557 réponses à ce sujet

[DJBare]

Giving a zero is just childish, giving a 10 is just letting the developers know they don't have to try harder next time, if you want more from your gaming experience, then use proper critique and not this childish back and forth.

[The Last Guardian]

Xbox360Achievements: 96/10

"Breathing taking, emotional conclusion"

[breyant]

1.6 wow... bet those people haven't even played the game.

[The Last Guardian]

PDesign wrote...

Eurogamer – 10/10

Vox Gaming – 10/10

PlayStation Lifestyle – 10/10

GameHunters – 4/4

The Guardian – 5/5

Gamerzines – 98/100

Xbox 360 Achievements – 96/100

IGN – 9.5/10

CVG – 9.4/10

GamesRadar – 9/10

Gamespot – 9/10

Metro – 9/10

Destructoid – 8.5/10

GiantBomb – 4/5

1UP – A

I'm guessing of metacritic score anywhere between 91-94

[Haron50]

FACE CODES!!REQUEST A FACE CODES  SOLUTION MAGAZINES MERCENARIES!!

Modifié par Haron50, 06 mars 2012 - 08:35 .

[The Last Guardian]

breyant wrote...

1.6 wow... bet those people haven't even played the game.

Butt hurt fans who are still pissed about either Dragon Age 2 dibocale, The DLC scandal, or ME3 ending. Pick your poison. Most of the impressions I've been reading have been nothing but positive. 

[TheBlackBaron]

So it's safe to conclude that, outside of the "they're getting paid to give a good review!!1!11!" conspiracy theories (which I'm sure happens, just not to the extent typically claimed) and the face import issue, this game is pretty good.

Modifié par TheBlackBaron, 06 mars 2012 - 08:35 .

[iSpitfireee]

Jarrett Lee wrote...

AmstradHero wrote...

PDesign wrote...

metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3 user score

I guess trolls have nothing better to do with their time.

It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.

Same thing happened to MW3, just dont do what they did and take it to twitter asking for people to buff the userscore

[Warhawk137]

Honestly, I keep hearing about how the critic reviews on metascore are totally inflated and the user scores are the real measure of how good a game is.

And I see this and I go... honestly?

I mean, Dragon Age II wasn't the best game ever, but it didn't deserve the four-point-something it has on metacritic, and that ME3 is getting less than that is frickin' absurd.

I'll never understand the internet.

[Weskerr]

Jarrett Lee wrote...

AmstradHero wrote...

PDesign wrote...

metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3 user score

I guess trolls have nothing better to do with their time.

It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.

No, it won't be damaging. If the game is as good as professional reviewers say it is, then the metacritic score will eventually reflect that. That's how statistics works.

[Catsith]

It's just the blob moving on to the next target, and that target is Bioware because they're still butthurt over DA2, or the dlc, or whatever. These people don't move on. They did it with CoD, they did it with Ubisoft games, they do it all the time.

[Dave of Canada]

Weskerr wrote...

No, it won't be damaging. If the game is as good as professional reviewers say it is, then the metacritic score will eventually reflect that. That's how statistics works.

Companies like EA use user scores to reflect how much money they throw on the next project, IIRC. 

[AkiKishi]

DJBare wrote...

Giving a zero is just childish, giving a 10 is just letting the developers know they don't have to try harder next time, if you want more from your gaming experience, then use proper critique and not this childish back and forth.

I think people do it to balance out what they see as paid off reviews. The people who rally behind over inflated scores are no better.

[The Last Guardian]

Thunderbolt: 9/10

[SKiLLYWiLLY2]

I've just arrived on the normandy and I'd already say it's better than ME2. Great game Bioware!

[TheBlackBaron]

Warhawk137 wrote...

Honestly, I keep hearing about how the critic reviews on metascore are totally inflated and the user scores are the real measure of how good a game is.

And I see this and I go... honestly?

I mean, Dragon Age II wasn't the best game ever, but it didn't deserve the four-point-something it has on metacritic, and that ME3 is getting less than that is frickin' absurd.

I'll never understand the internet.

Well, if we use the ten-point to its fullest extent, as opposed to the nominal 1-10 that's really a 6-10 that has conditioned us to think that a below-average or bad game gets a 6 or 7...4-point-whatever for DA2 makes a lot more sense. 

I'd have given it a (actual) 6 myself. 

[AkiKishi]

Warhawk137 wrote...

Honestly, I keep hearing about how the critic reviews on metascore are totally inflated and the user scores are the real measure of how good a game is.

And I see this and I go... honestly?

I mean, Dragon Age II wasn't the best game ever, but it didn't deserve the four-point-something it has on metacritic, and that ME3 is getting less than that is frickin' absurd.

I'll never understand the internet.

It kinda did. Certainly more than it deserved the 90's it got in some reviews.

[The Last Guardian]

NowGamer: 9.2/10

[AlexXIV]

DJBare wrote...

Giving a zero is just childish, giving a 10 is just letting the developers know they don't have to try harder next time, if you want more from your gaming experience, then use proper critique and not this childish back and forth.

Which is ok if you think that it can't get better. I mean by that logic nobody could get an A+ or 1 in school (depends what rating system you have) because that would discourage pupils from giving their best in the future. However, I didn't play ME3 yet but obviously there is stuff to criticize, so a 10/10 is probably 'overrated'.

I also don't understand why people who rate a game don't even try to hide their bias. I know in sports, like skating or dancing who live from people judging a performance they ignore the highest and lowest rating to avoid personal bias of the judges. I really think if anyone is doing 'reviewer ratings' then they should do the same. This harms metacritc as well as the game.

Anyway, even the worst game in the world should get a 3/10 or 4/10 at least. I know professional reviews don't go lower than that. So you can without problem delete all ratings that are lower than for example a 3/10 and have a 'proper' result that actually displays reviewer opinion minus trolling.

[SirCrimz]

I bet most of them are just the ones outraged by the day 1 DLC and just trying to "stick it to the man".

[fropas]

Warhawk137 wrote...

Honestly, I keep hearing about how the critic reviews on metascore are totally inflated and the user scores are the real measure of how good a game is.

And I see this and I go... honestly?

I mean, Dragon Age II wasn't the best game ever, but it didn't deserve the four-point-something it has on metacritic, and that ME3 is getting less than that is frickin' absurd.

I'll never understand the internet.

DA2 cheaped out on its game design and got everything it deserved IMO. The DLC might have been better but the game itself was an insult compared to DA:O. I hope the Mass Effect team didn't reuse the same damn areas for every dungeon or they deserve low scores too. But that's just my opinion.

[lurker541]

METACRITIC USER REVIEW CONTAINS MASSIVE SPOILER! THE GUY WHO RATED IT A 5! SAVE YOURSELF!