24 réponses à ce sujet

[WOLF_00]

 Check this site

Modifié par WOLF_00, 05 mars 2012 - 06:34 .

[Virginian]

What do you expect?

[SovereignWillReturn]

Funny story...it was removed by EA....

[What a Succulent Ass]

Is that the one that played Whitney Houston over the final scenes?

Because it improved them immensely. And at least partially drowned out the Guardian's nails-on-a-blackboard voice.

[IElitePredatorI]

I would of thought Bioware would of been the ones to remove it to be honest.

Modifié par IElitePredatorI, 05 mars 2012 - 06:39 .

[WOLF_00]

EA is acting in behalf of BioWare, this is far than anyone expected?!

[Eterna]

Maybe it's because of copyright and the person was not supposed to post it.

But nah, we'll just all rage and jump on the conspiracy theory boat.

[What a Succulent Ass]

EA is BioWare.

[Super.Sid]

So finally they have woken up and realized the situation but don't you think its too late ?

Modifié par Super.Sid, 05 mars 2012 - 06:38 .

[SichoPhiend]

Copyright infringement was the tool,
Protecting possible sales was the reason.

[Eterna]

SichoPhiend wrote...

Copyright infringement was the tool,
Protecting possible sales was the reason.

 Assumptions only make you look foolish. 

[WOLF_00]

EA realizes there is profit loss due to many people canceling their pre-order. So People won't stand on queue tomorrow for ME3 releases, which means find a new ending ASAP!

[Eterna]

WOLF_00 wrote...

EA realizes there is profit loss due to many people canceling their pre-order. So People won't stand on queue tomorrow for ME3 releases, which means find a new ending ASAP!

Assumptions only make you look foolish. 

[DXLelouch15]

which means DLC ending is imminent

[Super.Sid]

Its too late now. No new ending unless BW hid it or unless the game is further delayed

[MelfinaofOutlawStar]

They also removed a parody video involving Hepler. Apparently they copyright their employees.

[fivefingaslap18]

In my best Sir Alec Guinness impression: Which means EA has won. Then there would be no one who could stand against the Empire.

[SovereignWillReturn]

Super.Sid wrote...

So finally they have woken up and realized the situation but don't you think its too late ?

[veramis]

I like the lion king sound bit at the end, improved the game very much.

[WOLF_00]

fivefingaslap18 wrote...

In my best Sir Alec Guinness impression: Which means EA has won. Then there would be no one who could stand against the Empire.

I don't think EA is directly involved in any of BioWare activities, unless they get negative feedback from many customers, this is where BioWare find itself in vulnerable position against EA. 

[SilencedScream]

Eterna5 wrote...

SichoPhiend wrote...

Copyright infringement was the tool,
Protecting possible sales was the reason.

 Assumptions only make you look foolish. 

Actually, no - this is the real reason.
However, it's not because EA sees the hate for the endings; it's because it's a potentially game-ruining aspect for people. There are quite a few people who, if they know the ending, don't see the point in going through the rest of the motions.

So they took the video down to protect sales.

There's a lot that weighs in for marketing aspects; it's also why they won't bother taking down the same video in a year's time.

[BlackFriar]

IElitePredatorI wrote...

I would of thought Bioware would of been the ones to remove it to be honest.

EA is BioWare.   They are the same company -- EA/BioWare.    They insist on this all the time.   So stop thinking they're  not.   

[Eterna]

SilencedScream wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

SichoPhiend wrote...

Copyright infringement was the tool,
Protecting possible sales was the reason.

 Assumptions only make you look foolish. 

Actually, no - this is the real reason.
However, it's not because EA sees the hate for the endings; it's because it's a potentially game-ruining aspect for people. There are quite a few people who, if they know the ending, don't see the point in going through the rest of the motions.

So they took the video down to protect sales.

There's a lot that weighs in for marketing aspects; it's also why they won't bother taking down the same video in a year's time.

 In the context that this poster meant, yes it is just an assumption. 

[TheHitman]

Any mirror of it?

[Stanley Woo]

End of line.