marshalleck wrote...
mybudgee wrote...
I was kind of on the fence about it in ME2. Now that I have upgraded it, its ok. Better with the Mattock, though...
Mattock is also bad. Use Avenger if you absolutely must use AR
From what it looks like the Avenger is good against Cerberus troops and other enemies you can get by with headshots with. The Revenant is better for taking out stuff that you can't headshot to death (like atlas mechs or turrets) or other types of enemies that like to get close (like husks for example).NOO3TASTIC wrote...
Atmosfear3 wrote...
I really don't understand all the people that praise the Revenant for its "suppressive" ability. First of all, enemies take cover regardless. Even if such a suppressive state exists for the enemy AI, why would you want them to take cover all the time in the first place? I'd rather they openly charge me so I can mow them down with more efficiency.
Secondly, theres no "aggro" mechanic. Enemies will shoot whoever is closest or out of cover first. You can hide behind cover all day with the Rev and nobody will shoot you any more or less than your buddy next to you thats constantly popping out of cover to shoot.
Agreed. Keeping two three soldiers busy in low damage suppressive fire is pointless when you can kill double the numbers in same time with a different weapon.
Widow 1 as well as Claymore 1 are better than X version of their counter parts but revenant isn't
that good compared to Avenger X. Here are two videos Avenger X and Revenant IV with Stability Upgrade V and Clip SIze V mods.
Avenger
www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0_kpzJNbpM
Revenant
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zugAcv81VvQ
With Clip Size V mod 54 Accurate Bullets of Avenger are better than 100+ inaccurate bullets. Both videos were without Asault Rifle Damage and AP or other Ammor and were made on silver difficulty.
Urazz wrote...
From what it looks like the Avenger is good against Cerberus troops and other enemies you can get by with headshots with. The Revenant is better for taking out stuff that you can't headshot to death (like atlas mechs or turrets) or other types of enemies that like to get close (like husks for example).
NOO3TASTIC wrote...
Urazz wrote...
From what it looks like the Avenger is good against Cerberus troops and other enemies you can get by with headshots with. The Revenant is better for taking out stuff that you can't headshot to death (like atlas mechs or turrets) or other types of enemies that like to get close (like husks for example).
Yes Avenger with high level mods can score a lot more headshots at medium to long range compared to revenant. But for dealing enemies that get close by an assault rifle with a very large clip size isn't a good option. You have Shotguns for that. Turrets, Guaridans and Atlas can be taken out with AP Ammo on Avenger quite easily. With AP Ammo II and Assault Rifle Damage Boost II I can take out three guardians in single clip (54 bullets with Clip Size V).
If revenant get it's bullet spread reduced and damage increased only then it will be a viable Assault Rifle. Right now it has medicore performance and has a lot of weight that increase cooldowns a lot.
az350z wrote...
IMO, this is what it should be.
I-want-this-right-now whiners can say what they want, having items like Revenant X far out of reach is a great thing. Keeps things fresh and gives you a ton of room for acquiring better goods, whether you agree or not.
Makes everything that much more unique.
Retour en haut