Zyrious wrote...
I dont think tech singularity is inevitable. Infact part of the Geth-Quarian plotline, depending how you handle it, proves that, and even catches gaurdian off gaurd. If you choose destroy, you do so because you refuse to give in to the fear that gaurdians creators did, and that you don't believe it is inevitable. And/or at the end of the day the galaxy has a right to shape its own destiny, rather than have one thrust upon them in Merge or Control.
It has the right, but I personally think it's doomed to failure. In the grand scheme of things at some point, somewhere, AI will get the upper hand. I do think the Guardian is a bit naive (or it's programming is) to assume every single mega AI is going to cause problems for organics. Then again the Geth are unique in that they're limited by proximity when it comes to their intelligence. For all we know after they build their dyson sphere and group all their programs together, they could become a runaway intelligence. Regardless, they do seem quite content keeping to themselves. What happens when they keep ever expanding programs and possibly build other dyson spheres throughout the galaxy. Would there be enough left for organics especially if they organics caused hostilities much like the Quarians?
Aesieru wrote...
It's not really a runaway intelligence so much as something that merely can see no reason for organics anymore.
True and that's exactly what the Guardian focuses on. However if that doesn't cause the downfall of organics (genocidal Borg/Cylons), a runaway intelligence would almost certainly cause problems unless it's path of perfection, self discovery and ever improving intelligence didn't require unsustainable amounts of resources. An AI doesn't need to decide that organics must be exterminated, but only needs to not care one way or another. The same way an ant colony doesn't keep us from putting a shovel in the ground or building a new house.