109 réponses à ce sujet

[Gowienczyk]

Thatguyky wrote...

I really want a DLC like fallout did, but I can't help but feel that Bioware won't do anything. Honestly though, would it be that hard for them to change the last 5 or 10 minutes of the game? Especially to a happy/rewarding ending. As of now, there is no way in hell I'd pay for anything other than DLC endings. The series and potential side mission DLC's are dead to me because the endings we have now... Thanks Bioware, an epic saga that ruled for 5 years is destroyed in 5 minutes

How about them cut out the game once you hit the "conduit" and do a epilogue comic; similar to the prologue comic they did for 2 (for those who didn't want to play the first game), where "we can have our cake and eat it too" essentially leaving conclusion to our questions and let us move on.

[Exitus0]

I feel there is more of a flaw in the logic of the child rather than how he contacts the Reapers. He said the Reapers are the solution to Chaos because synthetics will always rebel against their creators. If it's something that ALWAYS happens, then it isn't chaos. It happens because it's supposed to happen. Secondly, he himself is a synthetic, so basically he is a massive hypocrite. The game would be ALOT better and make ALOT more sense if they scrapped the Catalyst twist ending and just kept it at "we came, we saw, and we kicked some Reaper ass."

[Cepreus]

Wrex:
Who have wrote this ending?
Shepard:
We find him!
Wrex:
Let make it quick. I want his head!

[movieguyabw]

This whole concept of inevitability doesn't really fit in a game where our "choices matter". We should have options available to us (no matter how hard it may be for us to achieve in game) so that *no one* dies.

Without that, our choices don't seem to matter.

[Xellith]

If I had a hard copy of the game I would take a blowtorch to it.

[wrdnshprd]

Phoras wrote...

DLC? Meh.

If CD Projekt are willing to released enhanced editions of their games (The Witcher 1 & 2) for free to improve on the game based on the fans' criticism, why can't Bioware/EA?

But then again, I think we all more or less have the answer to that question. It's sad.

the problem is, people are willing to pay for it.. just look at the fan feedback thread 'please, please charge me an extra  $10 for a better ending.. take my moneyz!' 

...we only have ourselved to blame.

[Xellith]

Please add the poll in my sig to your sig. Its the most popular poll we have at the moment.

[Neothanos]

We deserve a better ending

[PapVogel]

I really don't get it, I've played all MEs, I've enjoyed them. I also enjoyed ME3, and I love the endings, Bioware has ALWAYS said that mass effect 3 would be THE END of commander Shepard. Instead of accepting bioware's story, and the huge amount of balls it must've taken to do it in the way they did it, you want them to edit so many years of work, just so you guys can get your happy ending?

This, I wont be a part of, I'll happily buy another bioware game, they've given me an immense story, with an end that just says "Shepard is the greatest hero of all times"

[GBGriffin]

A question for those wanting a "better ending" DLC:

How far back should they go in the story to make it work? Should they just redo the entire ending? Parts of it? Where should it begin and end?

[moteh]

If Bioware has it in their power, and of course the will, to craft some more endings or vastly different endings I will be more than happy to play the game dozens of times, buy all the DLC, and buy whatever else they come up with for the series after Shepards story as this game was complete gaming bliss until the little tiny elevator ride up to the Catalyst.

Or you know, just a text DLC telling me something of what happened to friends and loved ones my character had.  I'd gladly pay a few dollars for that even.

Modifié par moteh, 09 mars 2012 - 04:33 .

[lasertank]

PapVogel wrote...

I really don't get it, I've played all MEs, I've enjoyed them. I also enjoyed ME3, and I love the endings, Bioware has ALWAYS said that mass effect 3 would be THE END of commander Shepard. Instead of accepting bioware's story, and the huge amount of balls it must've taken to do it in the way they did it, you want them to edit so many years of work, just so you guys can get your happy ending?

This, I wont be a part of, I'll happily buy another bioware game, they've given me an immense story, with an end that just says "Shepard is the greatest hero of all times"

Again. It's not the dark ending pissed most of us. It's the problematic and illogical plot disappointed us. You really think THE shepherd, who went through the plot of ME1 & 2, would but the crappy talk given by the Catalyst? He just solved the conflict between the Geth and the quarian, and now he would totally get on board with the 3 options? Would that make any sense? The plot revealed its flaws from the very beginning of the battle between the allied fleet and the reaper. The sucking ending is simply a breakint point.

[Adsinjapan]

Xellith wrote...


If I win the lotto there are gonna be some serious changes to that ending.  

the flying spaghetti monster.

That would make a much better ending.

[Gowienczyk]

GBGriffin wrote...

A question for those wanting a "better ending" DLC:

How far back should they go in the story to make it work? Should they just redo the entire ending? Parts of it? Where should it begin and end?

After the conduit; and just throw in a proper ending/epilogue.

[lasertank]

GBGriffin wrote...

A question for those wanting a "better ending" DLC:

How far back should they go in the story to make it work? Should they just redo the entire ending? Parts of it? Where should it begin and end?

In my opinion, the story should be rewritten from the battle between the reaper and the allied fleet. But I don't expect Bioware to do that. They had screwed it and they will not be able to fix it. They had failed most of its fans. There's nothing they can do about it.

[Necroscope]

Absolutely agree OP - the game is great, only the endings sucks enormous dick.

[Militarized]

GBGriffin wrote...

A question for those wanting a "better ending" DLC:

How far back should they go in the story to make it work? Should they just redo the entire ending? Parts of it? Where should it begin and end?

Pretty much everything after anderson and Shep talk, if you get that, should be wiped and redone. 

[SonicAF]

GBGriffin wrote...

A question for those wanting a "better ending" DLC:

How far back should they go in the story to make it work? Should they just redo the entire ending? Parts of it? Where should it begin and end?

 
A good idea is to give us an option to refuse all three options and start "suicide mission" with forces falling to The Reapers if you have not enough EMS up to loosing the war completely. It would be a fair deal.

Modifié par SonicAF, 09 mars 2012 - 04:35 .

[Lurchibald]

Mass Effect has always been touted as being your Shepards story shaped how you want by your decisions , therefore, I am going to write up my own ending and that ending is going to be My Shepards "Canon" ending... To hell with biowares endings, I mean, they okayed Mass Effect: Deception after all. (though the push to get better endings may work considering it worked for the book) 

And on a last note isn't the destruction of a Mass Relay meant to release a powerful explosion as evidenced by the Arrival DLC? (yes, I do realise the different modes of destruction, however, that should have no bearing on the amount of power released from being destroyed)

Modifié par Lurchibald, 09 mars 2012 - 04:37 .

[Prince Keldar]

GBGriffin wrote...

A question for those wanting a "better ending" DLC:

How far back should they go in the story to make it work? Should they just redo the entire ending? Parts of it? Where should it begin and end?

Well since Shep made peace between the geth and quarians at least give us a fourth option something a little more conventional would be nice, something similar to Independence Day would cool, not necissarily a computer virus but do something that could weaken the Reapers and make them vulnerable to the Alliance Fleet, or I should say the united galactic fleet, so that we can get all of the races, that we have helped, together and defeat the Reapers and the Galaxy could then enter into a possible Golden Age or something.

Don't get me wrong, I know there are millions or billions dead and that a lot of rebuilding is going to be needed, and there are countless numbers of beings suffering and thats ok with the ending.  What I am talking about by "Golden Age" is that the entire galaxy has come together and they have worked together so all races will work to rebuild together, that by the way includes Shep, LI, and Normandy Crew.

I am just saying don't get rid of the endings, but just give us a DLC where it is possible to have a more conventional victory over the reapers while still preserving a largly connected Galactic community.

Modifié par Prince Keldar, 09 mars 2012 - 04:43 .

[n3koshi]

movieguyabw wrote...

This whole concept of inevitability doesn't really fit in a game where our "choices matter". We should have options available to us (no matter how hard it may be for us to achieve in game) so that *no one* dies.

Without that, our choices don't seem to matter.

Wait... didn't Shep say something like that to Catalyst?

[lastpatriot]

It's sad because the end of ME:2 was outstanding and the most fun/excited I've ever been while playing a game. It was truly epic! ME:3 was terrible! I almost wish I never played the series.

[Eyjh]

Released today in Europe, I think we'll have a few more supporters to the cause soon enough.

[Hyrist]

As far as the question of "How far back."

I'd say the end of the Harbinger fight, where he starts kicking everyone's but no matter what - give us an ending that allows Shepard to reach the Catalyst without taking a lazer to the face, so that his physical condition is good enough to survive the ending choices regardless of which one, and, that in surviving/beating Harbinger Normandy sticks around.

[Da Don Giovanni]

n3koshi wrote...

movieguyabw wrote...

This whole concept of inevitability doesn't really fit in a game where our "choices matter". We should have options available to us (no matter how hard it may be for us to achieve in game) so that *no one* dies.

Without that, our choices don't seem to matter.

Wait... didn't Shep say something like that to Catalyst?

The paragon response, yes.