Romance - Why not?
#1
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 01:53
However, I heard some people saying around here that they were really trying to stay away from romancing a party member as much as possible. Why?
Is it for role-playing reasons? Is it because you find these romances too "cheesy"?
For me, I think the romances in the previous Bioware games were very un-life-like, so I can understand where you're coming from when you say "They're too cheesy for me". However, don't ask me why, but I think that's exactly one of the facts why they fascinate me so much.
In BG2 you had three interesting romances (+ a few interesting mod-romances): Jaheira was a very interesting character (and very resisting at times). Aerie was super-cute and you just HAD TO like her. And Viconia was... well, she was quite different.
The Bastila-Romance was not deep enough but still awesome and a very important part of the game for me.
The romances in Mass Effect were much too short for my tast.
And I can't really remember Jade Empire at all... Although I know there was romance SOMEWHERE in it... Right?
So, anyway, why not romance in Dragon Age? And if you say "No, I don't want to romance." then based on which experience are you trying to avoid them? Were it the KOTOR-romances which made you stay away from more in the future? Was it Mass Effect? It can't possibly be BG2 with these beautiful three characters that these virtual women are, right?
#2
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 01:58
#3
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:01
I personally liked the Bastila-romance quite a lot. It offered an added conflict to the game, which you could eventually solve for the better or abruptly and cruelly cut short.
The romances in Mass Effect were indeed too short. They were rather 'meh', not much happened there and it was all a little fast.
Jade Empire... I don't think there was a romance option in there actually. At least I can't remember anything from that in terms of romance.
I am glad that Dragon Age: Origins too will have romantic options. I did not read a lot about it, beyond that I know who can be your 'significant other'.
#4
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:04
Haasth wrote...
Jade Empire... I don't think there was a romance option in there actually. At least I can't remember anything from that in terms of romance.
There were plenty of romances there.
The Bastila one I kind of stumbled into since I wanted to mess with her. Yes, being a jerk is fun in games
#5
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:12
Herr Uhl wrote...
Haasth wrote...
Jade Empire... I don't think there was a romance option in there actually. At least I can't remember anything from that in terms of romance.
There were plenty of romances there.
Hmm.. Well it's been a long time since I played that. Can't say I remember any of them.
#6
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:14
But... As long as they don't force the romance plot down my throat I could really care less.
#7
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:14
AlkanineMS wrote...
I don't want to catch virtual STDs.
Wear a virtual condom.
#8
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:15
As for NWN, I think I remember dating Sharwyn, and I had to replay HoTU with a male character after starting with a female elf because I just had to get Nathyrra(sp?).
NWN2: No thanks, no options. I started as a female char and made sure that stupid Paladin NEVER gets into my party unless the game forces me. And I killed Bishop with a passion. The girls weren't attractive enough to justify replaying with a male character, especially not the horrible Shandra (or whatever). Oh, if my female char could've had Sand as an option though... anyway, after NWN2 I thought I'm done with trying out those plotlines, but of course NWN2 was not a Bioware game.
Jade Empire: I never finished it nor did I get far into the game (I really should try it again). From hearsay I remember there are quite a few romance options, even gay.
Well, the romances in all those games are very cheesy, but I guess that makes them fun to play. Others look for some serious saving-the-world and their characters don't have time for this, that's cool, to each their own.
#9
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:16
Count Viceroy wrote...
AlkanineMS wrote...
I don't want to catch virtual STDs.
Wear a virtual condom.
In DA-O that would involve wearing a sheeps skin, no thanks bro.
#10
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:22
AlkanineMS wrote...
Count Viceroy wrote...
AlkanineMS wrote...
I don't want to catch virtual STDs.
Wear a virtual condom.
In DA-O that would involve wearing a sheeps skin, no thanks bro.
Skin? Surely you jest, a proper medieval condom is made by intestines.
#11
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:24
#12
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:28
#13
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:31
#14
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:32
Herr Uhl wrote...
AlkanineMS wrote...
Count Viceroy wrote...
AlkanineMS wrote...
I don't want to catch virtual STDs.
Wear a virtual condom.
In DA-O that would involve wearing a sheeps skin, no thanks bro.
Skin? Surely you jest, a proper medieval condom is made by intestines.
Yes, but they still called them "sheepskins". They actually still make them.
Modifié par Naelven, 02 novembre 2009 - 02:32 .
#15
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:36
#16
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:37
Naelven wrote...
Yes, but they still called them "sheepskins". They actually still make them.
Yes, but using actual sheep skin would chafe... a lot.
#17
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 02:38
Herr Uhl wrote...
Naelven wrote...
Yes, but they still called them "sheepskins". They actually still make them.
Yes, but using actual sheep skin would chafe... a lot.
Yeah...wool makes me pretty itchy...
#18
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 03:11
AlkanineMS wrote...
I don't want to catch virtual STDs.
I heard if you get virtual Hep C every character you create in DAO after that has it. True Story.
#19
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 03:30
#20
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 03:42
But in Jade Empire and Mass Effect things just felt weird and awkward, and as such I don't see myself interested in pursuing it this time around.
#21
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 06:16
Naelven wrote...
Romances in video games often come off as romantic novels or soap opera emotive style. It's fake and over the top. As a married man maybe I'm a bit jaded, but I think romance plots in video games are campy at best, and totally ruin the gaming experience at worst. On top of all this, the plausibility of having a romantic relationship while also trying to save the world just doesn't fit for me.
But... As long as they don't force the romance plot down my throat I could really care less.
Wow, isn't "saving the world and finding your loved one while you're at it" one of the main themes in nearly all Hollywood movies? Not that this has to say anything, but to me it just belongs to a great story, that a great hero falls greatly in love. Don't ask me why, it's probably something psychological, remember, all this stuff is some kind of projection.
#22
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 06:18
frylock23 wrote...
I generally enjoy the romances in games/books/movies; however, there usually isn't a whole lot of depth in the ones I've come across. I can supply the depth in my own mind to make it seem less ... shallow, and this goes for movies, books, and games. In the limited time you have to meet and develop the characters involved, there just isn't time in most cases to provide enough background and interaction to make the base relationship seem plausible. I supply the depth if I get the sense that the characters have been in close proximity to one another long enough, with enough affinity (or enough shared life and death situations), to have developed that deeper, more realistic bond.
Wow, I thought I was the only one doing that more or less actively.
(I say actively because I believe we do that on a sub-conscious level anyway)
#23
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 06:37
It's quite simply because there's no romance to fit elves. Or dwarves. On average, of course. The world is filled to the brim with deviants. My character isn't one of them.KingSarevok wrote...
The romances are going to be an integral part of the Dragon Age experience for me, just like in BG2, KOTOR, Mass Effect and Jade Empire.
However, I heard some people saying around here that they were really trying to stay away from romancing a party member as much as possible. Why?
Is it for role-playing reasons? Is it because you find these romances too "cheesy"?
[...]
#24
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 07:17
1) I'm not much into "romances" in general. Give me strong platonic bonds any day over the kissy-kissy goo.
2) I'm a gay woman. Not many games actually offer a F/F relationship, and I'm not interested as playing my characters straight, or male.
3) Many "romances" in games feel silly, tacked-on, rushed or forced. Or all of these.
4) In order to even consider it, I have to at least be able to tolerate the NPC OOC, and she has to suit a given character of mine IC. I never make a character with the purpose of being compatible with certain NPCs, instead I choose those party members who suit my character (in a romantic or platonic way).
One of my two planned human characters may end up with Leliana, we will see. The dwarf and the elf would never bed a non-dwarf or non-elf, respectively. I just don't like cross-species relationships as a rule, it can too easily lead to "humans in funny suits" syndrome if everyone humps everyone no matter what species.
Modifié par Korva, 02 novembre 2009 - 07:22 .
#25
Posté 02 novembre 2009 - 07:25
KingSarevok wrote...
For me, I think the romances in the previous Bioware games were very un-life-like, so I can understand where you're coming from when you say "They're too cheesy for me". However, don't ask me why, but I think that's exactly one of the facts why they fascinate me so much.
Basically this, Bio romances just tend to rub me the wrong way. Also the characters hold very little interest for me in the romance department .
Modifié par Saurel, 02 novembre 2009 - 07:25 .





Retour en haut






