Ce sujet est fermé
BatmanTurian wrote...
SubAstris wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
My comparison with the cat is not invalid because objectively both interpretations are equally valid depending on your perception of the events and evidence. Do not equate this to creation or evolution. It is more like Common Quantum physics versus String Theory. There's not enough evidence to prove one right over the other yet.SubAstris wrote...
I think the comparison with Schrodinger's cat is invalid because it assumes both interpretations are equally valid, which is only your opinion (you profess to be neutral, do you not?). I agree both can't be proven totally correct or incorrect, but that doesn't imply one is as good an interpretation as the other (like Creation v Evolution).
I think the problem is you think IT and not IT are equally valid and not proven wrong. I think that IT is less likely to be true, although it has not been confirmed or proven untrue. Common ground?
You can believe that IT is less likely to be true, but you cannot present it as fact because you have no definitive evidence. It is your opinion supported by your perception of events and evidence, most of which has an equally plausible different interpretation. You have a habit of presenting your opinion as fact. That's where we are.
But those perceptions may or may not be supported by evidence, if they are, they go in its favour, if not, they don't
You seem to suggest that if I suggest an alternative explanation, as long as it is my perception of the facts, it is as equally valid as anything else. So say I think that the whole of ME3 happened in a parallel universe, using your logic this is as valid as IT or any other view, right? Does that really make sense to you?
"It is more like Common Quantum physics versus String Theory"- . It is not about proving one over the other in an absolute sense, but showing which is more likely. You are taking the view that IT has good evidence for it, and alternative explanations too, and so knowing the evidence, how can you actually be completely objective and completely neutral about it?
"you cannot present it as fact because you have no definitive evidence"- You've got it!!
Let's just let it go and see what Summer brings. No hard feelings.
Just do what I did with GBGriffin. Agree that whoever is right will buy the other a virtual drink and rub that fact that he was right in the other's face.
Retour en haut
