428 réponses à ce sujet

[double02]

SpectreSaren wrote...

Mass Effect 3: destroyer of Borderlands 2, Halo 4, Assassin's Creed III, Max Payne 3, Far Cry 3, Call of Duty: 17, Bioshock Infinite, and all the other pretenders.

Game of the year 2012.

I think you mean "contenders".

The game is awesome. I'm about 5+ hours in and am loving it as expected. These ratings are well deserved.

[FERMi27]

Looks like ME3 kicked the crap out of DA2.

[ev76]

Well deserved bioware! I'm about 3 hours into game and I must say it is glorious thus far!

[Phoenix_Fyre]

Wow! I'm gonna look at a few of them

mailman is delivering as I type. Sooo hard to not check my box and rush to the office to pick up my package

[Simotech]

goty 2012?

[xsdob]

rob593 wrote...

Why would anyone who seriously reviews a game give it 10/10 or a 5/5

Are we expected to believe that they thought the game was the best game ever created, with absolutely 0 problems in any part of it.

Pointless scoring system seems pointless.

I don't think I would rate even my most beloved and bestest game ever a 10/10 or a 5/5 it's almost an impossibility. And more to the point what is the point of reading a review that scores like that, it's clearly not going to accurately review a product.

Regardless it seems overall that ME3 was well received, Well done Bioware.

Well, you could always look at the metacritic scores, which say either 0 or 2 out of ten. And as far as I can tell, the only game that deserves that type of score is Atari's ET the video game.

[FlashHand777]

xsdob wrote...

rob593 wrote...

Why would anyone who seriously reviews a game give it 10/10 or a 5/5

Are we expected to believe that they thought the game was the best game ever created, with absolutely 0 problems in any part of it.

Pointless scoring system seems pointless.

I don't think I would rate even my most beloved and bestest game ever a 10/10 or a 5/5 it's almost an impossibility. And more to the point what is the point of reading a review that scores like that, it's clearly not going to accurately review a product.

Regardless it seems overall that ME3 was well received, Well done Bioware.

Well, you could always look at the metacritic scores, which say either 0 or 2 out of ten. And as far as I can tell, the only game that deserves that type of score is Atari's ET the video game.

The Metacritic user scores are simply silly, posted by demagogues and drama queens or saboteurs.
Despite any issues I might have with the game, there is no way it's 2 out of 10 bad.

[Chris Priestly]

TMJfin wrote...

Finnish "Pelaaja" gave ME3 9/10  Review in Finnish of course. www.pelaajalehti.com/uutiset/pelaaja-lehden-mass-effect-3-arvostelu

Got it. Thanks.

[panamakira]

Auto-Pilot. That's all I'm going to say.

[Wise Men]

This is pretty impressive.  Rarely do we see a game that's rated that hight accross the board.  I'm happy to hear that others appreciate the game like I do.

[lil_89]

 Just wanted to share that two norwegian sites gave ME3 6/6  

www.vg.no/spill/artikkel.php
www.pressfire.no/anmeldelser/Xbox360/4813/Mass-Effect-3

and another 9/10
www.gamereactor.no/anmeldelser/135401/Mass+Effect+3/

these three are some of the most popular gaming-sites and one of them is norways biggest news paper, so pretty good news for all norwegian fans of the series  

Modifié par lil_89, 06 mars 2012 - 06:28 .

[The Elder King]

Multiplayer.it gave a 9.5

http://multiplayer.i...?piattaforma=pc

Spaziogames.it gave a 9.5 too.
http://www.spaziogam...s-effect-3.aspx

Modifié par hhh89, 06 mars 2012 - 06:40 .

[thatdude90210]

 Shacknews review: www.shacknews.com/article/72733/mass-effect-3-review
I don't think they gave a numeric score, but the word "epic" was used a few times.

[wisperhill]

the Belgian game site: 9lives, gave the pc-version of Mass Effect 3 a 90/100
pc.9lives.be/games/mass-effect-3/reviews/mass-effect-3

[jonothanster]

Hey, I hate to be 'that guy', but I can't help but point out that while the metacritic score for professional reviewers is 93, the user score is a terrible, terrible 2.4... What's the deal with this disparity? Why are critics giving this game a tounge-bath while users are screaming bloody murder?

[DatIrishFella]

jonothanster wrote...

Hey, I hate to be 'that guy', but I can't help but point out that while the metacritic score for professional reviewers is 93, the user score is a terrible, terrible 2.4... What's the deal with this disparity? Why are critics giving this game a tounge-bath while users are screaming bloody murder?

It was like that with CoD, and no I'm not comparing the two directly, just their similar appeal to professional reviewers and hatred among users. 

Guess we'll just have to try it ourselves. 

[Storm Vermin]

Polish gaming magazine, CD-Action, gave ME3 9/10. Reviewer says the game is really epic.

http://www.cdaction....recenzja.html  

[Chrysantemum]

Gamer.nl, one of our more prominent local dutch game sites has it at 9,5. A near perfect experience.

http://www.gamer.nl/...mass-effect-3-1

congratulations, folks at Bioware! Now I just have to wait till midnight tomorrow for the damn thing to unlock.

Modifié par Chrysantemum, 06 mars 2012 - 07:15 .

[Chrysantemum]

jonothanster wrote...

Hey, I hate to be 'that guy', but I can't help but point out that while the metacritic score for professional reviewers is 93, the user score is a terrible, terrible 2.4... What's the deal with this disparity? Why are critics giving this game a tounge-bath while users are screaming bloody murder?

It's quite simple - anyone with an opinion and a keyboard can add a review on metacritic. This is why user scores on metacritic are never to be taken seriously, ever. Some of the 'reviews' are good for a chuckle, though.

[legion999]

jonothanster wrote...

Hey, I hate to be 'that guy', but I can't help but point out that while the metacritic score for professional reviewers is 93, the user score is a terrible, terrible 2.4... What's the deal with this disparity? Why are critics giving this game a tounge-bath while users are screaming bloody murder?

Because most of the Metacritic reviews are either by trolls or morons. They give a game 0 for one flaw, a blatant lie or something which is flat out ridculous (such as gay sex scenes). Also some people give games give a game 10 for no reason either which isn't helpful.

Modifié par legion999, 06 mars 2012 - 07:29 .

[Wittand25]

Gamers.at (an Austrian website/magazine) gave it 91%

[Arppis]

"Pelaaja" is there, but not "Pelit", shame. But I'll propably find out what their score is this month.

But, GOOD JOB Bioware. Good job.

Modifié par Arppis, 06 mars 2012 - 07:33 .

[Arkitekt]

There are some jewels in metacritic. I enjoyed the trolling on this one (gave a ten out of ten):

This stunning game is by far the best of the trilogy. I tried playing the first one like 2 years ago and i couldn't figure out how to do all that stupid rpg crap. I love how this game just lets you run around and kill stuff without all those menus slowing you down. The story was a constant rollercoaster ride that keeps throwing curveballs at you. I was on the edge of my seat for the whole 7 hour campaign. Bioware has released another timeless classic that will be remembered forever. This truly is a company that can do no wrong

Ahah. classic metacritic!

[ognick23]

lol if you believe someone that gives ME3 a 0 or 2 out of 10 then this series isnt for you anyway because a 2/10 means dont even look in the direction of the video game box when u see it on store shelves lol

[SpectreSaren]

double02 wrote...

SpectreSaren wrote...

Mass Effect 3: destroyer of Borderlands 2, Halo 4, Assassin's Creed III, Max Payne 3, Far Cry 3, Call of Duty: 17, Bioshock Infinite, and all the other pretenders.

Game of the year 2012.

I think you mean "contenders".

The game is awesome. I'm about 5+ hours in and am loving it as expected. These ratings are well deserved.

No. I meant what I said.