Skillz1986 wrote...
I have been supporting (and still am) IT from a fairly early stage (page 100..maybe before that) an i really think it's a well thought through idea. i do however not believe it was intended (i did in the beginning..that has changed appearently).
I'll try to point out why:
The incomplete game argument was brought up a lot from what i can tell, it has been addresed (most of the times wit the "it has been done before" answer) and while i support the answers, and (kind od....wait for it) dismiss this argument, it holds some truth. would IT im fact have been planned before the outburst. biwoware surely would have waited a reasonable time..only to blow our minds with the following dlc, on that i can agree. but what do we have now:
1. A game without an definite ending
2. No closure what so ever
3.(worst part) assumingly MONTHS of uncertainty.
That's how you treat players who spent 60 bucks (or 89 in my case..collector's edition)...who expected a great game (check) but also a great conclusion to the trilogy (well...no!). You know, the difference between a game..or let's say a movie, is that you can enjoy the game at your own pace...but now i am forced to wait for an ending, which might or might not provide closure, leaving it to me and my immagination, while i wait for it in utter uncertainty. it drives me mad.
From gamer's and firts an foremost..from a customer's perspective. i think..if they decided to implement IT..i happened after the huge negative backlash...
Or they just really..i mean REALLY suck hard at pr...because all of this is just too much uncertainty and speculation...for a far too long time period. that's how i feel at least. still holding the line
Well biowares good at that, but the thing that makes me think It was pre planned is all the in-game evidence that gave rise to IT in the first place...




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




