That means nothing. I could argue that the Reapers are V'Ger from the Star Trek The Motion Picture using that logic.Celrath wrote...
Something to make you go Hmmm .
[snipped images]
Was the ending a hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory
#3626
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:49
#3627
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:50
I'm not so sure: I'm sure the forums would catch on fire, but they do that periodically anyway. I could see Bioware doing it because of all the leaks and if the final conclusion to Mass Effect 3 came out and everyone started spoiling it for the people who hadn't had it released in their regions yet, that would really suck (I know it was hard to find a non spoiling thread in the non spoilers section before the game released in America) People might be mad, but I think that some people would realize that the fact that Bioware managed to prank so many players was something to be respected in a sense (like, well played Bioware)Dilandau3000 wrote...
krystalevenstar wrote...
I think the people saying that Bioware isn't good enough/couldn't pull this off
No, I'm actually saying the opposite. I'm saying they aren't stupid enough to pull this off. Because coming out after the fact and saying "haha, fooled you" would make me even more angry and would be the stupidest decision in writing history, even if it did improve the ending.
Such a manoeuvre would not be the most epic stunt in gaming history, it would be the most epic betrayal in gaming history.
#3628
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:50
If you enter the final battle with a too low EMS, the reapers win for real (earth destroyed, galaxy harvested). I find it more likely that that was what he meant.Lugaidster wrote...
Auresta wrote...
http://www.nowgamer....in_bioware.html
Does this hold relevance now?
It certainly does, if you pick what we call indoctrinated endings, the reapers win.
Modifié par Dilandau3000, 12 mars 2012 - 06:51 .
#3629
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:50
Linus108 wrote...
Can someone explain to me (if this theory is correct), how Shepard wakes up in London? If she was indoctrinated, wouldn't that be game over? How did she awake from the hallucination?
Also wouldn't the reapers have destroyed all of earth if she had failed...
The wake up in london requires you to pick the "right choice" (reaper destruction) and a good deal of gallactic points/forces. So I'd say that she could only break out of the spell because you had enough backups and chose the right answer.
Cheers
#3630
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:51
Dilandau3000 wrote...
krystalevenstar wrote...
I think the people saying that Bioware isn't good enough/couldn't pull this off
No, I'm actually saying the opposite. I'm saying they aren't stupid enough to pull this off. Because coming out after the fact and saying "haha, fooled you" would make me even more angry and would be the stupidest decision in writing history, even if it did improve the ending.
Such a manoeuvre would not be the most epic stunt in gaming history, it would be the most epic betrayal in gaming history.
*edited*
Read you response to someone else, see where you are coming from now.
Modifié par Terraforming2154, 12 mars 2012 - 06:52 .
#3631
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:52
Dilandau3000 wrote...
If you enter the final battle with a too low EMS, the reapers win for real (earth destroyed, galaxy harvested). I find it more likely that that was what he meant.Lugaidster wrote...
Auresta wrote...
http://www.nowgamer....in_bioware.html
Does this hold relevance now?
It certainly does, if you pick what we call indoctrinated endings, the reapers win.
Uhh no they don't. Both the reapers and the Earth die. Everything is destroyed, I don't see that as a reaper victory.
#3632
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:52
krystalevenstar wrote...
I think the people saying that Bioware isn't good enough/couldn't pull this off should really take a look at what they're saying. We're talking about the same people that created this world, crafted each of the games, including this one which everyone pretty much agrees is utterly fantastic until the last 10 minutes. They have more invested in this than even we do. This is their baby. They wouldn't undermine everything they've accomplished with the lackluster ending we have now. All of the evidence we've compiled isn't 'just coincidence' anymore, and we're not scrambling to find things to make this fit. They're not going to say "Hey, look at what these people came up with, let's run with that!" This was planned. There's a clear, deliberate and methodical, cohesive way to follow it to this conclusion. It was easy to say that they might have just missed these things and since this makes so much sense they'd go with it in the beginning, but there is just too many things that fit now. If all the people in this thread have come up with this conclusion from what we've discovered, do you really think that after X amount of years of development, no one on the ME team noticed these things?
THIS IS DELIBERATE.
And it's brilliant.
It will go down not only as one of the greatest game series in history, but the greatest reveal for the ending of that series.
Mass Effect could never go out on a whimper, it's going to go out on an earthshattering bang. Just like it should.
I agree somethings up....the game is not over yet imo
but they still made a game that is amazing. I mean uncharted is a great game but its a movie you dont have any real control. This game has so many things that no one will have the same game
same endings but the path is too varied. My friend did not see thane or jack because of just a simple goof
then i go and import the old save where tali was exiled and si in my game i could not save the gethand quarians and it sucked
but that was my fault
and i do not see how a new game would be that great as its the import of my me2 team to help me that made this game
#3633
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:52
Jenaimarre wrote...
Guys, here's a tweet by Jessica Merizan, it may not mean anything so take it with a grain of salt.
@o1striker that's kind of how I interpreted it as a dying hallucination, but I'm not a dev so I don't know what was intended.
http://twitter.com/J...692740471721985
I was looking for this, thanks.
#3634
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:52
Linus108 wrote...
Can someone explain to me (if this theory is correct), how Shepard wakes up in London? If she was indoctrinated, wouldn't that be game over? How did she awake from the hallucination?
Also wouldn't the reapers have destroyed all of earth if she had failed...
Implied in this thread: Shepard never boarded the Citadel! The part starting from when Shepad "wakes up" from Harbinger's blast to the "ending" is the whole process of indoctrintation. The secret ending shows Shepard really waking up after solidifying his resolve to destroy the Reapers (ie, choosing the red destroy option).
#3635
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:53
Except they released the game a month before April Fools.Sajuro wrote...
I'm not so sure: I'm sure the forums would catch on fire, but they do that periodically anyway. I could see Bioware doing it because of all the leaks and if the final conclusion to Mass Effect 3 came out and everyone started spoiling it for the people who hadn't had it released in their regions yet, that would really suck (I know it was hard to find a non spoiling thread in the non spoilers section before the game released in America) People might be mad, but I think that some people would realize that the fact that Bioware managed to prank so many players was something to be respected in a sense (like, well played Bioware)Dilandau3000 wrote...
krystalevenstar wrote...
I think the people saying that Bioware isn't good enough/couldn't pull this off
No, I'm actually saying the opposite. I'm saying they aren't stupid enough to pull this off. Because coming out after the fact and saying "haha, fooled you" would make me even more angry and would be the stupidest decision in writing history, even if it did improve the ending.
Such a manoeuvre would not be the most epic stunt in gaming history, it would be the most epic betrayal in gaming history.
... Now that would've been epic. The biggest April Fools prank ever.
#3636
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:53
#3637
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:54
#3638
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:54
I was under the impression that if your EMS was really low you wouldn't even get to the Citadel, it would just be game over, reapers win. I'm not talking about the "everything gets disintegrated" ending.Lugaidster wrote...
Dilandau3000 wrote...
If you enter the final battle with a too low EMS, the reapers win for real (earth destroyed, galaxy harvested). I find it more likely that that was what he meant.Lugaidster wrote...
Auresta wrote...
http://www.nowgamer....in_bioware.html
Does this hold relevance now?
It certainly does, if you pick what we call indoctrinated endings, the reapers win.
Uhh no they don't. Both the reapers and the Earth die. Everything is destroyed, I don't see that as a reaper victory.
#3639
Guest_forsaken gamer_*
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:54
Guest_forsaken gamer_*
Sounds as good as any to me, right now.Warhawk7137 wrote...
Warhawk7137 wrote...
My own intepretation is that the "catalyst" is 3 things in one: Harbinger, exerting as much hold as he can over Shepard; Shepard's subconscious manifestation of TIM; and Shepard's subconscious manifestation of Anderson.
The drawbacks of each choice are voiced by the other 2, essentially. I.E., the stated drawbacks of the destroy ending are the destruction of synthetic life including the Geth and EDI (which is Harbinger playing on Shepard's fears, becasue Harbinger doesn't want the kind of harmony between synthetics and organics that Shepard has accomplished - he wants to domiante them), and the destruction of the relays (which is Shepard's subsoncious manifestation of TIM, trying to convince him that to destroy the Reapers would harm the galaxy by inhibiting technological progress, and that organics should use that power instead). It also explains why the drawbacks for control and synthesis are essentially the same - because it's Anderson warning Shepard that, by going down either path, he will essentially lose himself, and everything he's stood for. As for the synthesis ending, strictly speaking that's what the Reapers already are - a synthesis of organic and synthetic in a truly horrifying way.
So, there are really only 2 possible endings. The catalyst fires and the Reapers are destroyed, or it doesn't and they aren't (because control means the Reapers win, because you can't control them).
Basically, the endings line up as follows:
Control: Arrogance. Desire for power. Represents the delusion that you are in control, like TIM, but you are not. Ultimately futile. Pride is your downfall.
Synthesis: Despair. You give up. Represents acceptance of the idea that organics and synthetics alike shouldn't be able to choose their own path. Let the reapers win, and become one with them.
Destroy: Defiance. Do what you set out to do in the first place. Represents staying true to the belief that we ought to be able to make our own future. Life doesn't need to be guided - it can guide itself.
Thread is moving pretty fast... anyone like this interpretation?
I do believe like you, that choosing Synthesis [green(representing life as someone else posted?)] is giving up, unless that is what your Shepard truly believes in. If your Shepard truly believed in Synthesis as the best way, that would seem to be quite a contradiction in his/her character within the story.
Interestingly, I was looking at the bik files in the movies folder, and
noticed that there are good and bad ending videos for the blue and red,
but only a good video of the green. No bad green video.
#3640
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:55
Dilandau3000 wrote...
krystalevenstar wrote...
I think the people saying that Bioware isn't good enough/couldn't pull this off
No, I'm actually saying the opposite. I'm saying they aren't stupid enough to pull this off. Because coming out after the fact and saying "haha, fooled you" would make me even more angry and would be the stupidest decision in writing history, even if it did improve the ending.
Such a manoeuvre would not be the most epic stunt in gaming history, it would be the most epic betrayal in gaming history.
No worse than the ending as it stands. Unfortunately. Quite a betrayal it was/is.
#3641
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:55
Linus108 wrote...
Can someone explain to me (if this theory is correct), how Shepard wakes up in London? If she was indoctrinated, wouldn't that be game over? How did she awake from the hallucination?
Also wouldn't the reapers have destroyed all of earth if she had failed...
That's the thing, you only get the 'waking in rubble' scene if you choose the destroy option with enough war assets. Destroy = breaking free from the indoctrination by sticking to your convictions about destroying the reapers whatever the cost (possibly the geth/edi ASSUMING the child wasn't lying to you to dissuade you from that choice.)
#3642
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:55
byne wrote...
15. Shepard is not wearing his armor when he wakes up in the Citadel, implying that this is a dream.
He is wearing his armor, but it has been severly damaged
#3643
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:56
Dilandau3000 wrote...
That means nothing. I could argue that the Reapers are V'Ger from the Star Trek The Motion Picture using that logic.Celrath wrote...
Something to make you go Hmmm .
[snipped images]
Dude! Seriously! What's with the BM. No need for that.
#3644
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:56
UKillMeLongTime wrote...
also ya really have to work to get a real crappy ending as it was easy getting over 5k much less 4k
Did you play MP because I found it difficult to get it to 4,000 - I'm currently at 3,800 (something or other) and don't want to touch MP with a ten foot pole. Bleh.
Edit: meaning EMS after the 50% hit - my total is 6,000 (blah-di-blah more numbers).
Modifié par aquaticidioticus, 12 mars 2012 - 06:58 .
#3645
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:57
Dilandau3000 wrote...
I was under the impression that if your EMS was really low you wouldn't even get to the Citadel, it would just be game over, reapers win. I'm not talking about the "everything gets disintegrated" ending.Lugaidster wrote...
Dilandau3000 wrote...
If you enter the final battle with a too low EMS, the reapers win for real (earth destroyed, galaxy harvested). I find it more likely that that was what he meant.Lugaidster wrote...
Auresta wrote...
http://www.nowgamer....in_bioware.html
Does this hold relevance now?
It certainly does, if you pick what we call indoctrinated endings, the reapers win.
Uhh no they don't. Both the reapers and the Earth die. Everything is destroyed, I don't see that as a reaper victory.
According to the IGN guide there's no such ending. Either that or any "game over" is considered a victory for the reapers.
#3646
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:58
Linus108 wrote...
Can someone explain to me (if this theory is correct), how Shepard wakes up in London? If she was indoctrinated, wouldn't that be game over? How did she awake from the hallucination?
Also wouldn't the reapers have destroyed all of earth if she had failed...
Well this has been said a bunch of time but the idea is that choosing to destroy the reapers is you breaking free from indoctrination, which is why destroy is the only ending you end up alive on. Also it only happens if you have high war assets, this is assumed to factor into how much time they could buy you before all hope is lost etc.
#3648
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:58
#3649
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:58
XCMichael wrote...
Linus108 wrote...
Can someone explain to me (if this theory is correct), how Shepard wakes up in London? If she was indoctrinated, wouldn't that be game over? How did she awake from the hallucination?
Also wouldn't the reapers have destroyed all of earth if she had failed...
Implied in this thread: Shepard never boarded the Citadel! The part starting from when Shepad "wakes up" from Harbinger's blast to the "ending" is the whole process of indoctrintation. The secret ending shows Shepard really waking up after solidifying his resolve to destroy the Reapers (ie, choosing the red destroy option).
Okay, this is the clarification I needed. So you are saying that: Shepard broke from the indoctrination process: and that is why Shepard woke up.
What was confusing me is, I assumed that once you are indoctrinated, that's it. That you can't really fight it. Now the choices at the end do make sense.
#3650
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 06:58
I'm sorry, I'm overreacting to people using things as proof that really aren't anything of the sort because of some things I've had to deal with in real life recently. No offense was intended.Lugaidster wrote...
Dilandau3000 wrote...
That means nothing. I could argue that the Reapers are V'Ger from the Star Trek The Motion Picture using that logic.Celrath wrote...
Something to make you go Hmmm .
[snipped images]
Dude! Seriously! What's with the BM. No need for that.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




