557 réponses à ce sujet

[Ginkasa]

suprhomre wrote...

The game gets high score and you guys are complaining? Yez, you guys are truly fans of Mass Efffect, BioWare are truly lucky to have you.

I don't see anyone complaining.  For me, I was just curious how the reviewers stood on this face code issue and why it wasn't brought up.  I wasn't really expecting anything other than a high score.

[squee365]

neubourn wrote...

IGN ME2: 9.6
IGN ME3: 9.5

wat.

They changed thier reviewing system, don't worry, it makes sense. I think if they we're still in their old system it'd be a 9.7 or so.

[UrPhreshness]

Ginkasa wrote...

UrPhreshness wrote...

Ginkasa wrote...

Didn't mention it. I wonder if they didn't import at all (I know the "review in progress" mentioned he was playing predominantly in a "fresh" game without an import) or if he always used the default Shepard or if he somehow didn't have issues.

Well the video review shows Xbox gameplay and he said he was saving the import for xbox. But I can't lie i'm pretty ignorant to this issue if you played ME2 and imported ur ME1 face in there why is importing from 1 to 3 a problem?

The issue, I guess, is that an ME2 face that had been imported from ME1 will not import properly into ME3.  I don't know the technicals behind it and Best Buy decided midnight releases were for loser, so I can't really see how mine works until tomorrow.

Well sounds like a non-issue for me plus i don't mind taking 10 minutes to customize it again.

[Darthsam]

Destructoid gave it 8.5

[DJBare]

10/10?, that's a score for innovation, I guess I'll soon see for myself.

[squee365]

Jarrett Lee wrote...

AmstradHero wrote...

PDesign wrote...

metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3 user score

I guess trolls have nothing better to do with their time.

It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.

I wouldn't worry about it! Same thing happened to portal 2. If the game is genuinely good (which is clearly is having played 3 hours and already wow'd), then it'll even itself out.

[AlexXIV]

Jarrett Lee wrote...

AmstradHero wrote...

PDesign wrote...

metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3 user score

I guess trolls have nothing better to do with their time.

It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.

Damaging for Metacritic. Seriously, how can anyone take this serious? Because 11 or such losers give a 0 to even prevent a good score for a game that millions love/enjoy? If this harms ME3 then you people should honestly consider sueing them because that's just awful. The only one who deserves a 0/10 is Metacritic tbh.

Modifié par AlexXIV, 06 mars 2012 - 08:23 .

[AkiKishi]

Game Informer was the one that said DA2 had auto attack when it turned out to be not the case.

Destructoid,Giant Bomb seem more on the mark.

[squee365]

AlexXIV wrote...

Jarrett Lee wrote...

AmstradHero wrote...

PDesign wrote...

metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3 user score

I guess trolls have nothing better to do with their time.

It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.

Damaging for Metacritic. Seriously, how can anyone take this serious? Because 11 or such losers give a 0 to even prevent a good score for a game that millions love/enjoy? If this harms ME3 then you people should honestly consider sueing them because that's just awful. The only one who deserves a 0/10 is Metacritic tbh.

Gamestats is superior in every way. 
And its been around longer.

Modifié par squee365, 06 mars 2012 - 08:24 .

[fropas]

Zarradan wrote...

Destructoid 8.5

Reviewer is the same guy who gave Dark Souls a 7 so I think we can take that review with a pinch of salt...

Hey, anything above an 8 means it's a good game in my opinion . But I have lower standards, than most, when it comes to games.

[JaHawk]

Dtoid - 8.5/10
http://www.destructo...-3-223213.phtml

[Cjail]

No review was made on PS3 so no way to tell if the frame-rate problems encountered in demo are still there.

[DJBare]

www.metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3
And in obvious retaliation, someone gives it a 10, I cannot take metacritic seriously anymore.

[Catsith]

Jarrett Lee wrote...

AmstradHero wrote...

PDesign wrote...

metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3 user score

I guess trolls have nothing better to do with their time.

It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.

They did it to DA2, and SWTOR, and they do it to your competitors, and more. I guess there's nothing you can do about it.

[MadLaughter]

Jarrett, this game will probably be the game that gets Metacritic's attention regarding user reviews. It might do more good than harm in the long run.

[Warden130]

DJBare wrote...

www.metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3
And in obvious retaliation, someone gives it a 10, I cannot take metacritic seriously anymore.

Wait! Someone actually did take metacritic seriously?

[Fragsmater]

I think some of the reviewers were presumably expecting a little too much of the game.

[uzivatel]

eurogamer - 10/10

[Warhawk137]

Looking at the reviews on Metacritic, I don't think it's a stretch to say that it would have gotten better reviews if it didn't have multiplayer at all (and nothing else was changed), and if the advertising didn't target new players. That seems to be the complaint - that the multiplayer is nothing particularly special, and that new players won't get as much out of it as old players.

Which is obviously a bit strange, because you'd figure that a game that would get, say, a 9.5 if it didn't have multiplayer at all shouldn't be getting a 9.0 or 8.5 because it has multiplayer, but the multiplayer is only ok. Then again, there's something to be said for grading games according to what they attempt to do rather than what they are anyway... but I dunno.

[squee365]

The xbox page is handling it better than the pc page on MC

[The Elder King]

Giantbomb: 8
http://www.giantbomb...-29935/reviews/

I'm amused to the user's reviews on metacritic, both the negative and the positive one. A lot of people gave their vote without giving any explanation.
At least with DA2 a lot of reviews were explaining why they game sucks.

Modifié par hhh89, 06 mars 2012 - 08:32 .

[AkiKishi]

DJBare wrote...

www.metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3
And in obvious retaliation, someone gives it a 10, I cannot take metacritic seriously anymore.

If they had any sense they would stick to 3/4 it's much easier to sell that than 0.
Then again when reviewers give something with obvious and proven flaws 10/10 you know something is going on behind the scenes.

[Hunter of Legends]

Metacritic

serious?

Haha.

[The Last Guardian]

Warhawk137 wrote...

Looking at the reviews on Metacritic, I don't think it's a stretch to say that it would have gotten better reviews if it didn't have multiplayer at all (and nothing else was changed), and if the advertising didn't target new players. That seems to be the complaint - that the multiplayer is nothing particularly special, and that new players won't get as much out of it as old players.

Which is obviously a bit strange, because you'd figure that a game that would get, say, a 9.5 if it didn't have multiplayer at all shouldn't be getting a 9.0 or 8.5 because it has multiplayer, but the multiplayer is only ok. Then again, there's something to be said for grading games according to what they attempt to do rather than what they are anyway... but I dunno.

I'm not getting that at all. Most reviews I've read actually RAISED there score because of how enjoyable they found the mp. Even those who didn't care for the mp, admitted it wasn't bad in the least. 

Most of the low scores are mostly due to the fact that ME3 isn't a good stepping off point for newcomers, and the fact it's more of the same. 

[ObserverStatus]

Sorry about the user score Bioware, but it's probably not going to go up much until, you know, the people who like it actually finish the game. XD