Who are you to decide wether synergy is a better life for them?

#167
Bentebent

Bentebent
  • Members
  • 69 messages

Aesieru wrote...


You are assuming far too much without context, it wasn't magic, maybe it traveled through the damn relay for all you know.

--- He doesn't actually control it!


A relay going through a relay?

Yeah, I'd rather go with magic.

#168
royard

royard
  • Members
  • 339 messages

Zyrious wrote...

Destroy removes the relays, yes, but the main theme of Mass Effect has also been that reliance on the relays is what has been the downfall of every prior civilization.


Right, they totally failed due to their own error, because there were never any ridiculously powerful aliens slaughtering them at all. 

#169
Zyrious

Zyrious
  • Members
  • 358 messages

royard wrote...

Zyrious wrote...

Destroy removes the relays, yes, but the main theme of Mass Effect has also been that reliance on the relays is what has been the downfall of every prior civilization.


Right, they totally failed due to their own error, because there were never any ridiculously powerful aliens slaughtering them at all. 


Again, it has been said across all 3 games that the relays were used so that all the races would develope along the technological path set forth by said powerful aliens so that people couldn't overpower the reapers with unique and possibly superior tech, because they become reliant on "Hand me down" technology, as it were. Destroying that forces every species to begin developing along their own path. Necessity is the key to invention. Reapers removed a lot of necessity.

Modifié par Zyrious, 03 mars 2012 - 06:57 .


#170
Bentebent

Bentebent
  • Members
  • 69 messages

Zyrious wrote...

I wish people would stop acting like "Destroy" Renders space travel non-existent. It doesn't. FTL still exists, space ships still exist, only all AI (including the reapers and relays as a result of the process) is destroyed. That's it. Earth will maintain contact with it's colonies. It takes 27 years with FTL to cross the galaxy, which is 100,000 lightyears in diameter. Most of Earth's colonies are much closer than that, and in the meantime those colonies can main tain trade with nearby worlds.

Destroy removes the relays, yes, but the main theme of Mass Effect has also been that reliance on the relays is what has been the downfall of every prior civilization. Now civilizations must adapt and "Find another way". They will survive. And in Destroy, they will find a way to survive WITHOUT having a MASSIVE change FORCED upon them. I am honestly surprised at how many people would willingly justify forcing Synergy on TRILLIONS, when billions have died in many wars to maintain ones own individuality, individual cultures and religions and ideologies, and many trillions more would rather die than suffer such a fate. Who are you to decide wether synergy is a better life for them?


27 years, that's a 54 year long roundtrip. Sounds awesome, really.

The main theme has not been how the relays themselves have been the source of the downfall but rather how the reapers lead development of space faring civilizations to in the end gut them in an elaborate trap. Who are you to decide which route evolution takes?

#171
Zyrious

Zyrious
  • Members
  • 358 messages

Bentebent wrote...

Zyrious wrote...

I wish people would stop acting like "Destroy" Renders space travel non-existent. It doesn't. FTL still exists, space ships still exist, only all AI (including the reapers and relays as a result of the process) is destroyed. That's it. Earth will maintain contact with it's colonies. It takes 27 years with FTL to cross the galaxy, which is 100,000 lightyears in diameter. Most of Earth's colonies are much closer than that, and in the meantime those colonies can main tain trade with nearby worlds.

Destroy removes the relays, yes, but the main theme of Mass Effect has also been that reliance on the relays is what has been the downfall of every prior civilization. Now civilizations must adapt and "Find another way". They will survive. And in Destroy, they will find a way to survive WITHOUT having a MASSIVE change FORCED upon them. I am honestly surprised at how many people would willingly justify forcing Synergy on TRILLIONS, when billions have died in many wars to maintain ones own individuality, individual cultures and religions and ideologies, and many trillions more would rather die than suffer such a fate. Who are you to decide wether synergy is a better life for them?


27 years, that's a 54 year long roundtrip. Sounds awesome, really.

The main theme has not been how the relays themselves have been the source of the downfall but rather how the reapers lead development of space faring civilizations to in the end gut them in an elaborate trap. Who are you to decide which route evolution takes?


If you use merge YOU are forcing a form of evolution on everyone. If you choose Control, as stated by xio, you are maintaining the Cycle, but delaying it. You can't just fly the reapers into the sun, you are still constrained by the protocols of the citadel. In Destroy, you remove the relays, maintain everyone's freedom and identity, and are allowing everyone to develope along their own technological path's. Thus, allowing more natural evolution of culture and tech, rather than the guided form by the reapers.

#172
royard

royard
  • Members
  • 339 messages

Zyrious wrote...

royard wrote...

Zyrious wrote...

Destroy removes the relays, yes, but the main theme of Mass Effect has also been that reliance on the relays is what has been the downfall of every prior civilization.


Right, they totally failed due to their own error, because there were never any ridiculously powerful aliens slaughtering them at all. 


Again, it has been said across all 3 games that the relays were used so that all the races would develope along the technological path set forth by said powerful aliens so that people couldn't overpower the reapers with unique and possibly superior tech, because they become reliant on "Hand me down" technology, as it were. Destroying that forces every species to begin developing along their own path. Necessity is the key to invention. Reapers removed a lot of necessity.


Because you like reinventing the wheel?  Seriously, necessity will arise in the future and people will invent new things. 

Even if you destroy, which one is the easier path?  Rebuilding the relay will be easier since there are so many reaper bodies lying around. 

#173
Zyrious

Zyrious
  • Members
  • 358 messages

royard wrote...

Zyrious wrote...

royard wrote...

Zyrious wrote...

Destroy removes the relays, yes, but the main theme of Mass Effect has also been that reliance on the relays is what has been the downfall of every prior civilization.


Right, they totally failed due to their own error, because there were never any ridiculously powerful aliens slaughtering them at all. 


Again, it has been said across all 3 games that the relays were used so that all the races would develope along the technological path set forth by said powerful aliens so that people couldn't overpower the reapers with unique and possibly superior tech, because they become reliant on "Hand me down" technology, as it were. Destroying that forces every species to begin developing along their own path. Necessity is the key to invention. Reapers removed a lot of necessity.


Because you like reinventing the wheel?  Seriously, necessity will arise in the future and people will invent new things. 

Even if you destroy, which one is the easier path?  Rebuilding the relay will be easier since there are so many reaper bodies lying around. 


In order to rebuild the relays they have to understand how they work, even that is a better option. Relying on tech they don't understand, they can never reach their full potential or the full potential of the technology. When they learn how it works they'll not only be able to add their own spin to it, but they can spread amongst the galaxy as they see fit, rather than the pre-defined cage of the reapers. Either way, humanity and the rest of the galaxy gains a new insight into how it all works, and thus more control over it. And it's better than maintaining the cycle or forcing synergy on an unsuspecting galaxy.

#174
Bentebent

Bentebent
  • Members
  • 69 messages

Zyrious wrote...

If you use merge YOU are forcing a form of evolution on everyone. If you choose Control, as stated by xio, you are maintaining the Cycle, but delaying it. You can't just fly the reapers into the sun, you are still constrained by the protocols of the citadel. In Destroy, you remove the relays, maintain everyone's freedom and identity, and are allowing everyone to develope along their own technological path's. Thus, allowing more natural evolution of culture and tech, rather than the guided form by the reapers.

An evolution, which according to the cycle, is the natural way to go as it apparently always happens.

Why can't you fly them into the sun? The Guardian explicitly says "I control the Reapers", unless you can show anything that contradicts this, you're just flat out wrong.

Considering how dependant most planets are upon intergalactic trade, I wouldn't be surprised if most planets went to **** fast, real fast. Earth especially.

#175
Canned Bullets

Canned Bullets
  • Members
  • 1 553 messages

Nathan Redgrave wrote...

Joescrab wrote...

Ruins the purpose of being "human" per se though... What's the point of living then?


It only ruins the purpose if it removes their capacity for individuality and free will, but in this scenario what's happening is that all organics are becoming partially synthetic... and all synthetics are becoming partially organic. Yes, that includes the Reapers, apparently.


So do Humans keep their personality after getting cybernetic implants?