llbountyhunter wrote...
LOL that's awesome!
llbountyhunter wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
Fhaarkas wrote...
The sequence with Starchild was the "encounter with god" moment for the game, the final test/fight. And what can logically follow for me is only a conclusion (or in this case a clarification) and not further conflicts or boss fights. To do otherwise would be to take away the significance of that final sequence.
I agree with most of what you said, but I very strongly disagree with this. To do otherwise would take away the significance of the "encounter with god" moment? Just the opposite. To leave it as an "encounter with god" moment would take away from the entire rest of the series. There's been some references in naming, but religion itself has never been a major part, or even a minor part of Mass Effect. There's some Christian symbolism in it, yeah. There's also some Greek mythology symbolism. Why not have ****ing Zeus and Hera pop out at the end while we're at it?
Incorporating truly powerful deities into stories like this is nearly impossible. Either they're the villain and you wind up with the "final boss is god" trope that's been beaten into the ground, mostly by jRPGs... or you have a non-evil deity that could fix everything by twitching his nose like Elizabeth Montgomery but isn't going to. For some reason. And the third option, the one we have used here: the worst of both worlds. An evil deity that isn't even dealt with. It's just a terrible idea all-round.
Modifié par Fhaarkas, 06 avril 2012 - 06:15 .
Suparaddy wrote...
Modifié par savagejuicebox, 06 avril 2012 - 06:12 .
savagejuicebox wrote...
Suparaddy wrote...
Comparing us to N@zis, how classy of you. <_<
jules_vern18 wrote...
savagejuicebox wrote...
Suparaddy wrote...
Comparing us to N@zis, how classy of you. <_<
fanatical groupthink is fanatical groupthink.
Modifié par savagejuicebox, 06 avril 2012 - 06:18 .
savagejuicebox wrote...
Suparaddy wrote...
Comparing us to N@zis, how classy of you. <_<
Suparaddy wrote...
savagejuicebox wrote...
Suparaddy wrote...
Comparing us to N@zis, how classy of you. <_<
Comparing the reapers to ****'s actually....
savagejuicebox wrote...
Suparaddy wrote...
savagejuicebox wrote...
Suparaddy wrote...
Comparing us to N@zis, how classy of you. <_<
Comparing the reapers to ****'s actually....
Mhmm...then why say anything about it being a theory?
Fhaarkas wrote...
That second part was actually added later so it's kinda like an afterthought, sorry. I didn't mean that Starchild is a "god entity" suddenly introduced in the game. Far from it.
In Indoctrination Theory, Starchild is stated to be an illusion created by Harbinger/the Reapers and that final encounter is their final attempt to defeat Shepard's will. There can be a myriad of reasons why they couldn't have just killed him instead of trying to turn him over and over (test of worthiness, too impressed, keep him later for something etc) but that's another topic.
The important thing is, the encounter is the moment of truth for Shepard (and more importantly US), and that's the significance that I meant. For Indoctrination Theory, this encounter is the apex of the whole story. What happens next should be just some snowballing effect resulting from this, which is why a 'lost chapter' doesn't make much sense to me, comparatively.
On the other hand, if the ending is to be taken on face value, I totally agree that Starchild did nothing but destroy everything established. No sense can be made whatsoever for his existence. He's been there all along in the Citadel? What?
I think the ending was supposed to invoke these questions, without compromising its integrity (aka what Hudson and Walters tried to do, allegedly) -
Shepard - did the final sequence really happen or was he hallucinating/in limbo/mind-trapped?
Starchild - was he really the creator of Reapers or just a projection?
Final scene (destruction/victory and closure for characters) - did it all happen or was it Shepard's vision of what he thought would've happened (fate of the crew would remain unknown)?
Breath - was it on Citadel or Earth?
Crucible - was it a weapon or something else entirely?
Well, the questions are invoked alright but the believability and integrity of one possibility was thrown out of the window. I think we all know which one.
Suparaddy wrote...
savagejuicebox wrote...
Suparaddy wrote...
savagejuicebox wrote...
Suparaddy wrote...
Comparing us to N@zis, how classy of you. <_<
Comparing the reapers to ****'s actually....
Mhmm...then why say anything about it being a theory?
Because it's not a theory, it's proven fact. RE: SS squads, Himler, and Goebbels(spelling?)
kilgorek wrote...
Only problem is, one of the great hopes of the IT was that Bioware would be continuing the story from where Shepard wakes up. This "Extended Cut" pretty much confirms that this will not be the case. Unless of course they are planning an ME 4. But I can't imagine that could make up an entire game.
I for one am will to give you the benefit of the doubt. BUT, I your American, like me, you need to understand that this thread is international and the whole N*** thing is a sensitive issue. Good point about the ice cream sandwitch, In fact that might even have more merit, at least from a comedy perspective.Suparaddy wrote...
In all seriousness though, the people who stood by the IT shouldn't have to apologize for anything. The endings, being ambiguous and open to WAY too much speculation, didn't offer any concrete evidence to refute the theory, so IT supporters were free to think what they wanted to.
Just like I could've said Shep bit down on an Ice cream sandwich and was magically teleported to Hogwarts where he aided in the final battle against Voldemort before Hermione apparated him back to Gilligan's Planet. Is there any evidence to the contrary at this point? No, therefore I can consider this canon until Bioware clarifies what happened.
I love you man/woman. But I have a hard enough time keeping up when everything is in english.:happy:lex0r11 wrote...
Huh? What the hell happened here? The ****s are back?
Ach du meine Guete!
Modifié par Big G13, 06 avril 2012 - 06:56 .
Modifié par waldstr18, 06 avril 2012 - 06:57 .
Suparaddy wrote...
In all seriousness though, the people who stood by the IT shouldn't have to apologize for anything. The endings, being ambiguous and open to WAY too much speculation, didn't offer any concrete evidence to refute the theory, so IT supporters were free to think what they wanted to.
Just like I could've said Shep bit down on an Ice cream sandwich and was magically teleported to Hogwarts where he aided in the final battle against Voldemort before Hermione apparated him back to Gilligan's Planet. Is there any evidence to the contrary at this point? No, therefore I can consider this canon until Bioware clarifies what happened.
Modifié par JustAidan, 06 avril 2012 - 07:03 .
Big G13 wrote...
I love you man/woman. But I have a hard enough time keeping up when everything is in english.:happy:lex0r11 wrote...
Huh? What the hell happened here? The ****s are back?
Ach du meine Guete!
Modifié par lex0r11, 06 avril 2012 - 07:07 .
I was kidding. And as long you translate you can do it all you want. Maybe I'll learn something. Not making any promises, but maybe.lex0r11 wrote...
Big G13 wrote...
I love you man/woman. But I have a hard enough time keeping up when everything is in english.:happy:lex0r11 wrote...
Huh? What the hell happened here? The ****s are back?
Ach du meine Guete!
"Ach du meine Guete!" just means "Dear me!" or anything with a "Goodness!" in it.
Never meant to cause cunfusion.