57139 réponses à ce sujet

[Ms_Alison_Gunn]

schneeland wrote...

Kyzee wrote...

Big G13 wrote...

IronSabbath88 wrote...

There was some war started over a comment BioWare made on the indoc theory at PAX yesterday... a very vague comment. People got up in arms over the term "um" being a sign of the theory being debunked.

And because they called us "committed"

They started trolling over ... um... ? And say they our evidence is thin. Holy plot Batman, thats crazy. We're committed. They're committable.

Yeah, about that . . . I heard that there was a question of whether it was "um" or "again." Was that ever clarified? Did any audio recordings show up?

It was both, actually ... I saw a Youtube recording where I understood "shows again how, um, commited our fanbase is".

I think it's so funny that people would actually go and debate over the word "um". There is very little to nothing to be proven or drawn from that tiny syllbale. lol 

Modifié par Ms_Alison_Gunn, 07 avril 2012 - 04:17 .

[IronSabbath88]

Stumpykins wrote...

So its true then, the indoc theory is untrue. thats a shame.
just found this article http://gamerant.com/...ct-3-jw-142249/
says that the dlc will not change the ending or be a re-imagining, if its not a re-imagining then its not the indoc theory

Changing the ending would be doing away with the ending completley.

Re-imagining would be changing little things about the ending but keeping it intact.

They aren't doing either. They're explaining and expanding on the current ending. Which is to say if it didn't really happen, then that needs to be clarified.

[blooregard]

Skillz1986 wrote...

My thought was that he just didn't want to say "how observant our fanbase is"...that would have completely given everything away. so he gave it a thought. Hence, the "um"

Yeah I always figure when somebody avoids a yes or no question the way they did it usually indicates that its a yes.


After all has anyone noticed that bioware has most  of everyone else thought they'd do with the ending from teh 4th option to the "rescue" DLCs yet they haven't once talked in detail about the indoctrination theory

[Big G13]

IronSabbath88 wrote...

Calling us commited could be praising us without actually saying so for all we know.

Being committed is a good thing. I am committed to my girlfriend, I am committed to my football team, I am committed to my career. " It just shows again how .. um .. committed our fan base is." etc. etc.

[Kyzee]

schneeland wrote...

Kyzee wrote...

Big G13 wrote...

IronSabbath88 wrote...

There was some war started over a comment BioWare made on the indoc theory at PAX yesterday... a very vague comment. People got up in arms over the term "um" being a sign of the theory being debunked.

And because they called us "committed"

They started trolling over ... um... ? And say they our evidence is thin. Holy plot Batman, thats crazy. We're committed. They're committable.

Yeah, about that . . . I heard that there was a question of whether it was "um" or "again." Was that ever clarified? Did any audio recordings show up?

It was both, actually ... I saw a Youtube recording where I understood "shows again how, um, commited our fanbase is".

"Tell me why I had to be a powerslaaaaave!"

::ahem:: Yes, well . . . thanks for the info. 

[lex0r11]

Don't worry guys, Shepard will warn us when the next attack is about to happen.

Modifié par lex0r11, 07 avril 2012 - 04:22 .

[Big Bad]

Wasn't there another Bioware announcement scheduled for this morning at PAX? Anybody know what it was about?

[Falloutwarfare]

@IronSabbath88 If we dont make any sudden movements and keep the troll feed in the bag then the troll will just move on to another thread...... Their creatures that require recognition so give it none.

Modifié par Falloutwarfare, 07 avril 2012 - 04:36 .

[UrgedDuke]

do you guys think that the DLC will be any good

[balance5050]

blooregard wrote...

Say did they ever blatently come out and say that "The Truth" DLC was false? I know they did that for "Terminator" and "Mass Shift" but did they ever say that about "The Truth"?

All they said was "Do you think we would actually call it "the truth"? Never acually said anything more abuot it other then the name.

[Byakuren2009]

IT is not reimagining or changing the actual endings, it explains them and extends them

[Arashi08]

blooregard wrote...

Say did they ever blatently come out and say that "The Truth" DLC was false? I know they did that for "Terminator" and "Mass Shift" but did they ever say that about "The Truth"?

Funny story,  I was playing MP with a guy from AU and he mentioned the Truth DLC as well as the Resurgence pack.  he even told me about the Geth, Batarian, and Krogan Battlemaster characters you can play as.  And keep in mind this was mere days after the games release.  I'd say a week at best.  If he knew about the Resurgence pack and "The Truth" DLC and one of them turned out to be correct, does that at least leave hope for the other?

[DirtyPhoenix]

balance5050 wrote...

blooregard wrote...

Say did they ever blatently come out and say that "The Truth" DLC was false? I know they did that for "Terminator" and "Mass Shift" but did they ever say that about "The Truth"?

All they said was "Do you think we would actually call it "the truth"? Never acually said anything more abuot it other then the name.

What are "terminator" and "Mass Shift" ? Similar rumoured DLCs?

[balance5050]

pirate1802 wrote...

balance5050 wrote...

blooregard wrote...

Say did they ever blatently come out and say that "The Truth" DLC was false? I know they did that for "Terminator" and "Mass Shift" but did they ever say that about "The Truth"?

All they said was "Do you think we would actually call it "the truth"? Never acually said anything more abuot it other then the name.

What are "terminator" and "Mass Shift" ? Similar rumoured DLCs?

Complete rubbish, the biggest give away was "Hanar and Elcor squadmates" Somethingthat Bioware wouldn't attempt because those characters would be to hard to animate.

[UrgedDuke]

The Hanar would be OP anyway since it can quadruple wield weapons

Modifié par UrgedDuke, 07 avril 2012 - 04:35 .

[Jadebaby]

pirate1802 wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

AND O M G I WANT THAT HAIRCUT!!

Thats the Diana Allers haircut if I'm right, you can mod it

how?

Download the ME3 savegame editor:
http://social.biowar...index/9996307/1

And put in this in the hair mesh:
HairMesh: BIOG_HMF_HIR_PRO.Hair_PROJessica.HMF_HIR_PROJessica_MDL
HAIR_Diff: biog_hmf_hir_pro.Global.HAIR_Long_Diff

Sorry for the late reply, I was searching for the link :/

yea I really wish I knew more about computers...

[balance5050]

UrgedDuke wrote...

The Hanar would be OP anyway since it can quadruple wield weapons

The Elcor would use only the heavy weeapons from ME2

[Jadebaby]

Byakuren2009 wrote...

IT is not reimagining or changing the actual endings, it explains them and extends them

I support this post ^ =)

[lex0r11]

UrgedDuke wrote...

The Hanar would be OP anyway since it can quadruple wield weapons

No need to quadruple wield.

[Either.Ardrey]

blooregard wrote...

Say did they ever blatently come out and say that "The Truth" DLC was false? I know they did that for "Terminator" and "Mass Shift" but did they ever say that about "The Truth"?

Not  really. When asked about "the Truth" a while back, they replied along the lines of, "Do you really think we'd name something that corny?"


Edit: Ninja'd by a pirate:o

Modifié par Either.Ardrey, 07 avril 2012 - 04:40 .

[DirtyPhoenix]

Actually in that mission where you have to rescue some Elcor people I was excited to see how their soldiers look like, but it turned out to be a stupid probe mission >_<

[Stumpykins]

IronSabbath88 wrote...

Stumpykins wrote...

So its true then, the indoc theory is untrue. thats a shame.
just found this article http://gamerant.com/...ct-3-jw-142249/
says that the dlc will not change the ending or be a re-imagining, if its not a re-imagining then its not the indoc theory

Changing the ending would be doing away with the ending completley.

Re-imagining would be changing little things about the ending but keeping it intact.

They aren't doing either. They're explaining and expanding on the current ending. Which is to say if it didn't really happen, then that needs to be clarified.

interesting, so it could still be true. Well thats good,
although if theres no new gamplay element, wont that make it hard for the indoc theory to be true,
without it we'll kust be watching shep kick butt, thats a bit naff, but better than what we have at the moment

[UrgedDuke]

I think it would be A LOT harder to explain the literal ending than it would be to incorporate the IT ... if they weren't already in the process of doing so *fingers crossed*

Modifié par UrgedDuke, 07 avril 2012 - 04:48 .

[Big G13]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

AND O M G I WANT THAT HAIRCUT!!

Thats the Diana Allers haircut if I'm right, you can mod it

how?

Download the ME3 savegame editor:
http://social.biowar...index/9996307/1

And put in this in the hair mesh:
HairMesh: BIOG_HMF_HIR_PRO.Hair_PROJessica.HMF_HIR_PROJessica_MDL
HAIR_Diff: biog_hmf_hir_pro.Global.HAIR_Long_Diff

Sorry for the late reply, I was searching for the link :/

yea I really wish I knew more about computers...

lol. you were gone a while. I'm sure you gave it your all.

[IronSabbath88]

Kyzee wrote...

schneeland wrote...

Kyzee wrote...

Big G13 wrote...

IronSabbath88 wrote...

There was some war started over a comment BioWare made on the indoc theory at PAX yesterday... a very vague comment. People got up in arms over the term "um" being a sign of the theory being debunked.

And because they called us "committed"

They started trolling over ... um... ? And say they our evidence is thin. Holy plot Batman, thats crazy. We're committed. They're committable.

Yeah, about that . . . I heard that there was a question of whether it was "um" or "again." Was that ever clarified? Did any audio recordings show up?

It was both, actually ... I saw a Youtube recording where I understood "shows again how, um, commited our fanbase is".

"Tell me why I had to be a powerslaaaaave!"

::ahem:: Yes, well . . . thanks for the info. 

Did you seriously just quote Bruce Dickinson? I think you need to take a second look at my screen name.