lex0r11 wrote...
Dwailing wrote...
Why would you be banned for that? I think she would take it as a compliment, not a "personal attack".
No, i mean for picture spamming.
Ah.
lex0r11 wrote...
Dwailing wrote...
Why would you be banned for that? I think she would take it as a compliment, not a "personal attack".
No, i mean for picture spamming.
Dwailing wrote...
Tirian Thorn wrote...
IronSabbath88 wrote...
I'd really like to know why people don't think BioWare had this planned.. QA is being done already. Which means they already had at least some things ready, there's NO way you can do even just cinematics in like 5 days since the announcement. Certainly wouldn't be in the QA stage if they were just starting it.
I'm convinced they had this planned, and who knows, it may have been scheduled for a later date but they had to rush to finish it because of this backlash.
Another point I keep bringing up, but that needs to be mentioned:
Bioware knew the ending would generate speculation, discussion and that it would be polarizing. They knew it from day one and get this - they wanted it. ME3 has gotten more attention than any other game. Maybe they don't like some of the hate mail they're getting, but press is good. People who normally wouldn't check out ME3 probably did just to see what the fuss was.
I think it is possible that they had ending DLC planned from day one, but that they weren't set of all the specifics. Due to backlash they decided to move things forward at a quicker pace than planned.
You make a good point. This is quite possibly the most well known thing in gaming right now. I mean, this controversy has been in FORBES for crying out loud!
Modifié par Tirian Thorn, 13 avril 2012 - 05:08 .
Guest_Trust_*
Modifié par I1 Trust, 13 avril 2012 - 05:17 .
Tirian Thorn wrote...
This whole thing was deliberate. They knew the ending would be polarizing, etc.
So based on that you can look at it a couple ways:
1) They planned to end the discussion by releasing “something” to clarify the ending
a. DLC
b. A press release
2) They planned to let the discussion continue until people give up in frustration.
3) They were never going to clarify anything. But they didn’t expect the discussion & backlash to get so heated and now they’re back-peddling.
Which of those seems most likely given the track record of Bioware?
Dwailing wrote...
savagejuicebox wrote...
RADIUMEYEZ wrote...
NoSpin wrote...
llbountyhunter wrote...
lol... Jessicas on to us.
https://twitter.com/...667786358493185
Quick everybody scatter!
OH CRAP! *hides under rug*
Good, maybe she will stop stating everything like it is complete fact....
OI! Don't talk that way about my woman!
Dwailing wrote...
KneeTheCap wrote...
But why don't they just either confirm or deny it? What do they have to lose?
On a side note, I'm having humongous trouble with my 3rd playthrough, it's like an emotional rollercoaster O.o
Knee's timeline of...things:
1st playthrough: "omg this game is awesome, I'm hyped as heck"
Ending comes: "umm...?"
- Finds indoc theory, has an epiphany
2nd playthrough: "Omg this game is awesome, I can't believe I missed all these little clues"
Ending comes: "ha! You can't fool me, kid", feels like a winner
- PAX and Bioware's DLC announcement. Serious doubts creep into the mind
3rd playthough: "Omg this game is awesome...but what if the theory is wrong..no, it has to be correct!..but what if it's not"
Ending is most likely not coming..
Geez...
Don't give up! Hold the Line! For Marauder Shields and Jessica Merizan!
DreamTension wrote...
Tirian Thorn wrote...
This whole thing was deliberate. They knew the ending would be polarizing, etc.
So based on that you can look at it a couple ways:
1) They planned to end the discussion by releasing “something” to clarify the ending
a. DLC
b. A press release
2) They planned to let the discussion continue until people give up in frustration.
3) They were never going to clarify anything. But they didn’t expect the discussion & backlash to get so heated and now they’re back-peddling.
Which of those seems most likely given the track record of Bioware?
4) Time was short, they (or one person) rushed out a 10 minute ending to a trilogy that involves +150 hours of gameplay because they already delayed once and they needed the game out asap.
Seriously, what happens more in the entertainment industry? Rushed products or carefully and meticolously planned future content releases?
Modifié par llbountyhunter, 13 avril 2012 - 05:13 .
llbountyhunter wrote...
DreamTension wrote...
Tirian Thorn wrote...
This whole thing was deliberate. They knew the ending would be polarizing, etc.
So based on that you can look at it a couple ways:
1) They planned to end the discussion by releasing “something” to clarify the ending
a. DLC
b. A press release
2) They planned to let the discussion continue until people give up in frustration.
3) They were never going to clarify anything. But they didn’t expect the discussion & backlash to get so heated and now they’re back-peddling.
Which of those seems most likely given the track record of Bioware?
4) Time was short, they (or one person) rushed out a 10 minute ending to a trilogy that involves +150 hours of gameplay because they already delayed once and they needed the game out asap.
Seriously, what happens more in the entertainment industry? Rushed products or carefully and meticolously planned future content releases?
i think that ties in to number 1.... exept they didnt rush it.
DreamTension wrote...
llbountyhunter wrote...
DreamTension wrote...
Tirian Thorn wrote...
This whole thing was deliberate. They knew the ending would be polarizing, etc.
So based on that you can look at it a couple ways:
1) They planned to end the discussion by releasing “something” to clarify the ending
a. DLC
b. A press release
2) They planned to let the discussion continue until people give up in frustration.
3) They were never going to clarify anything. But they didn’t expect the discussion & backlash to get so heated and now they’re back-peddling.
Which of those seems most likely given the track record of Bioware?
4) Time was short, they (or one person) rushed out a 10 minute ending to a trilogy that involves +150 hours of gameplay because they already delayed once and they needed the game out asap.
Seriously, what happens more in the entertainment industry? Rushed products or carefully and meticolously planned future content releases?
i think that ties in to number 1.... exept they didnt rush it.
I think it ties to #3 more, but whatever. I was just being cynical. Even though I'm a believer/lover of IDT, I can't remain optimistic of it much longer.
Tirian Thorn wrote...
DreamTension wrote...
llbountyhunter wrote...
DreamTension wrote...
Tirian Thorn wrote...
This whole thing was deliberate. They knew the ending would be polarizing, etc.
So based on that you can look at it a couple ways:
1) They planned to end the discussion by releasing “something” to clarify the ending
a. DLC
b. A press release
2) They planned to let the discussion continue until people give up in frustration.
3) They were never going to clarify anything. But they didn’t expect the discussion & backlash to get so heated and now they’re back-peddling.
Which of those seems most likely given the track record of Bioware?
4) Time was short, they (or one person) rushed out a 10 minute ending to a trilogy that involves +150 hours of gameplay because they already delayed once and they needed the game out asap.
Seriously, what happens more in the entertainment industry? Rushed products or carefully and meticolously planned future content releases?
i think that ties in to number 1.... exept they didnt rush it.
I think it ties to #3 more, but whatever. I was just being cynical. Even though I'm a believer/lover of IDT, I can't remain optimistic of it much longer.
And that's a good point. They are pushing more people into the "cynacil camp" by not being a little more straight-forward.
llbountyhunter wrote...
have any of you all seen this?
http://www.forbes.co...-america-award/
Modifié par Tirian Thorn, 13 avril 2012 - 05:43 .
RADIUMEYEZ wrote...
NoSpin wrote...
llbountyhunter wrote...
lol... Jessicas on to us.
https://twitter.com/...667786358493185
Quick everybody scatter!
OH CRAP! *hides under rug*
Rifneno wrote...
RADIUMEYEZ wrote...
NoSpin wrote...
llbountyhunter wrote...
lol... Jessicas on to us.
https://twitter.com/...667786358493185
Quick everybody scatter!
OH CRAP! *hides under rug*
'the hell? Was that seriously about this thread? There was no attack intended in any of that, we simply said people are taking her comments as more than (I believe) she intends them because she speaks for the company. And her gender wasn't brought up as derogatory in the least ("stupid girl"?!), we were just telling our fellow posters to stop thinking with the wrong head.
I really hope that's about another thread in the nuclear wastelands that is the ME3 forums, but if it's not then it's another example of how easily things can be misinterpreted over text.
Allan Schumacher wrote...
Earthborn_Shepard wrote...
Soooo I'm back! Any interesting news?
The nutrient rich sludge was delicious!
Rifneno wrote...
RADIUMEYEZ wrote...
NoSpin wrote...
llbountyhunter wrote...
lol... Jessicas on to us.
https://twitter.com/...667786358493185
Quick everybody scatter!
OH CRAP! *hides under rug*
'the hell? Was that seriously about this thread? There was no attack intended in any of that, we simply said people are taking her comments as more than (I believe) she intends them because she speaks for the company. And her gender wasn't brought up as derogatory in the least ("stupid girl"?!), we were just telling our fellow posters to stop thinking with the wrong head.
I really hope that's about another thread in the nuclear wastelands that is the ME3 forums, but if it's not then it's another example of how easily things can be misinterpreted over text.
KneeTheCap wrote...
Someone said (Gamble?) that the ending DLC was not planned and that they did not know it was needed.
Parabolee77 wrote...
I have been a long time lurker to this thread but have not posted often (or at all I don't recall), mainly because I read on my phone.
However several people have asked if someone could put together a comprehensive list of all the clues that have been brought to light so far.
I have taken it upon myself to undertake that task. My plan is for it to be an extremely thorough reference source for all elements of both the Indoctrination Theory and it's criticisms. Along with all the clues and related information from comments made by Bioware. It will source all it's information and include many images and links to related materials.
It probably will not be finished today but it is already well underway.
Just wanted to give people a heads up and something to look forward to. I should have the first version complete tomorrow and intend to keep it up to date and revised as need be.
Thanks and Hold the Line
lex0r11 wrote...
Totally unrelated:
For all Witcher 2 Fans, the Enhanced Edition can be preloaded now from the site/launcher.
10gb's.
Modifié par KellanC, 13 avril 2012 - 07:55 .
Parabolee77 wrote...
Parabolee77 wrote...
I have been a long time lurker to this thread but have not posted often (or at all I don't recall), mainly because I read on my phone.
However several people have asked if someone could put together a comprehensive list of all the clues that have been brought to light so far.
I have taken it upon myself to undertake that task. My plan is for it to be an extremely thorough reference source for all elements of both the Indoctrination Theory and it's criticisms. Along with all the clues and related information from comments made by Bioware. It will source all it's information and include many images and links to related materials.
It probably will not be finished today but it is already well underway.
Just wanted to give people a heads up and something to look forward to. I should have the first version complete tomorrow and intend to keep it up to date and revised as need be.
Thanks and Hold the Line
I have almost compled the first draft of this. It's stands at about 4,000 words so far
Currently it is written on my personal blog, but I want people's opinions on where I should post it? Should I leave it there and link it here and maybe in a new thread?
Or should I reformat it into it's own thread on this board?
Also who would be willing to be to preview it for feedback and error checking?
Thanks!
Modifié par llbountyhunter, 13 avril 2012 - 07:48 .