Was the ending a hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory
#31876
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:41
#31877
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:41
I don't understand why they would not just say it isn't true if, in fact, it isn't. People are saying the reason is so us IT believers buy the DLC, but the DLC is free! And yes, eventually there will be DLC that we have to purchase, but by then we would have all watched the clarification DLC and realized IT is or is not true.
Doesn't make sense.
Edit: spelling
Modifié par CruddierCashew, 06 avril 2012 - 09:41 .
#31878
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:41
#31879
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:41
#31880
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:41
I have fought for IT since release. fought hard...
But we have to open our eyes. hope doesn't matter anymore, there is not chance it will be included. certainly not in the way we wanted it to be included. Dont give the opposition more fuel. lets let it go.
#31881
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:41
Thoughts? I honestly think what they are doing is genius if im right.
#31882
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:42
byne wrote...
40% of the PAX audience didnt let Garrus win the bottle shooting competition?
PAX is full of horrible human beings!
^
#31883
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:42
#31884
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:42
byne wrote...
40% of the PAX audience didnt let Garrus win the bottle shooting competition?
PAX is full of horrible human beings!
Lol, thinking the same thing
#31885
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:42
Flash_Death wrote...
lex0r11 wrote...
Giving up?
Please, you guys know what i've been doing here for 1000 pages.
Convinced me to stay until they offically debunk it.
Even if it is just one, it's worth it.
#31886
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:43
Check out that "um"
#31887
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:43
#31888
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:43
#31889
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:44
#31890
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:44
#31891
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:45
lex0r11 wrote...
Flash_Death wrote...
lex0r11 wrote...
Giving up?
Please, you guys know what i've been doing here for 1000 pages.
Convinced me to stay until they offically debunk it.
Even if it is just one, it's worth it.
Oh, there's more than one of us who will hold the line. Didn't you see my rallying cry earlier? We're not giving up that easily.
#31892
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:45
Domanese wrote...
I didn't miss the shot. Infiltrators do not intentionally miss.
This. Unfortunately because of that I initially missed the best line in the game.
#31893
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:45
#31894
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:45
Domanese wrote...
I didn't miss the shot. Infiltrators do not intentionally miss.
Not in a real combat situation, no, but to make a good friend happy? Yes. Yes they do.
Even the most hardened rengade should know that.
#31895
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:45
Chief Commander wrote...
Video of BW answer to the IT
http://yfrog.com/0jm0vdzyfrog.com/0jm0vdz
(Turn up your volume)
I heard that 'um'. He's being suspiciously picky with his words.
#31896
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:46
#31897
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:46
---maybe well get more
#31898
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:46
#31899
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:46
IronSabbath88 wrote...
Exactly.
They won't flat out deny it. They dodged the question QUICK. "um" is a silly thing to debunk the theory with.
When asked about IT, the reply was: "Um, IT shows how 'committed' our fans are...."
"I don't want to be perscriptive...."
That implies the "perscription" would be to tell those committed fans that they're wrong, which you clearly don't want to do in that position.
But this isn't the answer you give if IT is actually planned/incorporated.....seriously folks? If IT was planned and incorporated, you think that the answer would have been phrased that way?
"It was created by our fans and we don't want to tell them what to think so I'll shut up now" is the opposite of validation.
I still believe in IT because it would make for a killer ending, and makes far, far more sense than the one we were provided, but it's pretty clearly not the one they were/are planning.
Let's be careful not to actually give opponents of IT the satisfaction of seeing us actually "grasp at straws."
#31900
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 09:46
slyko227 wrote...
video (i think) that includes the "um" http://yfrog.com/0jm0vdz
Hmm, he says a little more than what the blog says (of course they're just paraphrasing)




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





