232 réponses à ce sujet

[United_Strafes]

Nefario wrote...

Hey guys, you can get a bucket full of M&M's, or you can get a bucket half full of M&M's and get the rest of the bucket filled up with skittles! Isn't that great?

WHAT DO YOU MEAN I CAN'T FILL UP MY BUCKET WITH M&M'S I HATE SKITTLES AND I'M ANGRY

As I understand it, your galactic readiness is the percentage of your war assets that are effective. So, pulling out an arbitrary number, let's say your effective score needs to be 2000 in order to get the "best ending". In that case, you could get a total score of 4000 for total war assets, and if your galactic readiness is at 50%, you'll still get the best ending. On the other hand, if your galactic readiness was at 100% (boosted up from multiplayer or whatever else), you'd only need 2000 for your war assets to have the required effective assets.

Thanx maybe these people will shut up now. TRANSLATION: You do not require multiplayer, if you got a less than perfect ending it's because you played a less than perfect game and forgot something/didn't do things in time, I know that's hard to accept but it's a fact.

[martinf92]

Even if the 10000 assets goal was achievable, it would be INSANELY difficult. I played through the three games and made a fair amount of good choices in the third one and i still couldn't even get past the 7000 points milestone. The only way to get 5000 effective points is through the readiness percentage, which won't move from 50% unless you play multiplayer (which in reality isn't that bad and you should probably check it out); however whether the multiplayer is fun or the worst thing that ever happened is not the question here. I can assure you that by solely playing the SP you cannot obtain that many points... which [SPOILER AHEAD] doesn't matter since all the endings suck no matter what.

Modifié par martinf92, 09 mars 2012 - 01:18 .

[CitizenSnips]

It was stated in these forums by a mod that, bottom line, Multiplayer is not required to achieve the "best" ending. Can anyone refute this?

[Naugi]

GR is increased by playing the MP and means you need to find less War Assets in the SP campaign. You dont need to raise your GR, and therefore dont need to play MP, as you can find all the War Assets you need for the perfect ending in the SP alone. However if you do play the MP it raises your GR so you have less work to do in the SP.

So the OP is wrong, Galactic Readiness doesnt matter in the slightest, its an alternative means to getting the perfect ending as Bioware always intended it to be.

Cant believe people dont know this by now ...

[martinf92]

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

It was stated in these forums by a mod that, bottom line, Multiplayer is not required to achieve the "best" ending. Can anyone refute this?

Can anybody attest for it? Because so far i've seen no one saying they've reached 10000 points...

[martinf92]

Naugi wrote...

GR is increased by playing the MP and means you need to find less War Assets in the SP campaign. You dont need to raise your GR, and therefore dont need to play MP, as you can find all the War Assets you need for the perfect ending in the SP alone. However if you do play the MP it raises your GR so you have less work to do in the SP.

So the OP is wrong, Galactic Readiness doesnt matter in the slightest, its an alternative means to getting the perfect ending as Bioware always intended it to be.

Cant believe people dont know this by now ...

What you don't get is that if you do not raise your percentage of readines is virtually (if not completely) impossible to reach the 5000 effective points milestone. This of course due to the fact that your total is halved and getting 10000 points is, as previously mentioned, impossible.

[Flashlegend]

martinf92 wrote...

What you don't get is that if you do not raise your percentage of readines is virtually (if not completely) impossible to reach the 5000 effective points milestone. This of course due to the fact that your total is halved and getting 10000 points is, as previously mentioned, impossible.

5000 points? That's how much EMS you need? Wow

[martinf92]

On a separated note, even if it was possible to get 10000 points, why make it so difficult? they are punishing the players who don't wanna play multiplayer. I just can't see the point of it. I personally like it, but i don't want it to interfere so much with my SP.

[CitizenSnips]

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

It was stated in these forums by a mod that, bottom line, Multiplayer is not required to achieve the "best" ending. Can anyone refute this?

Can anybody attest for it? Because so far i've seen no one saying they've reached 10000 points...

But if the best ending doesn't require 10000 points, why does it matter?

[martinf92]

Flashlegend wrote...

martinf92 wrote...

What you don't get is that if you do not raise your percentage of readines is virtually (if not completely) impossible to reach the 5000 effective points milestone. This of course due to the fact that your total is halved and getting 10000 points is, as previously mentioned, impossible.

5000 points? That's how much EMS you need? Wow

According to random people and different guides on the web that's how much you need. Another milestone for the endings is 4000, and then comes 2800. I did pretty much everything without multiplayer and got 6820 points which translate to 3410 :\\

[Sebbe1337o]

I have a lot to go in the game, never played MP since I got it, and I have like 80% Galactic readiness.
OP is lying.

[martinf92]

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

It was stated in these forums by a mod that, bottom line, Multiplayer is not required to achieve the "best" ending. Can anyone refute this?

Can anybody attest for it? Because so far i've seen no one saying they've reached 10000 points...

But if the best ending doesn't require 10000 points, why does it matter?

It does if you don't play multiplayer. Remember for those who don't wanna play it their points get halved.

100% -> 10000 (The points you have)
50% -> 5000 (The points that actually matter if you didn't play multiplayer)

Again I'm not complaining, I'm just saying that you cannot get them by solely playing SP, or if you can, it's too freaking diffucult

[MPSai]

Sebbe1337o wrote...

I have a lot to go in the game, never played MP since I got it, and I have like 80% Galactic readiness.
OP is lying.

Have you played Infiltrator on the iPhone? Cause apparently that's another way to do it.

Modifié par MPSai, 09 mars 2012 - 01:55 .

[martinf92]

Sebbe1337o wrote...

I have a lot to go in the game, never played MP since I got it, and I have like 80% Galactic readiness.
OP is lying.

O.o mine didn't rise! :S

[Flashlegend]

Sebbe1337o wrote...

I have a lot to go in the game, never played MP since I got it, and I have like 80% Galactic readiness.
OP is lying.

What your saying isn't possible. If you never play MP, then your galactic readiness rating should never go above 50%

[CitizenSnips]

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

It was stated in these forums by a mod that, bottom line, Multiplayer is not required to achieve the "best" ending. Can anyone refute this?

Can anybody attest for it? Because so far i've seen no one saying they've reached 10000 points...

But if the best ending doesn't require 10000 points, why does it matter?

It does if you don't play multiplayer. Remember for those who don't wanna play it their points get halved.

100% -> 10000 (The points you have)
50% -> 5000 (The points that actually matter if you didn't play multiplayer)

Again I'm not complaining, I'm just saying that you cannot get them by solely playing SP, or if you can, it's too freaking diffucult

You didn't tell me why it actually mattered. If I can get the best ending by only playing single player, then why does Galactic Readiness matter?

[martinf92]

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

It was stated in these forums by a mod that, bottom line, Multiplayer is not required to achieve the "best" ending. Can anyone refute this?

Can anybody attest for it? Because so far i've seen no one saying they've reached 10000 points...

But if the best ending doesn't require 10000 points, why does it matter?

It does if you don't play multiplayer. Remember for those who don't wanna play it their points get halved.

100% -> 10000 (The points you have)
50% -> 5000 (The points that actually matter if you didn't play multiplayer)

Again I'm not complaining, I'm just saying that you cannot get them by solely playing SP, or if you can, it's too freaking diffucult

You didn't tell me why it actually mattered. If I can get the best ending by only playing single player, then why does Galactic Readiness matter?

That's the whole point you can't get it. Though to be honest the "best" ending really doesn't matter that much.

[Icinix]

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

It was stated in these forums by a mod that, bottom line, Multiplayer is not required to achieve the "best" ending. Can anyone refute this?

Can anybody attest for it? Because so far i've seen no one saying they've reached 10000 points...

But if the best ending doesn't require 10000 points, why does it matter?

It does if you don't play multiplayer. Remember for those who don't wanna play it their points get halved.

100% -> 10000 (The points you have)
50% -> 5000 (The points that actually matter if you didn't play multiplayer)

Again I'm not complaining, I'm just saying that you cannot get them by solely playing SP, or if you can, it's too freaking diffucult

You didn't tell me why it actually mattered. If I can get the best ending by only playing single player, then why does Galactic Readiness matter?

Arguably the vast majority of people who have completed the game have not come across a 'best ending' the fact you go into the ending with minimum or maximum seems to make no difference.

So its kind of a moot point anyway.

Unless of course you get 10,000 war assets and get your readiness up to 100% and we'll see if that gives us a different ending - but then they also said certain decisions had to be made to affect certain endings - so either no-one has done anything like this yet - or it doesn't exist. Once again. Moot point.

The fact of the matter here I think is - best ending = still crap ending. Thus - doing single player only still grants you the best ending. But impossible to get the highest score - which makes no difference to anything beyond pride.

[CitizenSnips]

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

martinf92 wrote...

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

It was stated in these forums by a mod that, bottom line, Multiplayer is not required to achieve the "best" ending. Can anyone refute this?

Can anybody attest for it? Because so far i've seen no one saying they've reached 10000 points...

But if the best ending doesn't require 10000 points, why does it matter?

It does if you don't play multiplayer. Remember for those who don't wanna play it their points get halved.

100% -> 10000 (The points you have)
50% -> 5000 (The points that actually matter if you didn't play multiplayer)

Again I'm not complaining, I'm just saying that you cannot get them by solely playing SP, or if you can, it's too freaking diffucult

You didn't tell me why it actually mattered. If I can get the best ending by only playing single player, then why does Galactic Readiness matter?

That's the whole point you can't get it. Though to be honest the "best" ending really doesn't matter that much.

So the sticky at the top of this forum is just a flat out lie. Or you're wrong.

[martinf92]

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

So the sticky at the top of this forum is just a flat out lie. Or you're wrong.

I hope I am, though again, after seeing that ending, i don't really care.

[Amikae]

I can 100% confirm, that reaching 8000TMS/4000EMS is impossible without playing in multiplayer. At best you could peak a little over 7000 TMS.

Another flat out lie, BioWare. But no one cares anymore, this is probably their last good game. EA ruined them. I never would have thought, that a day would come when I will have to play multiplayer in a BioWare RPG, to get the best out of it.

[laststarfighter]

I have, what might be a stupid question but does multiplayer and advancing to 100% galactic readiness without progressing the single player main plot cause you to lose sidequests?

[CitizenSnips]

Amikae wrote...

I can 100% confirm, that reaching 8000TMS/4000EMS is impossible without playing in multiplayer. At best you could peak a little over 7000 TMS.

Another flat out lie, BioWare. But no one cares anymore, this is probably their last good game. EA ruined them. I never would have thought, that a day would come when I will have to play multiplayer in a BioWare RPG, to get the best out of it.

Evidence? Any data? I'm not saying you are wrong but until I see data supporting this claim I'll be skeptical.

[loungeshep]

Amikae wrote...

I can 100% confirm, that reaching 8000TMS/4000EMS is impossible without playing in multiplayer. At best you could peak a little over 7000 TMS.

Another flat out lie, BioWare. But no one cares anymore, this is probably their last good game. EA ruined them. I never would have thought, that a day would come when I will have to play multiplayer in a BioWare RPG, to get the best out of it.

Also, the Easter Bunny....is a lie!

[Amikae]

mushoops86anjyl wrote...

Amikae wrote...

I can 100% confirm, that reaching 8000TMS/4000EMS is impossible without playing in multiplayer. At best you could peak a little over 7000 TMS.

Another flat out lie, BioWare. But no one cares anymore, this is probably their last good game. EA ruined them. I never would have thought, that a day would come when I will have to play multiplayer in a BioWare RPG, to get the best out of it.

Evidence? Any data? I'm not saying you are wrong but until I see data supporting this claim I'll be skeptical.

Be skeptical about the fact, that not a single soul on the internet has achieved this feat. I have almost a flawless playthrough of ME1-2 with ALL THE DLC + full paragon, convinced everyone in ME3 to my cause, scanned every planet, did every side quest and was still 1000 points behind.