LOL at work. They all looked at me.... THANKS!!!!
Was the ending a hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory
#44551
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:26
#44552
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:26
Still if someone don't agree with your theory 100% but like 75% you go all "you didn't play the game / you didn't thought about it" Doesn't make it any better for a civilized converation/debate. This thread degenerated from something very interesting/good here in the forums to we troll each other", complain about the non IT belivers, or congratulate ourselves.byne wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
balance5050 wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
im the troll king and you should all obey me, of course. some still seem to struggle, but they are soon fully indoctrinated as well by grasping to the indoctrination theory and not seeing the moon walking bear in the background.
Actually GBGriffin has the title of troll king, you're not even a very good troll.
thats because im not trying to be. im still waiting for bioware to tell us whats the truth. then im gonna troll you.
Whats up with you people?
I dont hang out in anti-IT threads and inform them over and over again how I'm gonna totally troll them and rub it in if IT happens to be true, yet we have seen tons of anti-IT people come in here claiming they're totally gonna troll us and rub it in if it happens to be false.
The anti-ITers seem to take all of this way too personally.
#44553
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:27
waldstr18 wrote...
byne wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
balance5050 wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
im the troll king and you should all obey me, of course. some still seem to struggle, but they are soon fully indoctrinated as well by grasping to the indoctrination theory and not seeing the moon walking bear in the background.
Actually GBGriffin has the title of troll king, you're not even a very good troll.
thats because im not trying to be. im still waiting for bioware to tell us whats the truth. then im gonna troll you.
Whats up with you people?
I dont hang out in anti-IT threads and inform them over and over again how I'm gonna totally troll them and rub it in if IT happens to be true, yet we have seen tons of anti-IT people come in here claiming they're totally gonna troll us and rub it in if it happens to be false.
The anti-ITers seem to take all of this way too personally.
really? im not allone in this? awesome. i like competition. the other trolls have nothing on me, im gonna be mr. t in the end!
also, i just want to troll you, cause you called me a troll first, without me trolling at all. so now i am forced to show you how good a troll i can be.
Okay. Here's what you do. Go to Canada or some other artic setting and train really hard by lifting things, chopping wood and running in the snow. Make sure you put up a picture of your enemy to inspire you too.
Now go and Cue Rocky Theme music.
#44554
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:28
I never thought of that way. The implications are disturbing.Hawk227 wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Also, the major thing making me doubt IDT right now is Gamble's twitter. I can rationalize it away, but could someone ask him if his statement was merely taking the stuff from the game, and not inside knowledge?
I was just reading those tweets...Mike Gamble wrote...
but the idea is there is no concept of machine or organic anymore. There is only life.
Does he not realize that synthesis has Eugenics undertones. Homogenizing the galaxy, removing undesirable traits and making everyone the same in the name of peace. It made me a little nauseous.
#44555
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:28
byne wrote...
"Lets forcibly turn everyone hispanic! White people will clearly always try to enslave black people, and those silly black people will try to insist they have rights and revolt, so we should remove the possibility of that by making everyone the same! Diversity is awful!"
See, Synthesis becomes clearly racist if you use anything other than organics and synthetics as the example.
I would be ok with this. Hispanic women are hot.....
#44556
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:28
Hawk227 wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Also, the major thing making me doubt IDT right now is Gamble's twitter. I can rationalize it away, but could someone ask him if his statement was merely taking the stuff from the game, and not inside knowledge?
I was just reading those tweets...Mike Gamble wrote...
but the idea is there is no concept of machine or organic anymore. There is only life.
Does he not realize that synthesis has Eugenics undertones. Homogenizing the galaxy, removing undesirable traits and making everyone the same in the name of peace. It made me a little nauseous.
The same Mike Gamble claiming at PAX that they didn't want to be prescriptive? Pfft...
#44557
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:28
byne wrote...
Hawk227 wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Also,
the major thing making me doubt IDT right now is Gamble's twitter. I can
rationalize it away, but could someone ask him if his statement was
merely taking the stuff from the game, and not inside knowledge?
I was just reading those tweets...Mike Gamble wrote...
but the idea is there is no concept of machine or organic anymore. There is only life.
Does he not realize that synthesis has Eugenics undertones.
Homogenizing the galaxy, removing undesirable traits and making everyone
the same in the name of peace. It made me a little nauseous. [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/sick.png[/smilie]
"Lets forcibly turn everyone hispanic! White people will clearly always try to enslave black people, and those silly black people will try to insist they have rights and revolt, so we should remove the possibility of that by making everyone the same! Diversity is awful!"
See, Synthesis becomes clearly racist if you use anything other than organics and synthetics as the example.
I dont understand how anyone can look at forcibly altering everyone in the entire galaxy right down to the very structure of their DNA, and see that as the happy ending.
I think this whole issue stems from people not accepting the starchilds assertion that synthetic and organic will always make war. Now, ASSUMING the literal ending, then basically this is the truth as the writers saw/created it. Hence, synthesis allows for two peoples to coexist peacefully.
*shrug*
#44558
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:29
waldstr18 wrote...
byne wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
balance5050 wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
im the troll king and you should all obey me, of course. some still seem to struggle, but they are soon fully indoctrinated as well by grasping to the indoctrination theory and not seeing the moon walking bear in the background.
Actually GBGriffin has the title of troll king, you're not even a very good troll.
thats because im not trying to be. im still waiting for bioware to tell us whats the truth. then im gonna troll you.
Whats up with you people?
I dont hang out in anti-IT threads and inform them over and over again how I'm gonna totally troll them and rub it in if IT happens to be true, yet we have seen tons of anti-IT people come in here claiming they're totally gonna troll us and rub it in if it happens to be false.
The anti-ITers seem to take all of this way too personally.
really? im not allone in this? awesome. i like competition. the other trolls have nothing on me, im gonna be mr. t in the end!
also, i just want to troll you, cause you called me a troll first, without me trolling at all. so now i am forced to show you how good a troll i can be.
I dont believe I ever personally called you a troll.
You're annoying sure, and I've pointed that out, but I havent called you a troll as far as I know.
Also, Mr. T would never troll. He pities the fools that troll.
#44559
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:29
thank you.
#44560
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:30
waldstr18 wrote...
byne wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
balance5050 wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
im the troll king and you should all obey me, of course. some still seem to struggle, but they are soon fully indoctrinated as well by grasping to the indoctrination theory and not seeing the moon walking bear in the background.
Actually GBGriffin has the title of troll king, you're not even a very good troll.
thats because im not trying to be. im still waiting for bioware to tell us whats the truth. then im gonna troll you.
Whats up with you people?
I dont hang out in anti-IT threads and inform them over and over again how I'm gonna totally troll them and rub it in if IT happens to be true, yet we have seen tons of anti-IT people come in here claiming they're totally gonna troll us and rub it in if it happens to be false.
The anti-ITers seem to take all of this way too personally.
really? im not allone in this? awesome. i like competition. the other trolls have nothing on me, im gonna be mr. t in the end!
also, i just want to troll you, cause you called me a troll first, without me trolling at all. so now i am forced to show you how good a troll i can be.
Don't flatter yourself.
#44561
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:31
SS2Dante wrote...
I think this whole issue stems from people not accepting the starchilds assertion that synthetic and organic will always make war. Now, ASSUMING the literal ending, then basically this is the truth as the writers saw/created it. Hence, synthesis allows for two peoples to coexist peacefully.
*shrug*
Except the writers straight up showed that coexisting peacefully was possible by allowing you to resolve the Geth/Quarian situation peacefully.
If they really wanted to drive the point that coexisting isnt possible, they wouldnt have included that option.
#44562
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:32
waldstr18 wrote...
byne wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
balance5050 wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
im the troll king and you should all obey me, of course. some still seem to struggle, but they are soon fully indoctrinated as well by grasping to the indoctrination theory and not seeing the moon walking bear in the background.
Actually GBGriffin has the title of troll king, you're not even a very good troll.
thats because im not trying to be. im still waiting for bioware to tell us whats the truth. then im gonna troll you.
Whats up with you people?
I dont hang out in anti-IT threads and inform them over and over again how I'm gonna totally troll them and rub it in if IT happens to be true, yet we have seen tons of anti-IT people come in here claiming they're totally gonna troll us and rub it in if it happens to be false.
The anti-ITers seem to take all of this way too personally.
really? im not allone in this? awesome. i like competition. the other trolls have nothing on me, im gonna be mr. t in the end!
also, i just want to troll you, cause you called me a troll first, without me trolling at all. so now i am forced to show you how good a troll i can be.
#44563
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:32
#44564
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:33
waldstr18 wrote...
@megumiazusa
thank you.
Wald, you've had your moments. I don't think you're really a troll. I think you've mad the mistake of not bringing up relevant points in the past and just said that you don't agree with IDT.
Lately, it seems to me that you've stepped up your game and brought up good points or fair arguments.
Keep up the good work.
#44565
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:36
Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 26 avril 2012 - 08:36 .
#44566
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:36
Sorry for coming up with this subject again, but it's really hard to catch up here...EpyonX3 wrote...
Simon_Says wrote...
Synthesis is actually a pretty good deal, if you don't think about the ethics of it too much. Especially if you got transhumanist leanings.
Yeah this is why I think Synthesis is a blend of Renegade and Paragon.
Renegade because you change everyone's DNA against their will and paragon because there's peace without killing anyone else after that point.
Since the reapers are still around, the relays can be rebuilt.
In the face-value ending the green option (synthesis) is the neutral option. But even then, the red one is, IMO, the best one, cause Shep decide, stays (and eventually dies) as a human. In the blue one he becomes a Reaper (maybe thought as necessary evil), in the green one a Husk at best or green atoms.
Necessary evolution ? Maybe, but I doubt it... Every specie has its own way to evolve, there is absolutely no need to merge it with another one. I might be wrong, but I can't recall any example of it in the whole pre- and natural history. If anyone has a counterargument, please...
There are plenty stories where the ending puts your beliefs in question : all for what you were fighting, suffering for, is maybe not right... Perhaps you were wrong from the very start... For example: peace between Quarian and Geth won't last or it's only the exception that proves the rule.
But here it's not the case, the Godchild logic is twisted and self-based. He finds every one guilty before the crime even happens (Minority Report might be here a good analogy). Thus all the proposed choices are lies, since the starting-point of his reasoning is wrong. I was never found of pre-emptive wars and will never be.
So even it the face-value ending is the real deal, I'll continue to choose destroy and say the godchild "f*** you"...
That's all I wanted to say. Sorry if I did somewhat disturb the current discussion,,,
@Arian Dynas
Thanks for the infos about the Dark Energy!
#44567
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:37
Modifié par balance5050, 26 avril 2012 - 08:38 .
#44568
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:38
byne wrote...
Hawk227 wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Also,
the major thing making me doubt IDT right now is Gamble's twitter. I can rationalize it away, but could someone ask him if his statement was merely taking the stuff from the game, and not inside knowledge?
I was just reading those tweets...Mike Gamble wrote...
but the idea is there is no concept of machine or organic anymore. There is only life.
Does he not realize that synthesis has Eugenics undertones.
Homogenizing the galaxy, removing undesirable traits and making everyone the same in the name of peace. It made me a little nauseous. ../../../images/forum/emoticons/sick.png
"Lets forcibly turn everyone hispanic! White people will clearly always try to enslave black people, and those silly black people will try to insist they have rights and revolt, so we should remove the possibility of that by making everyone the same! Diversity is awful!"
See, Synthesis becomes clearly racist if you use anything other than organics and synthetics as the example.
I dont understand how anyone can look at forcibly altering everyone in the entire galaxy right down to the very structure of their DNA, and see that as the happy ending.
Great points here. It would create - in my opinion - a very distopian future. There has been a lot of literature on the subject of "sameness" and forcing change upon a large population in order to control said population.
People will rebel. No matter how "perfect" a system there is in place, there will always be those that rebel against that system.
#44569
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:38
byne wrote...
SS2Dante wrote...
I think this whole issue stems from people not accepting the starchilds assertion that synthetic and organic will always make war. Now, ASSUMING the literal ending, then basically this is the truth as the writers saw/created it. Hence, synthesis allows for two peoples to coexist peacefully.
*shrug*
Except the writers straight up showed that coexisting peacefully was possible by allowing you to resolve the Geth/Quarian situation peacefully.
If they really wanted to drive the point that coexisting isnt possible, they wouldnt have included that option.
Yeah but that's a very short-sighted view of things. I mean, it took SHEPARD to do it, and the circumstances were actually helpful. Since it seems likely from everything we've heard about this that the usual course of events is war, the next cycle will just repeat the mistakes (whether or not this is a Reaper cycle or simply enough time passing is irrelevant), since they probably won't have a Shepard. (ha, used it like Buzz
'Course, even in the literal view I think it's just a nice space magicky metaphor for "Hey, we're not so different, we can all get along".
#44570
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:38
Big G13 wrote...
I never thought of that way. The implications are disturbing.Hawk227 wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Also, the major thing making me doubt IDT right now is Gamble's twitter. I can rationalize it away, but could someone ask him if his statement was merely taking the stuff from the game, and not inside knowledge?
I was just reading those tweets...Mike Gamble wrote...
but the idea is there is no concept of machine or organic anymore. There is only life.
Does he not realize that synthesis has Eugenics undertones. Homogenizing the galaxy, removing undesirable traits and making everyone the same in the name of peace. It made me a little nauseous.
Even as the Catalyst was describing it the first time I knew, I hated it, but I didn't make the connection to why I hated it so much until his tweets.
#44571
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:39
waldstr18 wrote...
byne wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
balance5050 wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
im the troll king and you should all obey me, of course. some still seem to struggle, but they are soon fully indoctrinated as well by grasping to the indoctrination theory and not seeing the moon walking bear in the background.
Actually GBGriffin has the title of troll king, you're not even a very good troll.
thats because im not trying to be. im still waiting for bioware to tell us whats the truth. then im gonna troll you.
Whats up with you people?
I dont hang out in anti-IT threads and inform them over and over again how I'm gonna totally troll them and rub it in if IT happens to be true, yet we have seen tons of anti-IT people come in here claiming they're totally gonna troll us and rub it in if it happens to be false.
The anti-ITers seem to take all of this way too personally.
really? im not allone in this? awesome. i like competition. the other trolls have nothing on me, im gonna be mr. t in the end!
also, i just want to troll you, cause you called me a troll first, without me trolling at all. so now i am forced to show you how good a troll i can be.
I think tutoring all those depressed kids is meesing with you....might need to pick up a happier job.... like a divorse consultant or something.
#44572
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:39
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Still if someone don't agree with your theory 100% but like 75% you go all "you didn't play the game / you didn't thought about it" Doesn't make it any better for a civilized converation/debate. This thread degenerated from something very interesting/good here in the forums to we troll each other", complain about the non IT belivers, or congratulate ourselves.byne wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
balance5050 wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
im the troll king and you should all obey me, of course. some still seem to struggle, but they are soon fully indoctrinated as well by grasping to the indoctrination theory and not seeing the moon walking bear in the background.
Actually GBGriffin has the title of troll king, you're not even a very good troll.
thats because im not trying to be. im still waiting for bioware to tell us whats the truth. then im gonna troll you.
Whats up with you people?
I dont hang out in anti-IT threads and inform them over and over again how I'm gonna totally troll them and rub it in if IT happens to be true, yet we have seen tons of anti-IT people come in here claiming they're totally gonna troll us and rub it in if it happens to be false.
The anti-ITers seem to take all of this way too personally.
Not that simple. It's the ones who come in and say "IDT is wrong because X, bet you never thought of that!" When X has actually been discussed repeatedly and can often be answered by the threads first page synopsis, clearly showing the poster has spent little to no time really trying to understand IDT. This thread tries to stay focused on IDT, but it's a daily barrage of trolls and noobs who clearly dislike IDT.
Don't like it? Fine! Give concrete reasons why or leave us alone.
#44573
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:39
actually all the points ive made lately i made in the past at least 2 or 3 times.
oh, and another thing i posted 3 weeks back: i didnt know about the trolls, but now that i do, i really like them. they seem to have a lot of fun. i like having fun. so im gonna start my troll carreer by trolling you once the idt is disproven for real.
also: i appologize to the ones who never been rude to me, but still believe in the idt. when im going to troll you, its all meant in good fun anyways, so dont be offended. of course the fanatics will be pissed no matter what, but i dont mind that at all. hihihi, hahaha.
#44574
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:40
I see everything!
#44575
Posté 26 avril 2012 - 08:40
Besides which there are plenty of people reading this thread who are going to be disappointed enough if the issues with the ending aren't resolved - I fail to see how your delight in that scenario will do anything but make it worse, and there's a variety of names used to describe people who do that.
Not that you're one at the moment (judgement pending) but my personal favourite has four letters and begins with c. Just saying.
Anyway, back to covering what I've missed...
My name is Alice, I'm 24 and a trainee doctor studying in London, so hi all! Another tick in the 'over 15' box.
As for the endings, I believe in IT and to be honest it's remaining my headcanon for the rest of forever if another satisfactory explanation isn't given. Granted, my fiancé laughs at me for even having a headcanon




Ce sujet est fermé

Retour en haut





