453 réponses à ce sujet

[Super.Sid]

BuffPhantoms wrote...

93.5% and 95%. Thats the official ME3 average review ratings.

Anything else is you guessing.

Those reviews are inaccurate. Reviewers don't put enough time to review a game and judge it only based on the positive aspects of it.

The spoiler sections are flooded now.

This is a non spoiler section else I would have given u images as proof of what is actually going on.

Fine, don't listen to me but be prepared to be disappointed later.

[BuffPhantoms]

Super.Sid wrote...

BuffPhantoms wrote...

93.5% and 95%. Thats the official ME3 average review ratings.

Anything else is you guessing.

Those reviews are inaccurate.  

A proven and organized mega review bomb raid (which this thread is about) is even more inaccurate.

[Gigamantis]

Super.Sid wrote...

Gigamantis wrote...

Super.Sid wrote...

BuffPhantoms wrote...

The majority of the people who have finished the game have not liked it

Proof? And please don't link MC user reviews as proof, since that was proven as raided.

Go and look at the spoiler section if u must.

That doesn't really prove anything.  10-15 people spamming up the spoiler section are hardly proven to be the majority in a game that likely sold millions. 

Its not 10-15 people its a lot more. Besides they are not the same company any more, their ideals have changed.

It's a lot more, huh?  How many millions more?  It's going to take a lot to prove it's the majority and it only takes about 10 people to spam up a forum. 

As for Bioware's ideals, you have no idea what they are and they're not what we're talking about. 

[Super.Sid]

BuffPhantoms wrote...

Super.Sid wrote...

BuffPhantoms wrote...

93.5% and 95%. Thats the official ME3 average review ratings.

Anything else is you guessing.

Those reviews are inaccurate.  

A proven and organized mega review bomb raid (which this thread is about) is even more inaccurate.

Fine, have it your way but don't say we didn't warn you.

[BuffPhantoms]

You seem upset that I am putting more cred on tons of professional reviews over an organized 4chan raid.

This is laughable.

The user reviews are 80% and above on other sites.

Modifié par BuffPhantoms, 08 mars 2012 - 06:44 .

[Gigamantis]

Super.Sid wrote...

BuffPhantoms wrote...

93.5% and 95%. Thats the official ME3 average review ratings.

Anything else is you guessing.

Those reviews are inaccurate. Reviewers don't put enough time to review a game and judge it only based on the positive aspects of it.

The spoiler sections are flooded now.

This is a non spoiler section else I would have given u images as proof of what is actually going on.

Fine, don't listen to me but be prepared to be disappointed later.

Funny you say reviewers don't put in enough time, while they had advance copies and spent weeks on their reviews.  Reviewers spent weeks while the user reviewers were made literal hours after release.  Trying to paint the professional reviews as incomplete work while praising user reviews is hilarious. 

[Super.Sid]

BuffPhantoms wrote...

You seem upset that I am putting more cred on tons of professional reviews over an organized 4chan raid.

This is laughable.

The user reviews are 80% and above on other sites.

Read this article about why professional aka paid reviews are inaccurate

http://www.gamerevol...em-reviews-6199

[BuffPhantoms]

Super.Sid wrote...

BuffPhantoms wrote...

You seem upset that I am putting more cred on tons of professional reviews over an organized 4chan raid.

This is laughable.

The user reviews are 80% and above on other sites.

Read this article about why professional aka paid reviews are inaccurate

http://www.gamerevol...em-reviews-6199

Do you have any proof that bioware payed off all 40 reviews?

This is silly. Are you trolling?

[Rinor]

How about deleting 10/10-transcends video games trololol-bogus-reviews as well then?

[Gigamantis]

Super.Sid wrote...

BuffPhantoms wrote...

You seem upset that I am putting more cred on tons of professional reviews over an organized 4chan raid.

This is laughable.

The user reviews are 80% and above on other sites.

Read this article about why professional aka paid reviews are inaccurate

http://www.gamerevol...em-reviews-6199

Of course publishers will get pissy when journalists give bad reviews to high profile games.  The job of a journalist is to suck it up and continue being honest, and they have been.  Duke Nukem Forever got absolutely destroyed by journalists as did many other bad games. 

[Super.Sid]

BuffPhantoms wrote...

Super.Sid wrote...

BuffPhantoms wrote...

You seem upset that I am putting more cred on tons of professional reviews over an organized 4chan raid.

This is laughable.

The user reviews are 80% and above on other sites.

Read this article about why professional aka paid reviews are inaccurate

http://www.gamerevol...em-reviews-6199

Do you have any proof that bioware payed off all 40 reviews?

This is silly. Are you trolling?

Thats ok if you think I'm trolling, it's your point of view. I would like to close the discussion from my end.

[Therefore_I_Am]

Meta users remind me of that heckler from Happy Gilmore. You just want to reach through the monitor and punch them in the faces.

[pavi132]

I wonder how much they paid metacritic to do that? lol

[BuffPhantoms]

pavi132 wrote...

I wonder how much they paid metacritic to do that? lol

More like MC noticed this was probably the biggest review bombing they've had, and don't want to contineu to look like a joke site?

[Fojos-]

Super.Sid wrote...

Soulwatcher1974 wrote...

Great so they take the right of free speech away because EA complained?

This person says the truth. All the people playing/about to play the game are blind out of excitement. We will have to see your reaction after you finish the game.

Hi. Rating a whole game by its ending is moronic.

[Joy Divison]

Gigamantis wrote...

Yawn, prove that these journalists are being blackmailed or just stop.  Oh, and don't link a blog with some kids theory on the industry. 

Links and explanations have already been provided for you on this topic and it is quite obvious you want to keep you head in the sand.

[BatmanPWNS]

The user score seems to be 5/10 now. But, oh well, they must be bribed too by hater logic.

[Ianamus]

I personally believe that all 1/10 and 10/10 reviews should be removed, as both are complete rubbish scores that should be reserved for the idealised "best game ever" and theoretical "worst game ever". Realistically everything should fall in-between and I've noticed that in metacritic very few reviews are amber, they are all either the highest scores possible or the worst.

That said, the professional reviews (Especially the ones on metacritic) are just as bad. Great a game as it may be, between the serious bugs (inability to import ME1 Shepard), several developer oversights, the bad voice acting of the kid and the general issues with the ending, I do not think that the game deserves a 100/100, by any stretch, as some professional reviews gave it. 

This, comming from a proffesinal level, is much worse than the people who rate it 1/10. I can almost understand why they are doing it- if only as a punch in the face to some of the ridiculous "professional" reviews on there. 

Modifié par EJ107, 08 mars 2012 - 07:32 .

[Warikz]

I generally trust Eurogamer, so them giving it a 10/10 is very surprising, but certainly adds weight behind the game being very good in my eyes. Other reviews like PC gamer etc, I won't even bother with, as there's no point. There's a reason I only tend to read Rock,Paper, Shotgun's (other than Eurogamers) 'reviews' of games, though.. If you want frank honesty from people who have played the full game with no score attached to the bottom( forcing you to read the damn thoughts of the writer) then they're the way to go.

Modifié par Warikz, 08 mars 2012 - 07:51 .

[Giantdeathrobot]

Metacritic is worthless anyhow. So long as people who cannot prove they have played the game to it's end can post, and so long as they are forced to attach a number to their review, the data will always be extremely flawed and non-representative as soon as one feature pisses of a given group of keyboard warriors. And press reviews are just as flawed since they need to please the major publishers to get exclusives and all that. We really need professionnal, respected critics such as Roger Erbert, not butthurt fanboys and money-hungry review sites. Closest thing we have is friggin Yahtzee.

[Mike_Neel]

So wait. If someone posts a negative review pointing out the things they personally disliked about the game, then they're a 4chan troll?

I'll agree that the fake bioware employees, the many stanley woo impersonators, and the like are all trolls. But I doubt they're all from 4chan. I've never been to 4chan, but I know that it's not just them. Reddit is also bombing the site, as well as other old school RPG fans that dislike the new action oriented games Bioware has been making.

To simply discredit any post that someone makes that doesn't give the game good to great reviews is a bit silly. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there that dislike the game for legitimate reasons than just "4chan told me it's bad".

[Persephone]

Super.Sid wrote...

Gigamantis wrote...

Super.Sid wrote...

BuffPhantoms wrote...

The majority of the people who have finished the game have not liked it

Proof? And please don't link MC user reviews as proof, since that was proven as raided.

Go and look at the spoiler section if u must.

That doesn't really prove anything.  10-15 people spamming up the spoiler section are hardly proven to be the majority in a game that likely sold millions. 

Its not 10-15 people its a lot more. Besides they are not the same company any more, their ideals have changed.
Accept it now or face huge disappointment later.

Accept it now....or face what now? What is this, a melodramatic soap opera?

Bioware hasn't hugely disappointed me yet and I doubt they'll start with ME3.

[Persephone]

Joy Divison wrote...

Gigamantis wrote...

Yawn, prove that these journalists are being blackmailed or just stop.  Oh, and don't link a blog with some kids theory on the industry. 

Links and explanations have already been provided for you on this topic and it is quite obvious you want to keep you head in the sand.

None of which contain actual PROOF, Joy. Proof that ALL 40++ glowing reviews this game got were bought or blackmailed. And again, at least those are coherent, mostly well structured, in depth and I know they have actually PLAYED the game. Unlike the fanbrats at MC.

[Super.Sid]

Persephone wrote...

Joy Divison wrote...

Gigamantis wrote...

Yawn, prove that these journalists are being blackmailed or just stop.  Oh, and don't link a blog with some kids theory on the industry. 

Links and explanations have already been provided for you on this topic and it is quite obvious you want to keep you head in the sand.

None of which contain actual PROOF, Joy. Proof that ALL 40++ glowing reviews this game got were bought or blackmailed. And again, at least those are coherent, mostly well structured, in depth and I know they have actually PLAYED the game. Unlike the fanbrats at MC.

Please reserve your review till you have finished a full walkthrough of the game.The game is great but some really bad things screw it up.

And I believe this link is not worth enough to be called an honest review.
http://www.pcpowerpl...-mass-effect-3/

Modifié par Super.Sid, 08 mars 2012 - 10:09 .

[Persephone]

Super.Sid wrote...

Persephone wrote...

Joy Divison wrote...

Gigamantis wrote...

Yawn, prove that these journalists are being blackmailed or just stop.  Oh, and don't link a blog with some kids theory on the industry. 

Links and explanations have already been provided for you on this topic and it is quite obvious you want to keep you head in the sand.

None of which contain actual PROOF, Joy. Proof that ALL 40++ glowing reviews this game got were bought or blackmailed. And again, at least those are coherent, mostly well structured, in depth and I know they have actually PLAYED the game. Unlike the fanbrats at MC.

Please reserve your review till you have finished a full walkthrough of the game.The game is great but some really bad things screw it up.

And I believe this link is not worth enough to be called an honest review.
http://www.pcpowerpl...-mass-effect-3/

I never review a game before I have finished the game at least once. Sorry you didn't like all of it. But don't assume that you speak for anyone but yourself.

The review you linked to...I stopped reading it because it contained spoilers. Couldn't care less about it though.