protognosis wrote...
Hey GBGriffin,
While normally I'd leave well enough alone, but man that comment about arguing with creationist a few pages back about god was pretty funny.
And its also a good and apt metaphor for how the anti and pro IT people have argued back and forth.
Its sad we are all clinging onto shreds of tweets and reading and rereading into PR statements.
But DuskRose is right about being able to apply IT to the other endings and people being able to play any extra content.
A post on page 1313 (I think) by Arian contained good ideas for how the endings could work with IT.
Haha, thanks.

In one of the threads I created to show off my awful artistic skills with a flowchart, people actually presented some genuinely cool ideas for how to implement IT so that all players received roughly the same amount of content. The thing is, even though they generally shared a common theme...they were also different from one another.
I guess that would be one of my biggest issues. People want BioWare to support "the theory"...but there isn't, imo, a unified one if people are posting their own individual ideas for how to implement the IT. The common element is that Shepard is indoctrinated at the ending...but people are even disagreeing where the rapid indoctrination actually takes place, or if it's even rapid. Because the theory in general seems to vary from person to person with common, but different, elements, so does the opinion of how it should be implemented. It seems like even though a consensus can be reached, someone will then bring up a different, albeit similar, opinion and argue that it is the "better" interpretation.
Again, thanks for directing my attention to Arian's post...I'll make sure to read it. There are good methods of implementation, and even though I personally would be disappointed if they backed the IT....if the implementation was good, I could live with it. It just seems like people have their own idea for how to make it work, and not a unified one that BioWare could support as easily as people think they could.
*edit* Just a smaller point as well: if IT is supported, it would force people to reasses their choices, which some of them actually seem content to make right now. Again, some people support Synthesis and Control as they are right now. I personally don't agree with them, but some make valid points as to why their Shep would choose them. IT would basically reframe all of these choices, and the people who originally picked, say, Control and like it as is would then have to ask themselves "Would I like my Shep to become indoctrinated?"
TBH, I don't think anyone, regardless of their current choice, actually wants their Shep to become indoctrinated. I believe that even true Renegade players would want their Shep to retain his or her individuality, not become a Reaper slave. To me, Destroy would still feel a bit forced...but, again, if they could actually come up with a way to make it work for those non-Destroy choosing players, I'd be more supportive of it.
Modifié par GBGriffin, 08 avril 2012 - 06:56 .