As for Anderson having a skill tree, I could REALLY see him being a default squadmate in the new content. It would make perfect sense. Here's hoping they do that.
Was the ending a hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory
Débuté par
byne
, mars 10 2012 12:46
-
Ce sujet est fermé
- Show only BioWare posts
Retour en haut
#36627
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 12:01
Skillz1986
-
- Members
- 685 messages
Well, i don't know what time it is wherever you guys happen to be right now but over here, it is beyond god damn time i got to bed. gotta work tomorrow (yeah..no kidding. it's like indentured servitude). So, good night.
#36628
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 12:16
schneeland
-
- Members
- 548 messages
Yeah, time for standby for rudimentary creatures of blood and flesh.
However, as a last statement for today: it's incredibly how vast the Citadel feels in ME1. The controls are actually a bit clumsier than I remembered, but the rest of the game is still amazing.
However, as a last statement for today: it's incredibly how vast the Citadel feels in ME1. The controls are actually a bit clumsier than I remembered, but the rest of the game is still amazing.
#36629
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 12:42
crazyeye343
-
- Members
- 21 messages
the infiltrator is a great class to (love the adapt in ME3 also) just going invisible and lining up the perfect head-shot...
#36630
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 12:49
spotlessvoid
-
- Members
- 3 497 messages
How big of a fan can someone not downloading major mission dlc, barring lack of access, really be? How invested in the story line is someone who doesn't have lotb or arrival as must plays?
I feel like if anything, Biowares Mass Effect team has been tremendously focused on their core fanbase, and only care enough about the story for new players to get them through single player without a total wtf expression the whole time
I feel like if anything, Biowares Mass Effect team has been tremendously focused on their core fanbase, and only care enough about the story for new players to get them through single player without a total wtf expression the whole time
#36631
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 12:52
SirLugash
-
- Members
- 388 messages
This probably has nothing to do with IT but I wanted to share this with you guys.
I did another ME2 run and just completed the Arrival DLC.
Because of this I watched the video of the bad ME2: Arrival ending (when you let the timer run out):
www.youtube.com/watch
I just noticed that when Harbinger is floating in the Citadel, he shoots more yellow colored beams (might be because of the applied filters in that sequence) which seems for me to come from his "eyes" and not red ones from under his body.
Anyways, I wonder why BioWare didn't make something similar to this as the ultimate bad ending (which kills you, your people and let the reapers continue the cycle).
Also, there is one scene in which you and all your squadmates including TIM are seen with Harbinger on Illium.
Could this be a hint to an upcoming DLC ?
I can't really believe they put all these things into a cutscene (that most people would probably never see) for nothing.
This is slow-dowm version of the scene if you want to take a closer look:
www.youtube.com/watch
I did another ME2 run and just completed the Arrival DLC.
Because of this I watched the video of the bad ME2: Arrival ending (when you let the timer run out):
www.youtube.com/watch
I just noticed that when Harbinger is floating in the Citadel, he shoots more yellow colored beams (might be because of the applied filters in that sequence) which seems for me to come from his "eyes" and not red ones from under his body.
Anyways, I wonder why BioWare didn't make something similar to this as the ultimate bad ending (which kills you, your people and let the reapers continue the cycle).
Also, there is one scene in which you and all your squadmates including TIM are seen with Harbinger on Illium.
Could this be a hint to an upcoming DLC ?
I can't really believe they put all these things into a cutscene (that most people would probably never see) for nothing.
This is slow-dowm version of the scene if you want to take a closer look:
www.youtube.com/watch
Modifié par SirLugash, 15 avril 2012 - 12:54 .
#36632
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 12:54
crazyeye343
-
- Members
- 21 messages
spotlessvoid wrote...
How big of a fan can someone not downloading major mission dlc, barring lack of access, really be? How invested in the story line is someone who doesn't have lotb or arrival as must plays?
I feel like if anything, Biowares Mass Effect team has been tremendously focused on their core fanbase, and only care enough about the story for new players to get them through single player without a total wtf expression the whole time
my only response to this:
I completely agree
#36633
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:07
IronSabbath88
-
- Members
- 1 810 messages
spotlessvoid wrote...
How big of a fan can someone not downloading major mission dlc, barring lack of access, really be? How invested in the story line is someone who doesn't have lotb or arrival as must plays?
I feel like if anything, Biowares Mass Effect team has been tremendously focused on their core fanbase, and only care enough about the story for new players to get them through single player without a total wtf expression the whole time
You think that's bad? People are claiming they won't get the DLC in the summer.
Free DLC... and they won't download it.
#36634
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:09
Asharad Hett
-
- Members
- 1 492 messages
Yeah. Kinda hard to boycott free DLC and still call yourself a fan.IronSabbath88 wrote...
You think that's bad? People are claiming they won't get the DLC in the summer.
Free DLC... and they won't download it.
#36635
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:17
KneeTheCap
-
- Members
- 580 messages
One more thing 
About the infamous "um" in the PAX panel thingie... why did it generate such a fuss? If one looks at the video, the "um" is just a normal..."um"..
Is it not?
About the infamous "um" in the PAX panel thingie... why did it generate such a fuss? If one looks at the video, the "um" is just a normal..."um"..
Is it not?
#36636
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:20
crazyeye343
-
- Members
- 21 messages
i know i'm kinda responding crazy right now (my bad) but i'm curious. GBGriffin you said you were gonna do and insanity run. hows that going?
#36637
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:20
IronSabbath88
-
- Members
- 1 810 messages
KneeTheCap wrote...
One more thing
About the infamous "um" in the PAX panel thingie... why did it generate such a fuss? If one looks at the video, the "um" is just a normal..."um"..
Is it not?
LOL. Glad to see this brought back up again.
Yep, it was used as a way to disprove the theory believe it or not. It died quickly, and rightfully so because the anti IT people can't have us having proof to show that they were grasping at straws far harder than we were.
#36638
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:21
spotlessvoid
-
- Members
- 3 497 messages
That was my interpretationKneeTheCap wrote...
One more thing
About the infamous "um" in the PAX panel thingie... why did it generate such a fuss? If one looks at the video, the "um" is just a normal..."um"..
Is it not?
Also, the laugh was in response to the audience laughing, and in no way seemed mocking of IT
#36639
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:24
IronSabbath88
-
- Members
- 1 810 messages
The audience didn't laugh at the theory itself. They cheered infact. They laughed when Gamble said how commited the fanbase is.
#36640
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:27
spotlessvoid
-
- Members
- 3 497 messages
I've actually downloaded the pax footage, along with other interviews to compare less stressful circumstances,, and currently am in the process of looking for speech patterns and non verbal tells. It will be afew days, but I'm going to attempt to find some clues to their responses.
My gut tells me it's actually quite the IT confirmation
My gut tells me it's actually quite the IT confirmation
#36641
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:28
spotlessvoid
-
- Members
- 3 497 messages
ExactlyIronSabbath88 wrote...
The audience didn't laugh at the theory itself. They cheered infact. They laughed when Gamble said how commited the fanbase is.
#36642
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:35
balance5050
-
- Members
- 5 245 messages
IronSabbath88 wrote...
The audience didn't laugh at the theory itself. They cheered infact. They laughed when Gamble said how commited the fanbase is.
This^
#36643
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 01:46
Rifneno
-
- Members
- 12 076 messages
Well see, it's like this. The IT opponents don't have any actual evidence to work with. So they have to make stuff up out of nothing. I kind of feel bad for them. It must cost you a lot in life to be so stubborn you'll never admit you're wrong about anything, ever.
#36644
Guest_ConVito_*
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 02:00
Guest_ConVito_*
Guest_ConVito_*
-
- Guests
Rifneno wrote...
Well see, it's like this. The IT opponents don't have any actual evidence to work with. So they have to make stuff up out of nothing. I kind of feel bad for them. It must cost you a lot in life to be so stubborn you'll never admit you're wrong about anything, ever.
To be fair, we don't have much "actual" evidence either (just moments in the games that lend themselves heavily to this particular interpretation). But at least ours is a little more involved than the anti-ITers go-to response ("cause BioWare is lazy!")
#36645
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 02:10
Rifneno
-
- Members
- 12 076 messages
ConVito wrote...
To be fair, we don't have much "actual" evidence either (just moments in the games that lend themselves heavily to this particular interpretation).
Thanks for the thought, but we didn't really need a joke to break the tension.
#36646
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 02:13
balance5050
-
- Members
- 5 245 messages
Rifneno wrote...
ConVito wrote...
To be fair, we don't have much "actual" evidence either (just moments in the games that lend themselves heavily to this particular interpretation).
Thanks for the thought, but we didn't really need a joke to break the tension.
LOL, kinda true though, when all three games serve as evidence, it feels like a lot.
Modifié par balance5050, 15 avril 2012 - 02:14 .
#36647
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 02:47
EpyonX3
-
- Members
- 2 374 messages
SirLugash wrote...
This probably has nothing to do with IT but I wanted to share this with you guys.
I did another ME2 run and just completed the Arrival DLC.
Because of this I watched the video of the bad ME2: Arrival ending (when you let the timer run out):
www.youtube.com/watch
I just noticed that when Harbinger is floating in the Citadel, he shoots more yellow colored beams (might be because of the applied filters in that sequence) which seems for me to come from his "eyes" and not red ones from under his body.
Anyways, I wonder why BioWare didn't make something similar to this as the ultimate bad ending (which kills you, your people and let the reapers continue the cycle).
Also, there is one scene in which you and all your squadmates including TIM are seen with Harbinger on Illium.
Could this be a hint to an upcoming DLC ?
I can't really believe they put all these things into a cutscene (that most people would probably never see) for nothing.
This is slow-dowm version of the scene if you want to take a closer look:
www.youtube.com/watch
Woah I've never seen that! I think they probably wanted Harbinger to shoot yello beams at first but probably changed it to red for ME3. I'd rather see the red to be honest.
Didn't bioware say there were no "reapers win" ending planned though?
I can understand them adding TIM. It wasn't known that he was with the reapers or at least had ties with them. It is weird that they put it there. Perhaps the had plans to have TIM play a different role but scrapped it.
#36648
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 02:49
balance5050
-
- Members
- 5 245 messages
EpyonX3 wrote...
SirLugash wrote...
This probably has nothing to do with IT but I wanted to share this with you guys.
I did another ME2 run and just completed the Arrival DLC.
Because of this I watched the video of the bad ME2: Arrival ending (when you let the timer run out):
www.youtube.com/watch
I just noticed that when Harbinger is floating in the Citadel, he shoots more yellow colored beams (might be because of the applied filters in that sequence) which seems for me to come from his "eyes" and not red ones from under his body.
Anyways, I wonder why BioWare didn't make something similar to this as the ultimate bad ending (which kills you, your people and let the reapers continue the cycle).
Also, there is one scene in which you and all your squadmates including TIM are seen with Harbinger on Illium.
Could this be a hint to an upcoming DLC ?
I can't really believe they put all these things into a cutscene (that most people would probably never see) for nothing.
This is slow-dowm version of the scene if you want to take a closer look:
www.youtube.com/watch
Woah I've never seen that! I think they probably wanted Harbinger to shoot yello beams at first but probably changed it to red for ME3. I'd rather see the red to be honest.
Didn't bioware say there were no "reapers win" ending planned though?
I can understand them adding TIM. It wasn't known that he was with the reapers or at least had ties with them. It is weird that they put it there. Perhaps the had plans to have TIM play a different role but scrapped it.
No, Bioware said that there WILL be a "reapers win ending"
#36649
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 02:51
Golferguy758
-
- Members
- 1 136 messages
The only quote I remember about the reapers winning was one that said it would be entirely possible for the reapers to win. Never heard about them changing that.EpyonX3 wrote...
SirLugash wrote...
This probably has nothing to do with IT but I wanted to share this with you guys.
I did another ME2 run and just completed the Arrival DLC.
Because of this I watched the video of the bad ME2: Arrival ending (when you let the timer run out):
www.youtube.com/watch
I just noticed that when Harbinger is floating in the Citadel, he shoots more yellow colored beams (might be because of the applied filters in that sequence) which seems for me to come from his "eyes" and not red ones from under his body.
Anyways, I wonder why BioWare didn't make something similar to this as the ultimate bad ending (which kills you, your people and let the reapers continue the cycle).
Also, there is one scene in which you and all your squadmates including TIM are seen with Harbinger on Illium.
Could this be a hint to an upcoming DLC ?
I can't really believe they put all these things into a cutscene (that most people would probably never see) for nothing.
This is slow-dowm version of the scene if you want to take a closer look:
www.youtube.com/watch
Woah I've never seen that! I think they probably wanted Harbinger to shoot yello beams at first but probably changed it to red for ME3. I'd rather see the red to be honest.
Didn't bioware say there were no "reapers win" ending planned though?
I can understand them adding TIM. It wasn't known that he was with the reapers or at least had ties with them. It is weird that they put it there. Perhaps the had plans to have TIM play a different role but scrapped it.
While "technically" everyone can die with your low EMS ending, the reapers wouldn't win either since they are destroyed alongside everything else.
#36650
Posté 15 avril 2012 - 02:54
Rifneno
-
- Members
- 12 076 messages
Golferguy758 wrote...
The only quote I remember about the reapers winning was one that said it would be entirely possible for the reapers to win. Never heard about them changing that.
While "technically" everyone can die with your low EMS ending, the reapers wouldn't win either since they are destroyed alongside everything else.
Yep. That, along with almost everything else they told us about the ending, was undeniably false. As opposed to now, where all the stuff they've said against IT was vaguely worded and interpretable as something else.
