Aliens Crew wrote...
Dass das Ende von ME 3 einfach nur blödsinnig ist, merkt man, wenn man sich diese mal genauer durch den Kopf gehen lässt. Bei Zerstörung ist es meiner Ansicht nach am Deutlichsten zu sehen.
Aus Sicht der Reaper (und ihres Spreches, dem Holokid) ist dieses Ende absoluter Unsinn. Warum sollte Holokid Shepard die Vernichtung der Reaper anbieten? Das ergibt doch überhaupt keinen Sinn. Und wenn Holokid nichts sagen würde, wüsste doch Shepard gar nicht, dass er/sie einfach nur den Bottich dort zerschießen muss, um die Reaper auszumerzen. Also, was soll das?
Die Zerstörung hilft den Reapern nicht bei ihrem angeblichen Problem. Also macht es auch keinen Sinn, Shepard diese Option anzubieten. Und wenn sie auf Suizid stehen, dann könnten sie auch alle ganz einfach in den nächsten Stern fliegen. Mit anderen Worten: Das Ende ist totaler Unfug.
Meiner Ansicht nach ist es nicht tiefsinnig, sondern nur aus Zeitmangel billig zusammgeklatscht worden, um fertig zu werden. Dazu passt auch die Einführung einer Deus Ex Machina.
Nochmal aus Sicht dieser
Theorie: Wenn er nicht Destroy anbietet, glaubt Shepard Starbinger erst recht kein Wort. Es würde sofort Verdacht erregen. Aber er malt die Zukunft sofort schwarz, wenn man Zerstörung wählen würde. s. hier:
Option 1: Destroy the Reapers
"It is now in your power to destroy us".
The Catalyst is not a fool. It is wise to put this option on the table first as it is going to be the first and only thing on Shepard’s mind. In fact, it is the very first inquiry Shepard makes after introductions are made asking, “I need to stop the Reapers. Do you know how I can do that?” The Catalyst knows that it has to tackle the most obvious threat to its continuation before it can even bother to introduce its own suggestions. If it tried to ****foot around the Destroy option it would garner suspicion and its motivations would be immediately brought into question. The Catalyst's only hope is to maintain the illusion of impartiality and otherwise convince Shepard that its options are simply more beneficial. But at the same time it cannot portray Destroy too harshly or it risks appearing biased right from the start. The Catalyst has to play it safe and smart. Although in the throes of an indoctrination attempt, Shepard is not indoctrinated; but he is highly susceptible to suggestion.
It immediately begins to paint a dire picture. The negativity associated with Destroy will form the baseline
for making its upcoming options more palatable. The Catalyst says, "But be warned: others will be destroyed as well. The crucible will not discriminate. All synthetics will be targeted. Even you are partly synthetic.” It further adds, “Technology you rely on will be affected.” Shepard will have to sacrifice his friend, EDI, and his new Geth allies;
Negating his work in securing a peace with the Quarians and discarding the sacrifice of his friend Legion. Shepard has to destroy that which flies in the face of the Catalyst's assertions about organic-synthetic relations.
Oh, and don't forget that "The Chaos" will return. Can't have that, right? Shepard is forced to accept this assertion. However, this is the least of Shepard's trust problems as will be covered in later segments of this thesis. Shepard's lethargic tendency to accept the Catalyst's assertions actually make sense in an indoctrination scenario.
This entire exchange is intended to make Shepard hesitate and second guess his objective. The Catalyst also
notes that Shepard’s body contains synthetic parts to imply that the Crucible will target him as well. It wishes to remove self preservation as a factor in Shepard's decision. Not only that, but it brings into question rather or not the Crucible may hurt or kill multitudes of innocent people who depend on synthetic technology for their
survival. In this way Shepard's decision is weighed solely on the negatives associated with destroying the Reapers verses the apparent lack of negatives (in comparison) associated with the Catalyst's upcoming suggestions.
The Crucible is made out to be the equivalent of a sawed-off shotgun being used to create an incision for
open eye surgery. Now that the Reapers have soured the taste of using the Crucible for its intended purpose they offer their own suggestions. Shepard has not been fully indoctrinated, but he is susceptible to suggestions. Shepard is clearly not all there and the Catalyst is playing on that fact.
---
Shepard ist clever genug selbst herauszufinden, was den Tiegel am Feuern hindert, nämlich das Unterdrückungsgerät rechts, eventuell mit Hilfe von EDI o. a. Wenn Starbinger einfach nichts tut, wird Shepard genau das tun und nur Zerstörung auslösen. In den Strahl hüpfen wird er sicher nicht. --> Schlecht für Reaper.
Modifié par mccool78, 21 août 2012 - 02:21 .
Retour en haut
