557 réponses à ce sujet

[muse108]

Form your own opinions I have given up on all reviews but Zero Punctuation and even then just because I find them ammusing.

Just find a way to play a bit of the game before deciding if its for you or not.

[hangmans tree]

Dave of Canada wrote...

mi55ion wrote...

any this whole nonsense about how they have little to no conversational choices, STOP PLAYING ACTION MODE.. 

Done.

Wait, nothing changed.

Oh wait, cause they have a valid point.

I'd write why but I'm afraid I can't because I'm auto-posting.

hehehe he :0
Good retort is a good retort

[snfonseka]

Jarrett Lee wrote...

AmstradHero wrote...

PDesign wrote...

metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3 user score

I guess trolls have nothing better to do with their time.

It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.

huh? what? are u serious?

[mi55ion]

Dave of Canada wrote...

mi55ion wrote...

any this whole nonsense about how they have little to no conversational choices, STOP PLAYING ACTION MODE.. 

Done.

Wait, nothing changed.

Oh wait, cause they have a valid point.

I'd write why but I'm afraid I can't because I'm auto-posting.

Right and i assume you have gone through 30 odd play hours already right? completed it and marvelled at the credits at the end? or is this just another one of those, jump to conclusion from 2 hrs of gameplay?

Modifié par mi55ion, 06 mars 2012 - 09:44 .

[BentOrgy]

Dave of Canada wrote...

mi55ion wrote...

any this whole nonsense about how they have little to no conversational choices, STOP PLAYING ACTION MODE.. 

Done.

Wait, nothing changed.

Oh wait, cause they have a valid point.

I'd write why but I'm afraid I can't because I'm auto-posting.

I laughed. Then, I cried on the inside.

Because its true. Throughout the over fours hours I've played I keep thinking "Why the hell can I even make decisions? They don't even matter, and Shepard drowns out anything I did anyway."

[Dave of Canada]

snfonseka wrote...

huh? what? are u serious?

Metacritic user scores influence the parent companies drastically, some refusing to throw large budgets at the company or others refusing to pay until the score goes above XX.

[Farbautisonn]

someguy1231 wrote...

No game is perfect, but that doesn't mean no game ever deserves a perfect score. Otherwise, there'd be no point in having a maximum score at all.

-Nope.... I agree completely. But a maximum score should be reserved for those games that have everything or at least most everything down to pat. Giving ME3 a 10/10 seems to be "too much fanboi". That doesnt help either. Especially if later reviews water the game down. Then the 10/10 becomes pointless.

[AkiKishi]

snfonseka wrote...

Jarrett Lee wrote...

AmstradHero wrote...

PDesign wrote...

metacritic.com/game/pc/mass-effect-3 user score

I guess trolls have nothing better to do with their time.

It's disturbing and probably will be quite damaging.

huh? what? are u serious?

Have you never read how low meta critic scores impact on sales? Quite a large % of game buyers don't believe reviews and are guided by user scores.

[marstor05]

lool at the metacritic freakjob posters. these people should be locked up (well apart from those that gave it a 10 that is)

[Dave of Canada]

mi55ion wrote...

Right and i assume you have gone through 30 odd play hours already right? completed it and marvelled at the credits at the end? 

I've watched from start to near finish (and I've seen the "final battle" and the endings), I've read the script and I've played until past Mars (which isn't that far in but meh).

And I haven't marvelled at the credits and the end because that's the worst part.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 06 mars 2012 - 09:47 .

[snfonseka]

Dave of Canada wrote...

snfonseka wrote...

huh? what? are u serious?

Metacritic user scores influence the parent companies drastically, some refusing to throw large budgets at the company or others refusing to pay until the score goes above XX.

They are just bunch of people who don't even play the game (or even start) completely. Wait until the real ratings comeup then these negative values will be nothing.

[Zarradan]

Dave of Canada wrote...

mi55ion wrote...

Right and i assume you have gone through 30 odd play hours already right? completed it and marvelled at the credits at the end? 

I've watched from start to near finish, I've read the script and I've played until past Mars (which isn't that far in but meh).

Guess I don't know what I'm talking aboot.

So you watched it and read the script before fully playing the game?

Call me old fashioned but that'd take the edge off the experience for me...

[Namevah]

hangmans tree wrote...
I think major sites will go easy on ME3 just to fit with the fanbase and not to gat a backlash from the reader and communities alike.

Bulls***.

They have their own opinions. The problem is clearly they don't match yours so instead of respecting their opinions, you're coming up with reasons why their opinions are less valid than yours. Which is, as I wrote, bulls***. At least your attempt at an explination is better than "OMG EA gives $$$hatz."

[Valkyre4]

did IGN reviewed the game on PS3?

[someguy1231]

Dave of Canada wrote...

snfonseka wrote...

huh? what? are u serious?

Metacritic user scores influence the parent companies drastically, some refusing to throw large budgets at the company or others refusing to pay until the score goes above XX.

I think those "parent companies" are solely concerned with the reviews from professional critics, not the user reviews.

[milena87]

Farbautisonn wrote...
-Nope.... I agree completely. But a maximum score should be reserved for those games that have everything or at least most everything down to pat. Giving ME3 a 10/10 seems to be "too much fanboi". That doesnt help either. Especially if later reviews water the game down. Then the 10/10 becomes pointless.

Personally, I like the Destructoid system LInk

Modifié par milena87, 06 mars 2012 - 09:50 .

[Dave of Canada]

Zarradan wrote...

So you watched it and read the script before fully playing the game?

Call me old fashioned but that'd take the edge off the experience for me...

Glad I did, saved me from spending money on it (got it for free, non-piracy).

And that's kind of irrelevent to the auto-dialogue.

[Dave of Canada]

someguy1231 wrote...

I think those "parent companies" are solely concerned with the reviews from professional critics, not the user reviews.

Except I'm not talking about hypotheticals, I'm talking about what actually happens in the industry.

[Zarradan]

So are the conspiracy theorists suggesting we should pay more attention to the current user scores and reviews?

[Yuqi]

Oh look it's the DA2 fiasco all over again..

[snfonseka]

Dave of Canada wrote...

mi55ion wrote...

Right and i assume you have gone through 30 odd play hours already right? completed it and marvelled at the credits at the end? 

I've watched from start to near finish (and I've seen the "final battle" and the endings), I've read the script and I've played until past Mars (which isn't that far in but meh).

And I haven't marvelled at the credits and the end because that's the worst part.

So basically you are judging an interactive medium by just "watching and reading". Someting like judging whether a movie is bad or good by reading in script.

[Kaiser Shepard]

marstor05 wrote...

lool at the metacritic freakjob posters. these people should be locked up (well apart from those that gave it a 10 that is)

I'm glad someone is still objective in all this.

Oh wait...

[Dave of Canada]

snfonseka wrote...

So basically you are judging an interactive medium by just "watching and reading". Someting like judging whether a movie is bad or good by reading in script.

I'm judging an interactive medium by watching and reading how uninteractive it is, how dare I question how there's barely any dialogue prompts. I need to watch auto-dialogue to see how uninteractive it is.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 06 mars 2012 - 09:55 .