35 réponses à ce sujet

[chris fenton]

 I didn't see one. I see people spread about complaining about the endings, but can we make one thread where all the complaints can be read? 
The game pre ending, 9.5

Post ending, a tops of 6. The whole series feels pointless, massive plot holes. A very disappointing ending to such a great story and series, I really hope you take your fans' opinions to your hearts, Bioware.
I admit, I want a lighter ending. But I also want less plot holes, less questions.
This was supposed to be a conclusion, not 100 questions.

Please, Bioware. 

EDIT: I should mention that I don't even need some new scene with all the VA's, all that ****. A text story explaining what happened, and a simple cinematic with Shepard with his crew, or how ever you change it.
And make it free!
I refuse to believe I should have to pay for something that should have been in the game according to thousands of people ... TWICE! Please, I trust you Bioware. Have been playing since BG

Modifié par chris fenton, 09 mars 2012 - 01:48 .

[Kronner]

I support removing/fixing the Normandy crash scene. Other than that, the endings are perfect IMHO.

[P_sutherland]

replace the stupid kid with Harbinger.

[Jack_Forest]

I can live with the RGB choice, but Normandy thing is rediculous, completely out of nowhere and without ANY explanation.

[DraCZeQQ]

Normandy thing doesnt make sense ...
Sheppard deserve his/her happily ever after with his/her LI trying to rebuild galaxy they saved ...

[chris fenton]

Bump, there are a lot of people with complaints, including you Dwake. (obscure joke off)

[Thormgrim]

*Support* Yep I want to save the galaxy not doom it to hell by saving is Oo ( which is exactly what you do, its even worse as when the reapers hadn't been stopped , on my opinion )

[JadeEffect]

P_sutherland wrote...

replace the stupid kid with Harbinger.

I don't think you realize the important of the kid... 

[JadeEffect]

Thormgrim wrote...

*Support* Yep I want to save the galaxy not doom it to hell by saving is Oo ( which is exactly what you do, its even worse as when the reapers hadn't been stopped , on my opinion )

You do save the galaxy, you either destroy the reapers and all of the reaper tech (citadel, relays), you either control the reapers, or convert the DNA of everyone to a highest level of evolution.

[Mmw04014]

Normandy stays in the Sol system or crashes on earth.

If they just did that, I would still have problems with the endings, but I wouldn't feel so hopeless about the series (or Bioware), because it would be easy to extrapolate that Shepard would able to get back to Earth. The galaxy would still be screwed over but at least Shepard could be with the people he/she cares about.

[Taleroth]

JadeEffect wrote...

I don't think you realize the important of the kid... 

I realize his importance. That's a part of the problem.

[Computron2000]

No problems on dying. It comes with the job. But at least make a better ending showing what happened to everyone. This is incredibly important as Bioware should already know. People love different characters and when their fave characters for 2 to 3 episodes (other than James) are left hanging in limbo with no real idea what happened to them other than that silly adam/eve look ending, thats a suck endng.

And it makes no sense for Joker to be caught in a backlash from the relay destruction because he should not be jumping at all. Its the Alliance homeworld and a do or die mission. No surrender, no retreat.

And if i remember correctly, the Normandy doesn't even need to use the relay as it can do a jump straight from space ala the ME2 Joker defense mission

Modifié par Computron2000, 09 mars 2012 - 03:21 .

[rishnarr]

My big issue with the endings is that they are based on this synthetic vs organic conflict which hasn't really been present in any of the games before hand. Yes the reapers are synthetic, but so are the geth. With the geth from ME2 on they have made a very big point of portraying them as positively as possible. They didn't start the war, they didn't wipe out the quarians when they had the chance, and they are willing to help the quarians rebuild. And the AI on Luna you fight in the first game could only be acting in self defense, since when it becomes EDI it's rather nice and polite.

As far as explaining the reapers, I think that was a mistake. I much prefer the, "they are alien and unknowable" explanation in the end of the first one. But if they did it could have been something simple about wiping out advanced galactic life before they destroy each other completely and take everyone with them. IF they did that they could have made something about using the rachni as a test.

I also think the mechanic of the RGB ending choice was a bad idea. If I've been making all these choices throughout the game then why not have the game pick one of those based on me decisions, so that I at least feel like they mattered a bit. Cause right now they don't, i just each to reload a save and pick another one.

As far as the sad happy ending debate i think whether or not the end was good or bad should be tied into how you play the game. So if things were looking bleak then you get a bleak ending, but if you had a high readiness level, and didn't have to lose any of the groups in the decision process then you get a good ending. So that way the people wanting the bad one get one and the guys wanting a good one get the good one, which makes sense for a game about player choice.

That sums up my complaints.

[chris fenton]

Bumppiin!

[fearan1]

There is a massive 15000 post about endings in the other spoilers section no worries though Bioware is ignoring that one to.

Modifié par fearan1, 09 mars 2012 - 04:34 .

[sergeym1990]

fearan1 wrote...

There is a massive 15000 post about endings in the other spoilers section no worries though Bioware is ignoring that one to.

I think it is a bit early to accuse BioWare of ignoring ending rage. After all, only few days have passed since game release, I think they will issue some statement about this soon.

Modifié par sergeym1990, 09 mars 2012 - 04:43 .

[Arokel]

I am okay with the current endings but would support a new ending dlc provided it was $2.50 or less.

[Arokel]

sergeym1990 wrote...

fearan1 wrote...

There is a massive 15000 post about endings in the other spoilers section no worries though Bioware is ignoring that one to.

I think it is a bit early to accuse BioWare of ignoring ending rage. After all, only few days have passed since game release, I think they will issue some statement about this soon.

You have to remember that any statement they make has to be approved by probably a dozen or more people

[Arokel]

P_sutherland wrote...

replace the stupid kid with Harbinger.

I actually didn't mind the kid.  I though he was an interesting way of showing Shepard's fears.  But it would be cool if Harby showed up.

"You feel this Shepard":huh:


Edit: Sorry for three comments in a row.  Didn't realize they were the same thread.  (im not awake)

Modifié par Arokel, 09 mars 2012 - 04:48 .

[Dranume]

If My Commander Sheppard, he would support this thread. Yes different endings that resemble and embody a greater amount of hope then the current ones.

and I agree, the Normandy running away makes no sense with out a explanation that is plausible.

[Rhayth]

If I wanted Dues Ex endings...i'd F'N play Dues Ex...for those of you who say it's perfect are ridiculous. It is almost exactly Dues Ex...ya know without having to play 3 fulls games to get to them.

Not happy right now with Bioware...love Bioware SPENT TONS O' MONEY but I am not happy.

[Bellendaine]

I heartily, heartily, heartily endorse a more tasteful ending, reflecting that yes, Shepard, you can make a difference. Things aren't going to be easy, sacrifices made, but there is a chance that galactic civilization isn't boned no matter what choices you made ... you know, what they promised us originally when they said "our choices matter." Right now, all our choices mean is that the great evil wins regardless ...

Modifié par Bellendaine, 09 mars 2012 - 04:51 .

[HighScore 2600]

 The ending should have
left me with the feeling of accomplishment. It did not. No action that was made
in the previous games or even your choices in ME3 mattered or made a difference
that was significant enough to have a closure for the player, and sense of accomplishment
or victory over the Reapers was not granted. Destroying the Relays killed
millions, the Galactic community is in shambles, and all Council leadership is
scattered. The Galaxy is now forever in chaos, in my opinion: The War was lost.  

[Lugaidster]

Just 2 points.

1) Why o why did the normandy crash.
2) Why does reaper destruction have to involve the Geth and EDI? I already proved him wrong! That's the closest to a perfect ending we'll ever get? Shep lives in rubble and the normandy crashes who knows where with my LI and all squadies? Not to mention that Joker will hate me forever for killing EDI... And I went through the trouble of saving the Geth to kill them with the reaper... What a load of bull...

[Lyrandori]

I do not support "new" endings, but I support "MORE" endings. I just wanted to see more options near and at the end that would result in ONE out of... dunno... maybe 4 or 5 endings? Something like that. For now we have three... well, barely, more like two and it's pretty much all gray and depressing whichever way you go.