172 réponses à ce sujet

[squee365]

OP. The game is great. I find myself scanning for any and ever war asset, theres a ridiculous amount of stuff to do. Knowing the script I have only delved into 20% of the story and I have played the game for 10 hours. I'd write my own review but at the moment I'm having too much fun. I had to make myself stop because I have homework to do!

[Savber100]

These same trolls review-bombed Portal 2...

Let me repeat that as they REVIEW-BOMBED a Valve game just because of some cosmetic DLC.

Can you honestly trust these fickle creatures? It's sad how even Valve is not safe from these guys.

[The Executioner]

To me the game is a step up from ME2 the graphics and animations look much better imo.

[BuffPhantoms]

Abirn wrote...

I trust user reviews more than I trust "professional" reviewers.
 

If you trust metacritic user reviews, not enough bad things can be said about you.

Those are troll bomb reviews, most of the time. 

[Han Shot First]

I'm still near the beginning of the game, but I love it so far.

[gabe2gg]

Moonshadow_Dark wrote...

Really? Because I've seen a ton of reviews from PROFESSIONALS that indicate otherwise. IGN, Game Informer, G4 etc. All of them gave it a great score. Not to mention, the greatest and most reputable reviewer I know gave it a seal of approval: My own personal tastes. And that guy? He always knows what I like 100% of the time.

None of those reviews give any valid issue with the reduced dialong options and face import issues. The only valid review out of all of these is edge and giant bomb which gave ME3 8/10. It was a balanced review and not overly gushing with praise and no flaws.

[SilentWolfie]

I think it feels pretty much like an 8/10 for now. The system is overwhelming for me, and the dialogue wheels doesn't seem to show any indicators on what sort of aftermath is going to happen. During the *robot* mission at the start, I headshot it with a sniper rifle and it didn't went down, guess what happens next. That was terribly lame.

Add to that with other issues like Bioware ENFORCING it like a MMO (I read something about how single campaigns make it significantly harder to have a good ending) and no cheats enabled etc... If I wanted a MMO, I would have bought one. There are quite a few moments of rage, I would think.

There's also the DLC, MMO payout for rare items, god knows what else EA is trying to do. This is brutal, I think. No wonder people are angry. Before the immersion of the game, comes the frigging real life fleecing.

=|

[Kaedan94]

It's for one and a half reasons:

1) With the constant growth of internet culture, Trolls have been allowed to procreate unabounded, like the Krogan before the Genophage, and have taken over the internet.

The 1/2 is the reason the trolls are doing it. Most do it simply because they are trolls. However, many this time are doing it because they are irrationally upset about having to pay $10 for content that came with the CE.

[AlanC9]

BuffPhantoms wrote...
If you trust metacritic user reviews, not enough bad things can be said about you.

Hey, he might just not know any better.

[Gatt9]

Moonshadow_Dark wrote...

Really? Because I've seen a ton of reviews from PROFESSIONALS that indicate otherwise. IGN, Game Informer, G4 etc. All of them gave it a great score. Not to mention, the greatest and most reputable reviewer I know gave it a seal of approval: My own personal tastes. And that guy? He always knows what I like 100% of the time.

How do those professionals get paid?  From the revenue raised by advertisements.  Because you absolutely don't pay them a dime.

What happens when the "professional" gives a game a bad review?  The advertiser stops advertising.  Then there's no money to pay anyone,  and no money to maintain the site.

"Professional" reviews are useless,  because of the way the system works,  it's not in their favor to be objective.

Case-in-point:  Every single PS3 Skyrim review,  that neglected to mention the game-killing bugs.

[Moonshadow_Dark]

Gatt9 wrote...

Moonshadow_Dark wrote...

Really? Because I've seen a ton of reviews from PROFESSIONALS that indicate otherwise. IGN, Game Informer, G4 etc. All of them gave it a great score. Not to mention, the greatest and most reputable reviewer I know gave it a seal of approval: My own personal tastes. And that guy? He always knows what I like 100% of the time.

How do those professionals get paid?  From the revenue raised by advertisements.  Because you absolutely don't pay them a dime.

What happens when the "professional" gives a game a bad review?  The advertiser stops advertising.  Then there's no money to pay anyone,  and no money to maintain the site.

"Professional" reviews are useless,  because of the way the system works,  it's not in their favor to be objective.

Case-in-point:  Every single PS3 Skyrim review,  that neglected to mention the game-killing bugs.

Really? If they give a bad review, then they don't get paid? So please explain how Dragon Age 2 got such a bad score. How Barbie Horse Adventure got panned. How Big Mutha Truckers got flushed.

User opinion is no more reputable than professional. Half the time, user reviews are one sided depending on wether the reviewer loves the game too much to be objective or dead set against it that they never name a single good thing.

[Repearized Miranda]

Moonshadow_Dark wrote...

User opinion is no more reputable than professional. Half the time, user reviews are one sided depending on wether the reviewer loves the game too much to be objective or dead set against it that they never name a single good thing.

^ This, but most would take:

"This game isn't as good as I thought." vs. "This game is pure trash!" even if it is pure trash, I take the former review to see if the latter holds up; however, if I take too much stock in it, chances are it will because it clouded my thinking. This is something extreme reviews tend to end up doing if you aren't careful.

[Xeranx]

Bawseee wrote...

Y'know, people are really upset about the amount of auto-dialogue, and I was to, but it really isn't that bad when you are playing. The dialogue wheel is still there and it's there enough to matter. That is the only downside to this game, everything else is flawless. The story, combat, graphics, etc.

The auto-dialogue was something they said they were going to look at.  This was mentioned regarding LOTSB.  I hated it in LOTSB and I figured it was going to happen again.  Sure enough it did.

[Henriks]

Many people were expecting another ending and more from their favourite ME2 character. Well, Miranda has only a camel in the game, so players expecting to see her again in this game to carry on the previous romance will fell depressed.

People expecting to destroy the reapers only to see a happy ending with Liara or Tali will also get depressed. They were expecting something like Star Wars or Avatar, with a happy ending for everyone.

ME3 is a great game after all.

[The Executioner]

Miranda's removel as a squad member is my biggest problem with ME3 so far.

[SyyRaaaN]

Henriks wrote...

Many people were expecting another ending and more from their favourite ME2 character. Well, Miranda has only a camel in the game, so players expecting to see her again in this game to carry on the previous romance will fell depressed.

People expecting to destroy the reapers only to see a happy ending with Liara or Tali will also get depressed. They were expecting something like Star Wars or Avatar, with a happy ending for everyone.

ME3 is a great game after all.

No, its not about a happy ending. Its about a relevant ending for this game. Having the reaper harvesting us all would have been a much better ending than this troll one. For sure. Now that would have been something; humanity having the same fate as the protheans.

Would have been cool for me. But this thing they did. It was a rape on the series.

Modifié par SyyRaaaN, 07 mars 2012 - 04:29 .

[Henriks]

SyyRaaaN wrote...


No, its not about a happy ending. Its about a relevant ending for this game. Having the reaper harvesting us all would have been a much better ending than this troll one. For sure. Now that would have been something; humanity having the same fate as the protheans.

Would have been cool for me. But this thing they did. It was a rape on the series.

See it? Because YOU think the ending is stupid, you think the game is a crap.

I'm not sure its the ending I wanted, but its still a greate game.

[ThirtyS1x]

I have no idea where your getting your Reviews,but every single review I've have saw,is positive if not perfect,I did second opinion of IGN under Patrick,and I gave it a almost perfect.It's a amazing game,not to mention,I find it hilarious that almost every single person bashing Mass Effect 3 on this Thread don't even have the game,or registered.

Modifié par ThirtyS1x, 07 mars 2012 - 04:37 .

[mybudgee]

Very Good game. Amazing bugs! (facial import bug is my favorite!!)

Modifié par mybudgee, 07 mars 2012 - 04:35 .

[ThirtyS1x]

Henriks wrote...

Many people were expecting another ending and more from their favourite ME2 character. Well, Miranda has only a camel in the game, so players expecting to see her again in this game to carry on the previous romance will fell depressed.

People expecting to destroy the reapers only to see a happy ending with Liara or Tali will also get depressed. They were expecting something like Star Wars or Avatar, with a happy ending for everyone.

ME3 is a great game after all.

 Listen,you dont even have the game registered,and not to mention what your saying "People expecting to destroy the reapers" is a spoil in a non-spoil Location.

Modifié par ThirtyS1x, 07 mars 2012 - 04:40 .

[SyyRaaaN]

Henriks wrote...

SyyRaaaN wrote...


No, its not about a happy ending. Its about a relevant ending for this game. Having the reaper harvesting us all would have been a much better ending than this troll one. For sure. Now that would have been something; humanity having the same fate as the protheans.

Would have been cool for me. But this thing they did. It was a rape on the series.

See it? Because YOU think the ending is stupid, you think the game is a crap.

I'm not sure its the ending I wanted, but its still a greate game.

You can read my review in the game owners forum. I dont think the game is crap, i think its both good and bad. But the ending is seriously one of the worst things they could have done thinking what direction the series took. What i remember from the game, now after ive finished it, isn't the great moments in it, but rahter this ending that was so horrible that it cannot be overseen.

Modifié par SyyRaaaN, 07 mars 2012 - 04:41 .

[Corvus Metus]

gearseffect wrote...



SORRY If YOU DON"T WANT TO READ MY ABOVE HERE IS A SHORT VERSION OF IT ALL

Here is a video of Mass Effect 1 being talked about by Casey Hudson back at E3 2006, this is what sold me on ME and so far the BW have delivered on making the most player driven story MY STORY! I think some (or many) feel as if they have been let down and the series has lost what made it great in the last chapter to THEIR Shepard's story.



I think this vid is essential to any fan of the series, it is very much the promises and concept the series was built upon.


www.youtube.com/watch

That video actually depresses the **** out of me because ME1's dialogue system was... Lackluster, IMO. 

Paragon and neutral lines were often the same and in many important story moments had no real choice, just the illusion of it. 

Hell, Planescape: Torment had much better conversations.

[Henriks]

ThirtyS1x wrote...

 Listen,you dont even have the game registered,and not to mention what your saying "People expecting to destroy the reapers" is a spoil in a non-spoil Location.

LMAO

"Expcting to destroy the reapers" is a spoil? Really?

And I have to buy the game to play it? What If my girlfriend have the game? So I'm playing the game, I already know about the endings and I can discuss the game in this section because its not requered to register the game to post here.

[ThirtyS1x]

Henriks wrote...

ThirtyS1x wrote...

 Listen,you dont even have the game registered,and not to mention what your saying "People expecting to destroy the reapers" is a spoil in a non-spoil Location.

LMAO

"Expcting to destroy the reapers" is a spoil? Really?

And I have to buy the game to play it? What If my girlfriend have the game? So I'm playing the game, I already know about the endings and I can discuss the game in this section because its not requered to register the game to post here.

Yes,it's,because some people expect to destroy the Reapers in the ending,and unless you go and leech off your "Girlfriend" to play it how it's supposed to be played,anything you say should be held with a grain of sault.

[Carnage752]

Don't listen to metacritic. It's pretty stupid idea. And so far the game is awesome, just pure awesome! My only concerns were the silly animations, face import bug (Being fixed), and increased auto dialogue (Though it's not increased horribly, plenty of choices left).