Aller au contenu

Photo

Two Things I Never Figured Out


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
33 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Last Darkness

Last Darkness
  • Members
  • 2 794 messages

MelodicMizery-vpt wrote...

gsmithcat wrote...

Just started my second character, and I realized that there a couple of things I never figured out with my first character.  I would appreciate any knowledge anyone has to share.

1. Landmarks.  Everywhere I went, I found landmarks (tree landmarks, boat landmarks, etc...).  I could click on them, but they didn't do anything.  I always figured they would come up in a later quest, but they never did.  Did I miss something?

2. The equipement box for your army.  I threw some runes, gold, elf roots, and a gem or two into that box, but I have no idea if it made any difference.  Does it affect the size of your army at the end.  I had 50 humans, 50 dwarves, 50 elves, and 12 mages.  Which seemed wrong considering I threw in way more runes than anything else.


this does effect how many soldiers of each group  you have that u can request in final battle, it looks like you can get up to 50 people in each group the more you donate the more you get up to 50


And

RI-Corky wrote...

You can also use the equipment chests to
level up your character post game completion to max your character
prior to importing into Awakening ( if you finished the game at level 22
for example, you can level up to 25 prior to importing)


You two do realise this question was asked over a year ago, thats 365 days. Your quite late to join the conversation and are spaming the thread by ressurecting already answered and forgotten discussions.

Please refrain from doing this in the future and keep.  Post Reported.

#27
PatT2

PatT2
  • Members
  • 859 messages
@Last Darkness: you realize, of course, that some folks are just buying the game now after buying DA2, right? And instead of starting a new thread, they do as they are always told--search for an old one. But then they want to comment and it becomes thread necro.

What's it to you? Or anyone?

#28
JayDea

JayDea
  • Members
  • 61 messages
A one year old thread still active is not the same as a one year old thread untouched for a year. How often do you reply a year later to conversations with your family or friends?
The other way around: do you wait a year for answers to questions posted on a forum?
The OP already had been answered, and the late reply digging this thread out didn't add anything new to the topic.

#29
BlazingSpeed

BlazingSpeed
  • Members
  • 371 messages
Hm, nothing about the (Redcliff...) troops equipment upgrades through donations (Warden's/enemy level scaling...).

To bad I've been wondering about that since I first rented the PS3 version two years ago...

#30
PatT2

PatT2
  • Members
  • 859 messages
If thread necro-ing is all you have to worry about, I guess I'll trade you worries. I don't think it's such a big deal.

As far as I can tell, adding to the boxes in camp via donations does NOTHING except add to your exp. Period. I've tried both ways. I always get 50/50/50/12 (Dwarves/Redcliffe/Elves/Mages) I'm sure the other numbers, ie for golems and werewolves are also the same, though I've never been able to bring myself to side with those factions.

Try it both ways for yourself. Donate and don't donate. The people who say it makes a difference must have a different game than I do.

And yes, sometimes I do go back and answer a conversation with my family a year lter, but then again, a year isn't such a long time so someone as aged as myself. High school was 2/3 of my life ago.

#31
Last Darkness

Last Darkness
  • Members
  • 2 794 messages
Might want to read and extrapolate upon the definition.
Here
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/thread_necromancy
Here
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ThreadNecromancer
And

"Necroposting" (also called "necrobumping" or "gravedigging"), occurs
when a forum thread that has been inactive for a long time, typically
years, is bumped by a reader, usually in response to what he
inadvertently believes to be an ongoing discussion, perhaps coming from a
web search rather than from within the forum.


The conversation is dead, the topic is already answered and no further information is needed. Anything more is going off-topic and is against the rules and you should just open a new thread for it.
Its considered a form of spaming which is against the rules and also it is not suggested to dredge up old topics.
You can read the forum rules here.
social.bioware.com/page/site-rules

Modifié par Last Darkness, 03 septembre 2011 - 01:50 .


#32
PatT2

PatT2
  • Members
  • 859 messages
Well consider me chastened. I was only try to stick up for a potential newbie, which most 'oldies" tend to be pretty hard on. I know the meaning. I will no longer attempt to stick up for people getting slammed by long-timers who already know everything. Maybe we need a new forum just for new folks who don't get flamed for making mistakes.

#33
PatT2

PatT2
  • Members
  • 859 messages
I wasn't the necro'er. Don't flame me. I was just sticking up for a possible newbie. Good deeds never go unpunished. I was aware of the rules and of the meaning. Direct your anger elsewhere. Like at some monster. Kill a dragon or something, k?

#34
Last Darkness

Last Darkness
  • Members
  • 2 794 messages

PatT2 wrote...

Well consider me chastened. I was only try to stick up for a potential newbie, which most 'oldies" tend to be pretty hard on. I know the meaning. I will no longer attempt to stick up for people getting slammed by long-timers who already know everything. Maybe we need a new forum just for new folks who don't get flamed for making mistakes.

I wasn't the necro'er. Don't flame me. I was just sticking up for a
possible newbie. Good deeds never go unpunished. I was aware of the
rules and of the meaning. Direct your anger elsewhere. Like at some
monster. Kill a dragon or something, k


Theres nothing wrong with that and in most situations its quite proper forum etiquette.
You just need to pick when, where and how you choose to exercise that behavior better.

In this situation you were defending someone in the wrong and without proper information reguarding the matter.
In others that may significantly change, and be more appropiete.

Modifié par Last Darkness, 04 septembre 2011 - 02:31 .