Varenus Luckmann wrote...
And for that we have only Morrigan's word.
Maybe this is naive of me, but Morrigan never came across as evil to me. Her mother, either (well, until I found out about the body swapping thing). Different - yeah, pragmatic - absolutely, self-serving - definitely, but Morrigan especially never struck me as evil. A stone hearted b!tch at times, certainly, but not evil. I'm a stone hearted b!tch at times. But anyway...
Alot of what we knew about the Witch of the Wilds was superstition and legend, they were apostates, evil in the eyes of the Chantry and the Templars. Flemeth and Morrigan helped the wardens twice, once preserving the treaties and returning them and secondly, saving them from the tower, which is more than the Chantry did. Technically, it was more than alot of people did. Hell, the Templars backed out on their promise to help you in the Tower (I know they do if the mages are wiped out, but still)
I, for one, think that some things, some traditions, some knowledge should be preserved (think of how advanced we would be if the library at Alexandria was not destroyed). The Chantry's efforts to wipe out unsanctioned magic is abhorrent to me, much more than Morrigan. Could that come back and bite me in the ****, absolutely - I'm not stupid. But I give her the benefit of the doubt. I felt she was owed that much.
I had no reason to think Morrigan was out to create some world-eating evil demon-child. She said she wanted to preserve something old and endangered, and I believed her.
Modifié par Wrathra, 10 décembre 2009 - 07:35 .