[quote]balance5050 wrote...
[quote]IronSabbath88 wrote...
Alright, this has to be said.
BioWare is doing everything possible to make the ending seem literal while NEVER outright denying the IT. They mentioned it once and they haven't mentioned it again. Here they are giving us all these little hints that literal ending is the way to go.
Well, that kinda spoils the EC doesn't it?
I think it's clear what's happening here. They're trying to get people to avoid IT at all costs, and it's working in a lot of cases.[/quote]
Yep, they wanted a good twist and we pretty much ruined it.
I just wish there was a way we could be "in on it", you know?
[/quote]
They won't change now, even if IDT is right. Too much effort, too many resources, and they arent that petty.
Morever, we don't know, IDT is a THEORY, meaning that it's still a twist, and still not ruined. When the EC comes out and confirms IDT, then we'll get the same rush of accomplishment at having guessed it as we would if it were a surprise.
[quote]Rifneno wrote...
[quote]Arian Dynas wrote...
Being a doubting Thomas about IT, but not for any real reason, just that sense of looming dread. Might be the headache/depression talking. Taking happy pills.[/quote]
You mean literally? Ack. I know what you mean... I forget one damn dose of my SNRIs and the next day I'm almost a tenth as bad as the average Twilight fan. Hope they kick back in for you soon.
[/quote]
Well, not actual happy pills, I am depressed, but at the moment my excuse is that it's Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD, how apropos) so I pop alot of vitamin D. Also, the major thing making me doubt IDT right now is Gamble's twitter. I can rationalize it away, but could someone ask him if his statement was merely taking the stuff from the game, and not inside knowledge?
[quote]Rifneno wrote...
[quote]Earthborn_Shepard wrote...
Yeah Bioware, nice to tell us that the Control ending is the bad one. I guess you could have shown that in the game.. but I guess I'm not intellectual enough to understand your artistic integrity.[/quote]
Sure you are. You're here with us, pro-IT. You understood it.

[/quote]
Indeed
[quote]MadRabbit999 wrote...
[quote]Earthborn_Shepard wrote...
Ok guys, school starts in 10 minutes so it's goodbye for now[/quote]
School? Out of curiosity.. how many people who beleive in the IT are above 15?
It's a serious question, no trolling.
[/quote]
I'm 19, going on 20, Anthropology student.
[quote]DJBare wrote...
[quote]MadRabbit999 wrote...
[quote]Earthborn_Shepard wrote...
Ok guys, school starts in 10 minutes so it's goodbye for now[/quote]
School? Out of curiosity.. how many people who beleive in the IT are above 15?
It's a serious question, no trolling.
[/quote]
*Raises hand* 52, but I guess you can call it senile delusion.
[/quote]
Ah, I apologize for one of my earlier assumptions. You do have the right to use the Sean Connery avatar.
[quote]Earthborn_Shepard wrote...
and since it's getting so cozy in here right now, how about country and real first name?
For me: Germany (yeah most of you already know that)
Ines

[/quote]
America, Gavyn.
Yes I have a ****ing weird name. don't give me a hard time.
[quote]MadRabbit999 wrote...
[quote]Rifneno wrote...
[quote]MadRabbit999 wrote...
School? Out of curiosity.. how many people who beleive in the IT are above 15?
It's a serious question, no trolling.
[/quote]
Bull****. If you didn't mean it as "let's prove the other side is ****** kids" you wouldn't have asked for IT belief status along with age.
[/quote]
I was actually hoping you would pop up... you have been incredibly aggressive with anything and anyone either disputing IT, or trying to create a debate, and have now proved my point. Glad to see you still live up your childish standards, but I am warning you, keep this aggressive behaviour and you could be reported for bullying and harassment, the boards are for discussions, not your personal playground.
But thanks for clearing that up (to the rest that answered about their age range).
[/quote]
Stop baiting him.
You haven't been any better with your clear consescension, mudslinging (childish? surely you can do better than THAT.) and general attitude.
I won't deny you've attempted politeness, and at least try to keep your arguments coherent, but despite claiming to take the moral high road, you have been just as agressive as Rifneno.
No, this forum is NOT his personal playground, neither is it yours, for you to say what you want.
spotless had the right of it quite well, this is (since your crowd seems so insistent in compating us to religious fanatics) the IDT church, and quite simply, you do not waltz into a church, calling the parishonoers idiots for their beleifs and try to convert them, if you want to be heard, you attend Sunday school and become that obnoxious kid in the back row the teacher hates because you ask the hard questions.
...
I think I lost control of that metaphor.
You can disagree, in fact we encourage it. But respect us and we shall respect you.