57139 réponses à ce sujet

[DirtyPhoenix]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

AND O M G I WANT THAT HAIRCUT!!

Thats the Diana Allers haircut if I'm right, you can mod it

how?

Download the ME3 savegame editor:
http://social.biowar...index/9996307/1

And put in this in the hair mesh:
HairMesh: BIOG_HMF_HIR_PRO.Hair_PROJessica.HMF_HIR_PROJessica_MDL
HAIR_Diff: biog_hmf_hir_pro.Global.HAIR_Long_Diff

Sorry for the late reply, I was searching for the link :/

yea I really wish I knew more about computers...

I just discovered the editor the other day, been playing with it ever since. xD

[UrgentArchengel]

Big Bad wrote...

Wasn't there another Bioware announcement scheduled for this morning at PAX? Anybody know what it was about?

[Golferguy758]

[balance5050]

UrgedDuke wrote...

I think it would be A LOT harder to explain the literal ending than it would be to incorporate the IT ... if they weren't already in the process of doing so *fingers crossed*

Yeah, if you think about it, most all the evidence for I.T. would end up just being a plot hole that they would have to write themselves out of. I.T. would be a more elegant solution all around.

[balance5050]

UrgentArchengel wrote...

Big Bad wrote...

Wasn't there another Bioware announcement scheduled for this morning at PAX? Anybody know what it was about?

I think the announcement is the same for all 3 days, (resurgence pack). But we may get some more inside information if they do another panel. I don't know what the deal is for sure though.
  

[UrgedDuke]

balance5050 wrote...

UrgedDuke wrote...

I think it would be A LOT harder to explain the literal ending than it would be to incorporate the IT ... if they weren't already in the process of doing so *fingers crossed*

Yeah, if you think about it, most all the evidence for I.T. would end up just being a plot hole that they would have to write themselves out of. I.T. would be a more elegant solution all around.

also when you consider that the literal ending has hundreds of plot holes that they will have to explain :wizard:

[balance5050]

 

[lex0r11]

HOLY ****

[captainbob8383]

Lately I’ve been thinking about another thing that could also supports the IDT: the fact that the ending DLC is free.

Developing a DLC cost a lot of time and money, budget needs to be validated and the whole thing must be planned among the other BioWare projects, you can’t develop it in the spur of the moment.We could argue whether or not BioWare still has control of the artistic aspect of their games, but one thing I'm fairly sure, they don’t control the budget. BioWare belongs to EA, it's EA's money.

Now why in hell would EA waste their money on a 3-4 months development for a free DLC? They usually even sell day one DLCs!
They could just charge for it, people who liked the ending wouldn’t care, people looking for a decent ending would buy it. Press would even say it shows they care for their angry fans. And they wouldn’t fear to be accused of having sold the game without its ending since the game already has one. The fans are the ones who ask for a new one, for new content, in the eyes of most people there would be nothing wrong with charging for it.

I might be wrong but I think that the DLC is free because it is part of the planed development cycle of ME3.
And remember, Ray Muzyka already announced the ending DLC two weeks after ME3 release, it is ridiculously short.

Modifié par captainbob8383, 07 avril 2012 - 04:59 .

[Big G13]

@ balance5050   SWEET!

Modifié par Big G13, 07 avril 2012 - 05:00 .

[UrgedDuke]

This is slightly off-topic but has anyone ever come up with a solid counter argument for IT that explains why the GodChild is the little boy

[balance5050]

captainbob8383 wrote...

Lately I’ve been thinking about another thing that could also supports the IDT: the fact that the ending DLC is free.

Developing a DLC cost a lot of time and money, budget needs to be validated and the whole thing must be planned among the other BioWare projects, you can’t develop it in the spur of the moment.We could argue whether or not BioWare still has control of the artistic aspect of their games, but one thing I'm fairly sure, they don’t control the budget. BioWare belongs to EA, it's EA's money.

Now why in hell would EA waste their money on a 3-4 months development for a free DLC? They usually even sell day one DLCs!
They could just charge for it, people who liked the ending wouldn’t care, people looking for a decent ending would buy it. Press would even say it shows they care for their angry fans. And they wouldn’t fear to be accused of having sold the game without its ending since the game already has one. The fans are the ones who ask for a new one, for new content, in the eyes of most people there would be nothing wrong with charging for it.

I might be wrong but I think that the DLC is free because it is part of the planed development cycle of ME3.
And remember, Ray Muzyka already announced the ending DLC two weeks after ME3 release, it is ridiculously short.

I'm leaning towards that notion to, 3-4 months is a LONG time to make a few cinematics, it's gonna be awsome I think.

[balance5050]

Big G13 wrote...

@ balance5050   SWEET!

I laughed at it, thought i would share.

[Kyzee]

balance5050 wrote...

 

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

[Jadebaby]

Big G13 wrote...

lol. you were gone a while. I'm sure you gave it your all.

No I just had other things to do lol.

His link didn't work, couldn't find the file for gibbed.

Does gibbed have anything to do with modio?

Modifié par Jade8aby88, 07 avril 2012 - 05:05 .

[Jadebaby]

Golferguy758 wrote...

YES, perfect metaphor! And Jurassic Park too

[Jadebaby]

balance5050 wrote...

 

I think it's funny that the guy and girl on the right handside with the banner are still smiling.

[Big G13]

[quote]Jade8aby88 wrote...

[quote]Big G13 wrote...

[/quote]lol. you were gone a while. I'm sure you gave it your all.[/quote]

No I just had other things to do lol.

His link didn't work, couldn't find the file for gibbed.

Does gibbed have anything to do with modio?[/quote] YEA RIGHT, like I would know. lol. I'm impressed with myself when I post fast enough not to be behind topic. Ask Lex0r11, he seems very capable.

[Kyzee]

IronSabbath88 wrote...

Kyzee wrote...

schneeland wrote...

::snip::

It was both, actually ... I saw a Youtube recording where I understood "shows again how, um, commited our fanbase is".

"Tell me why I had to be a powerslaaaaave!"

::ahem:: Yes, well . . . thanks for the info. 

Did you seriously just quote Bruce Dickinson? I think you need to take a second look at my screen name.

Why, yes, I did. High-five! 

Back on topic, one thing that just caught my attention: at the beginning, right when Shepard spots the kid at the evacuation zone, Kaidan/Ashley moves away, thus unable to witness the child boarding the shuttle. It reminded me of the effect used in Black Swan with Mila Kunis when Natalie Portman comes home from the club high. (I won't go into further details to avoid spoilers for those who haven't seen the movie . . . for some bizarre reason, you nutjobs. GO SEE IT!)

::ahem:: In any event, I'm not saying that this was an intentional parallel, but it would be awfully neat if it was. 

[Jadebaby]

captainbob8383 wrote...

Lately I’ve been thinking about another thing that could also supports the IDT: the fact that the ending DLC is free.

Developing a DLC cost a lot of time and money, budget needs to be validated and the whole thing must be planned among the other BioWare projects, you can’t develop it in the spur of the moment.We could argue whether or not BioWare still has control of the artistic aspect of their games, but one thing I'm fairly sure, they don’t control the budget. BioWare belongs to EA, it's EA's money.

Now why in hell would EA waste their money on a 3-4 months development for a free DLC? They usually even sell day one DLCs!
They could just charge for it, people who liked the ending wouldn’t care, people looking for a decent ending would buy it. Press would even say it shows they care for their angry fans. And they wouldn’t fear to be accused of having sold the game without its ending since the game already has one. The fans are the ones who ask for a new one, for new content, in the eyes of most people there would be nothing wrong with charging for it.

I might be wrong but I think that the DLC is free because it is part of the planed development cycle of ME3.
And remember, Ray Muzyka already announced the ending DLC two weeks after ME3 release, it is ridiculously short.

I agree.
 
I would rather pay for it to be quality with gameplay. I'd also be willing to wait until next year, JUST so they get it 100% right and cover all areas. It will be very controversial what happens either way, so they will only have one chance at it.

[Sire Styx]

I don't know if it's been mentioned before but:

KCox:
Answer: One of the things in the citadel codex is that anyplace -inside- the citadel has emergency seals, and some exterior areas have emergency seals that can keep atmosphere in. Even if the Citadel is destroyed (which it may or may not be in ending), "is not like the entire things blow up." People on (in) the arms may well still be alive. No reason to assume 100% casualtties

I know it says the arms, but especially this bit "some exterior areas have emergency seals that can keep atmosphere in" suggest to me that Shepard may still be on the Citadel when s/he wakes up :|

As unlikely as it would seem,  Shepard may have survived an explosion and the citadel exploding before waking up in some mysterious concrete. If this is true then it's really just proving the lazy bioware theory :|

It really irritates me that they can't give a proper, non-vague answer about IT. In my mind, they don't want to say for definite because it will alienate some gamers. They'd rather juggle all the IT supporters/non supporters so that they buy DLC all the way until summer and don't sell their games on.

I'm thinking the whole 'many endings' thing isn't because there are many endings but many interpretations of the same ending. If that's the case, why not just sell us an empty box and we can imagine our own game with as many endings as we like?

I'd still like to believe in IT though.

Anyone found any new evidence to support IT anyway?

Modifié par Sire Styx, 07 avril 2012 - 05:18 .

[monrapias]

Kyzee wrote...

IronSabbath88 wrote...

Kyzee wrote...

schneeland wrote...

::snip::

It was both, actually ... I saw a Youtube recording where I understood "shows again how, um, commited our fanbase is".

"Tell me why I had to be a powerslaaaaave!"

::ahem:: Yes, well . . . thanks for the info. 

Did you seriously just quote Bruce Dickinson? I think you need to take a second look at my screen name.

Why, yes, I did. High-five! 

Back on topic, one thing that just caught my attention: at the beginning, right when Shepard spots the kid at the evacuation zone, Kaidan/Ashley moves away, thus unable to witness the child boarding the shuttle. It reminded me of the effect used in Black Swan with Mila Kunis when Natalie Portman comes home from the club high. (I won't go into further details to avoid spoilers for those who haven't seen the movie . . . for some bizarre reason, you nutjobs. GO SEE IT!)

::ahem:: In any event, I'm not saying that this was an intentional parallel, but it would be awfully neat if it was. 

I saw the black swan movie, it lasted for 4 minutes or so.

Sure was alot of lesbian stuff in those minutes.

[AnuzaGray]

That's okay with Mila Kunis and Natalia Portman.

[Kyzee]

The lesbain part wasn't why I . . . argh. 

Does anyone see the point I was trying to make?

[DirtyPhoenix]

That link didn't work?

This should..
http://svn.gib.me/builds/masseffect3/

download this one: saveedit-r69_b86.zip

But I tried that hairdo and for some reason my Shep now has war paint all over her face lolz.