1. With the benefit of hindsight, I was planning on doing a master save where I would go do all the things that gave me the best chance at defeating the reapers. Like I thought Zaeed wouldn't stick around to help with the reapers, Thane wouldn't be alive by now, and Jack was too much of a psycho so I let those 3 die in ME2. I was going to change all that. With the benefit of hindsight, I see all of that is meaningless.
Some of the actions in the previous 2 games didn't change the story enough. What does saving/destroying the collector base do? Next to nothing.
They could've done much more. Like if you made Mordin feel guilty during those long talks in ME2, maybe he cures the genophage even if you try to sabotage it. Or some disloyal ME2 squad mate tries to fight you. That sort of thing.
I get it now, Mass Effect is the opposite of The Butterfly Effect.
2. ME3 is the end of Shepard's story. So why is it that in the only ending where Shepard supposedly lives, we only see someone's chest with an N7 emblem? For all we know that could be anyone or the recent inductee James Vega. Why not actually show Shepard rising from the ruins like in ME1?
3. I honestly thought we would get some lord of the rings like epilogue in one of the good endings where we finally got to see what happened as a result of our actions. There would be little blue children if you romanced Liara, Krogan kids if the genophage was cured, unmasked Quarians etc.
Yeah that kind of ending sounds amazing right about now
Modifié par Tony208, 09 mars 2012 - 04:52 .