Saphra Deden wrote...
Well seeing as an army of security mechs, dozens of armed security officers, and various levels of clearance to restrict access apparently doesn't meet your standards for "basic" security, then I'm curious as to what does.
An army of security mechs turned on their owners, armed security officers that couldn't stop them, and levels of clearance that are of little value against either hacking efforts or plain old firepower? Considering the value placed in Shepard, this never should have happened. Period.
I won't bother going into other Ceberus debacles, where the corpses you find aren't even wearing hardsuits.
No, they didn't. They analyzed it and determined to the best of their ability that there was no threat. They didn't just look at the dead Reaper and say "there is no threat". Instead they studied it to see that it had no activity even on a microscopic level and then moved in to get to work.
There's always going to be risk, but it is only reckless if you don't take reasonable precautions.
And there wasn't a plan in place in case maybe, just maybe Reaper artifacts ended up doing what they have done at nearly every available opportunity? No off-Reaper personnel or system watching for this? Nothing? It was a rush job with the disregard for life wholly characteristic of Cerberus.
THAT IS NOT A PLAN.
TELL ME WHAT YOU WOULD DO.
No, it's not a plan. My issue with Cerberus and its experiments (morality aside) is that they fail over and over and
over again, and often for the
exact same reasons. Whether they feel these experiments are vital to the security of the human race (and that's debatable) is not really the point -- the fact that they continue to approach the problems from the same angles
is.
When you encounter a brick wall, there is no way to skirt around it, and your first plan of slamming your head into it yields nothing but some blood and a headache, your second plan probably shouldn't be hitting your head against it another time.
I'm still waiting to hear why you're so pro-Cerberus.