557 réponses à ce sujet

[Eterna]

PDesign wrote...

metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3 user score

That's just hilarious. 

[Warhawk137]

Reptillius wrote...

of course they deleted half of them. It's the only way that metacritic could still call themselves legitimate this early into things... Considering the game is barely out. Most are barely getting it installed and up and running past maybe the first area or two. Anything that doesn't come with something constructive either for or against the game will probably get shot down for the next day or two for their own sake more than that of the game.

Good!  Half of them are spam anyway and don't actually talk about the game.

[ObserverStatus]

Wow, even though he gave it an 8.5, from his tone that guy at dtoid sounded like he enjoyed it more than some of the people who gave it 9/0-95

[Butcher_of_Torfan]

Giant bomb gave it 4 out of 5 stars, saying: "It's not the best game in the trilogy, but I'd still take a decent Mass Effect game over most story-driven releases. " Reviewer admits "expectations are almost impossibly high," says that new players wont get much out of it and concludes that while it isnt the best in the series and has its flaws, its still a good game & anyone with an investment in the ME series should still check it out

Sounded like a pretty honest review

[Gibb_Shepard]

That raid is quite substantial. That's going to have a serious effect on the overall score. Lol.

[The Last Guardian]

Cheat Code Central: 4.6/5

Modifié par The Last Guardian, 06 mars 2012 - 08:58 .

[The Last Guardian]

Butcher_of_Torfan wrote...

Giant bomb gave it 4 out of 5 stars, saying: "It's not the best game in the trilogy, but I'd still take a decent Mass Effect game over most story-driven releases. " Reviewer admits "expectations are almost impossibly high," says that new players wont get much out of it and concludes that while it isnt the best in the series and has its flaws, its still a good game & anyone with an investment in the ME series should still check it out

Sounded like a pretty honest review

This is the same site that gave Syndicate a 5/5

It's just opinions.

[someguy1231]

Metacritic user reviews shouldn't be taken seriously at all. I remember when Portal 2 came out it got inundated with 0s and 1s for reasons like "it's too short" or whatever.

Oh, and I'm surprised nobody here's made the "Those reviewers were all bribed!" claim yet.

[Gibb_Shepard]

bobobo878 wrote...

Wow, even though he gave it an 8.5, from his tone that guy at dtoid sounded like he enjoyed it more than some of the people who gave it 9/0-95

That's because he reviews games properly. Most reviewrs review games on a scale of 8-10. 8 being bad, and 9 being average.

[AkiKishi]

Warhawk137 wrote...

BobSmith101 wrote...

DJBare wrote...

Giving a zero is just childish, giving a 10 is just letting the developers know they don't have to try harder next time, if you want more from your gaming experience, then use proper critique and not this childish back and forth.

I think people do it to balance out what they see as paid off reviews. The people who rally behind over inflated scores are no better.

If there were aggregate scores MAYBE that MIGHT make some kind of convoluted sense, but doing it like this just makes everyone look stupid.

It's a pure user score - so, you have nothing to truly balance.  Give the game what you actually think it deserves, and then the user score will be an actual reflection of the quality of the game, instead of a patently absurd thing that's easy to ignore.

You have to look at what it represents. Someone either loathes the game or company enough to go through effort.
Regardless of what reviewers say ,which will always be guided by potential advertising revenue. Companies pay attention to the user scores because it gives a picture beyond the current release.

Take what people have said about DA2. Yes a lot of people never got over that, sales will suffer as a result. With ME3 you have a game that people are very invested in ,even if they don't like it's direction they will swallow it because of that. That does not apply to future IP's. That's when all that "butthurt" turns around and bites you in the ass

[Warhawk137]

The Last Guardian wrote...

Cheat Code Central: 4.6/10

They rate on a 5 scale.

[The Last Guardian]

Warhawk137 wrote...

The Last Guardian wrote...

Cheat Code Central: 4.6/10

They rate on a 5 scale.

My bad typo:unsure:

[The Last Guardian]

Big Pond Arena: 9/10
GamingXP: 9.5/10

[Calibisto]

A quick warning about Metacritics. Some reviewers post spoilers in their comments.
I just gotten an eyefull of ending spoilers :-/

[TheBlackBaron]

Kotaku doesn't give out a number (and they're probably better for it), but it's a good review all the same.

http://kotaku.com/58...dium=socialflow

[Jake Boone]

Adam Sessler gave ME3 a 5/5. the first under X-Plays new system

http://www.g4tv.com/...ffect-3/review/  

[The Last Guardian]

Machinima 9.5/10

O Lawd at the User Review score for the ps3 version: 1.8/10

Christ, metacritc, please just ban user reivews all together for the games. Or do a better way of assuring that the people ACTUALLY played the game. Hell, make like a 200 word limit or something.

[AkiKishi]

As a big fan of multiple RPGs, and fan of the first two Mass Effect games, this game does not live up to current RPG standards. The plot is unusually boring, the gameplay is surprisingly lacking, the graphics and animations have barely been touched since ME2, and worst of all the game's ending is the biggest let down I've witnessed in years. The most outrageous thing about ME3 is that the day one downloadable content contains information that is crucial to the series as a whole. This game was the biggest letdown to me in years, and I almost feel as if I have been ripped off

more people should be like newtee2. Much better than just posting 0's

5/10

Modifié par BobSmith101, 06 mars 2012 - 09:04 .

[Namevah]

lurker541 wrote...
METACRITIC USER REVIEW CONTAINS MASSIVE SPOILER! THE GUY WHO RATED IT A 5! SAVE YOURSELF!

Seriously? I thought that was someone bulls***ing. That's just ****ing great.

<_<

[shepskisaac]

InB4 "these scores are too high! biased reviews!!!"

The Last Guardian wrote...

O Lawd at the User Review score for the ps3 version: 1.8/10

Christ, metacritc, please just ban user reivews all together for the games. Or do a better way of assuring that the people ACTUALLY played the game. Hell, make like a 200 word limit or something.

Sometimes, they're useful. For example, if you check Skyrim's PS3, X360 & PC review pages, you will go "wait a minute. Why is PS3 version's User Rating so much worse?" which will most likely lead unaware customer to discovering the technical issues with PS3 version. However, User Rating may be severly abused just because people don't like the company involved and/or certain aspects of a game. Gamers love to scream "scores in the press are too high! biased! EA bought the reviews!!!" yet then they proceed to give the game 0/10 as it has completly zero value. And they think THEY're unbiased right lol...

Modifié par IsaacShep, 06 mars 2012 - 09:10 .

[NoxNoctum]

I put a lot more faith in user reviews. Gaming press is sort of a joke IMO.

[Eterna]

Well, looks like they naysayers were wrong. This game is epic. 

Modifié par Eterna5, 06 mars 2012 - 09:06 .

[Catsith]

ME3 is killing it with the reviews.. holy crap. This is delicious. The haters and trolls must be absolutely seething.

[Cyberarmy]

The Last Guardian wrote...

Butcher_of_Torfan wrote...

Sounded like a pretty honest review

This is the same site that gave Syndicate a 5/5

It's just opinions.

New Syndicate, a perfect score.
Hells frozen over... And i want what that reviwers smoking/drinking.