Ce sujet est fermé
njfluffy19 wrote...
And this is why turians are epicly awesome.
It isn't, you see this effect also in your dreams, but that doesn't prove a thing about indoctrination.leewells wrote...
PLEASE ADD TO THE OP:
This is the definite nail that solidifies the theory into a fact: The post-processing shader at the end. Take a look, I call it the glaucoma effect because the corners of the screen are darkened (black) is only used in one other type of scene -- your dreams with the boy. This appears to be very conclusive that this is no longer a theory -- it is fact.
With crap like that, no wonder the thread is impossible to follow.
Modifié par Dendio1, 03 avril 2012 - 05:32 .
Check the object name.Rksmithers wrote...
Silasqtx wrote...
http://i.imgur.com/1PpZ2.png
.
i dont understand... what am i looking at?
Silasqtx wrote...
http://i.imgur.com/1PpZ2.png
.
Modifié par Flapperrr, 03 avril 2012 - 05:32 .
CheesieOnion wrote...
It isn't, you see this effect also in your dreams, but that doesn't prove a thing about indoctrination.leewells wrote...
PLEASE ADD TO THE OP:
This is the definite nail that solidifies the theory into a fact: The post-processing shader at the end. Take a look, I call it the glaucoma effect because the corners of the screen are darkened (black) is only used in one other type of scene -- your dreams with the boy. This appears to be very conclusive that this is no longer a theory -- it is fact.
legaldinho wrote...
CheesieOnion wrote...
Can someone confirm this? Maybe this is another troll trying to be funny.Silasqtx wrote...
http://i.imgur.com/1PpZ2.png
.
This was around like 400 pages ago, and every time it's posted the same questions follow. No it's not a fake, yes it's been verified by posters before downloading the software that trawls through these files. No, it doesn't prove the end sequence is a dream.
I mean, it's almost as if, in this thread, there is a cycle that inevitably will repeat itself. Where have I heard this dren before?
Dendio1 wrote...
With crap like that, no wonder the thread is impossible to follow.
Discuss the image and its message or the discussion at hand and stop trolling
Stop worrying about me and get back to the topic at hand.So how about you heed your own advice? Discuss or leave. Want my advice? Read the thread.
Modifié par Dendio1, 03 avril 2012 - 05:37 .
leewells wrote...
CheesieOnion wrote...
It isn't, you see this effect also in your dreams, but that doesn't prove a thing about indoctrination.leewells wrote...
PLEASE ADD TO THE OP:
This is the definite nail that solidifies the theory into a fact: The post-processing shader at the end. Take a look, I call it the glaucoma effect because the corners of the screen are darkened (black) is only used in one other type of scene -- your dreams with the boy. This appears to be very conclusive that this is no longer a theory -- it is fact.
It proves that the devs conveyed the entire ending as a dream state.
Rifneno wrote...
To be fair, krogans were helping. But yeah. Just epic. One of the best parts about multiplayer is that you can play other races. It's great to be able to play as these awesome races.
LOL at my being asked for proof when I say a would-be smoking gun for IT isn't what it looks like after 900 pages of heavily supporting IT. Why would I lie about that?! Wee.
Rksmithers: http://twitter.com/#...491796659437568
He collects dust on my selection screen.
Nice! well That proves a little lot....CheesieOnion wrote...
Check the object name.Rksmithers wrote...
Silasqtx wrote...
http://i.imgur.com/1PpZ2.png
.
i dont understand... what am i looking at?
Modifié par Rksmithers, 03 avril 2012 - 05:36 .
Rksmithers wrote...
legaldinho wrote...
CheesieOnion wrote...
Can someone confirm this? Maybe this is another troll trying to be funny.Silasqtx wrote...
http://i.imgur.com/1PpZ2.png
.
This was around like 400 pages ago, and every time it's posted the same questions follow. No it's not a fake, yes it's been verified by posters before downloading the software that trawls through these files. No, it doesn't prove the end sequence is a dream.
I mean, it's almost as if, in this thread, there is a cycle that inevitably will repeat itself. Where have I heard this dren before?
HAHAHAHA FARSCAPE!!!!!
CheesieOnion wrote...
It isn't, you see this effect also in your dreams, but that doesn't prove a thing about indoctrination.leewells wrote...
PLEASE ADD TO THE OP:
This is the definite nail that solidifies the theory into a fact: The post-processing shader at the end. Take a look, I call it the glaucoma effect because the corners of the screen are darkened (black) is only used in one other type of scene -- your dreams with the boy. This appears to be very conclusive that this is no longer a theory -- it is fact.
I checked it and you don't see the effect anymore when you enter the Citadel and the effect you mention looks a lot different than what you see in the dreams.leewells wrote...
CheesieOnion wrote...
It isn't, you see this effect also in your dreams, but that doesn't prove a thing about indoctrination.leewells wrote...
PLEASE ADD TO THE OP:
This is the definite nail that solidifies the theory into a fact: The post-processing shader at the end. Take a look, I call it the glaucoma effect because the corners of the screen are darkened (black) is only used in one other type of scene -- your dreams with the boy. This appears to be very conclusive that this is no longer a theory -- it is fact.
It proves that the devs conveyed the entire ending as a dream state.
legaldinho wrote...
Rksmithers wrote...
legaldinho wrote...
CheesieOnion wrote...
Can someone confirm this? Maybe this is another troll trying to be funny.Silasqtx wrote...
http://i.imgur.com/1PpZ2.png
.
This was around like 400 pages ago, and every time it's posted the same questions follow. No it's not a fake, yes it's been verified by posters before downloading the software that trawls through these files. No, it doesn't prove the end sequence is a dream.
I mean, it's almost as if, in this thread, there is a cycle that inevitably will repeat itself. Where have I heard this dren before?
HAHAHAHA FARSCAPE!!!!!
I've just speed-watched through all of series 2 to 4... on youtube! amazing. Skipping the filler episodes. Tell you what, the Mass Effect writers certainly liked their Farscape.
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CHARACTERS.
JC and Dargo = Shep and Garrus. Dargo still wins.
Purple People Eater wrote...
Indoctrination Theory is at 98% certainty for me. Everyday I read something else that just makes me feel stronger about it.
Modifié par Dendio1, 03 avril 2012 - 05:39 .
I SAID DARGO WINS YOU TRELKRksmithers wrote...
legaldinho wrote...
I've
just speed-watched through all of series 2 to 4... on youtube! amazing.
Skipping the filler episodes. Tell you what, the Mass Effect writers
certainly liked their Farscape.
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CHARACTERS.
JC and Dargo = Shep and Garrus. Dargo still wins.
id say they are equal and pretty damn much the same people.... personality wise, garrus just needs a quolta blade.
Modifié par legaldinho, 03 avril 2012 - 05:41 .
Dendio1 wrote...
Purple People Eater wrote...
Indoctrination Theory is at 98% certainty for me. Everyday I read something else that just makes me feel stronger about it.
At this point it feels like IT or bust. Bioware has themselves to blame for letting it get to this. They could have nipped it in the bud earlier on with a single post. The fact that they have not denied it has let it grow into something that even major publications have taken seriously.
Retour en haut
