Lucy_Glitter wrote...
Yuqi wrote...
Oh look it's the DA2 fiasco all over again..
Are you kidding?!
This is nothing like DA2 when it was released. This is about ten times worse than DA2's release.
Dave of Canada wrote...
If I wanted a shooter, I'd play the better shooters out there on the market. Lord knows we're drowning in them.
Modifié par fropas, 06 mars 2012 - 12:46 .
Jarrett Lee wrote...
It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.
fropas wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
If I wanted a shooter, I'd play the better shooters out there on the market. Lord knows we're drowning in them.
I just want to play an RPG shooter with a little bit of romance thrown in. . .are there any games that do that better than Mass Effect?
Wulfram wrote...
Acidrain92 wrote...
I dont think that the RPG elements are gone, in fact I think they are better than ever. What I think the issue is, is with the lack of choice and how no matter what the choices you made in the first two games, they all seem to come together to the same ending.
I think it has more to do with problems involving crafting your own story rather than the RPG elements. I know those two kind of co-incide, but when I think RPG im thinking more about power and weapon customization, currency, altering clothes and armor, relationship building and all that jazz.
It's awkward to discuss, because RPG in computer gaming has come to mean a specific thing which is rather divorced from what would otherwise be meant by "role playing"
From what I've heard, I think it could be said that ME3 is more of an RPG than previous games, yet contains less role-playing.
fropas wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
If I wanted a shooter, I'd play the better shooters out there on the market. Lord knows we're drowning in them.
I just want to play an RPG shooter with a little bit of romance thrown in. . .are there any games that do that better than Mass Effect?
Modifié par Janan Pacha, 06 mars 2012 - 12:50 .
fropas wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
If I wanted a shooter, I'd play the better shooters out there on the market. Lord knows we're drowning in them.
I just want to play an RPG shooter with a little bit of romance thrown in. . .are there any games that do that better than Mass Effect?
TheRealJayDee wrote...
Jarrett Lee wrote...
It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.
You're of course talking about the fact that you can't import the face of your ME->ME2 Shepard?
stoicsentry2 wrote...
fropas wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
If I wanted a shooter, I'd play the better shooters out there on the market. Lord knows we're drowning in them.
I just want to play an RPG shooter with a little bit of romance thrown in. . .are there any games that do that better than Mass Effect?
No - probably not.
Meaning, essentially, ME3 is good at 2 things: being a terrible shooter, and allowing you to be LGBT in space!
Modifié par fropas, 06 mars 2012 - 12:49 .
Acidrain92 wrote...
Wulfram wrote...
Acidrain92 wrote...
I dont think that the RPG elements are gone, in fact I think they are better than ever. What I think the issue is, is with the lack of choice and how no matter what the choices you made in the first two games, they all seem to come together to the same ending.
I think it has more to do with problems involving crafting your own story rather than the RPG elements. I know those two kind of co-incide, but when I think RPG im thinking more about power and weapon customization, currency, altering clothes and armor, relationship building and all that jazz.
It's awkward to discuss, because RPG in computer gaming has come to mean a specific thing which is rather divorced from what would otherwise be meant by "role playing"
From what I've heard, I think it could be said that ME3 is more of an RPG than previous games, yet contains less role-playing.
yeah I think thats a much better way to put it lol
either way I hope that this is a little exaggerated. I really want to get an overall..good ending I guess, and all of this talk about the endings and death and unavoidable circumstances is scaring me.
I hope all of our ME3 playthroughs wont be as similar as we all seem to believe.
Dave of Canada wrote...
You don't need to explain to me in full detail how you're the fan they're catering to.
Modifié par Guldhun2, 06 mars 2012 - 12:55 .
Elton John is dead wrote...
PDesign wrote...
boards.4chan.org/v/res/131729660
Seems like the 4chan lot got banned on here and were butthurt about it. Someone should tell them to cry some more because no one is listening. Who listens to metacritic reviews anyway?
MrAtomica wrote...
Jarrett Lee wrote...
It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.
You know what? You're absolutely right, Jarrett. It's utterly despicable.
I'll be the first to admit that I have some issues with the endings. I also am not a huge fan of the running animations, the low-res textures in some places, and the omni button. But from what I've played so far, and I make no claims to have gotten very far at all, this game is wonderful overall. I can forgive the aspects I have reservations over because it seems to me that you guys have put a lot of effort into tuning ME2 into something even better. It doesn't hurt that I have faith that you'll fill in any gaps that the fanbase raises a clamor over.
So bravo, and don't let the obvious trolls get you down. No game in the history of game development deserves a 0, let alone a couple hundred, especially right after release. Not even Superman 64 was that bad. I plan to put up a more critique oriented review once I've finished the game at least once. And I can promise you and the rest of the team that it will be as fair as humanly possible.
For anyone reading this, exercise common sense when putting a score on a product of someone else's hard
work. It's totally fine to score it however you feel is necessary, so long as you give sufficient reason for why you chose that score. The only way for a developer to improve their delivery of each new iteration is by collecting feedback from fans. That feedback can have concerns and nitpicks galore, just be polite when stating them.
Counter-rant is over now. I'm still blown away by how much petty hatred is flying around Metacritic at this point.
Edit:
I should mention, so that I don't get the word "****" thrown at me, that I DO have some fairly large complaints about the game (from spoilers, largely, which is why I skirted by them above). Make no mistake about this; I will certainly mention them at length in my review. But I cannot and will not condone such senseless raving. That is not an intelligent critique, that is a snap reflex caused by stewing anger from spoilers and leaked content. At least play the game in its entirety, first.
Modifié par Rob_K1, 06 mars 2012 - 12:54 .
Someone With Mass wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
You don't need to explain to me in full detail how you're the fan they're catering to.
Oh, and you have to explain how you're the fan they're not?
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 06 mars 2012 - 12:54 .
LPPrince wrote...
Honestly, all those percentages should be lower with the appearance import issue.
I can't see this game as being over an 80 until they fix this mess.
Guldhun2 wrote...
LPPrince wrote...
Honestly, all those percentages should be lower with the appearance import issue.
I can't see this game as being over an 80 until they fix this mess.
EA won't allow that.
Retour en haut
